Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Footage that kills the conspiracy theories: Unseen 9/11 footage shows WTC Building 7
UK Daily Mail ^ | November 1, 2011 | Meghan Keneally

Posted on 11/01/2011 12:37:58 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement

Its dramatic collapse several hours after the Twin Towers fell triggered a decade of conspiracy theories. Those who believed that the September 11 attacks on America were not carried out by Al Qaeda terrorists pointed to the fall of World Trade Center Building 7 as proof of their wild claims. But a newly released video appears to finally prove once and for all that Building 7 was brought down by the intense heat of the blazing World Trade Center - and not explosives, as conspiracy theorists claim.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 911; 911conspiracy; alqaeda; conspiracies; conspiracytheory; footage; muslims; nyc; ronpaul; truthers; wtc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: mnehring
Yea but remember all those planes have those tanks to produce chemtrails to keep the sheeple stupid and who knows how hot those chemicals burn.

Are you an xkcd reader? From about two weeks ago:

Jet Fuel

21 posted on 11/01/2011 1:03:33 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Herman Cain: possibly the escapee most dangerous to the Democrats since Frederick Douglass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Actually what people don’t really get is that the steel never had to melt. It only had to reach the softening point which is a lot lower temperature than the melting point. The truth is that jet fuel will not get you to the melting point without some work. However it won’t have any trouble getting to the softening point. Once you hit that the structural members are more like silly putty than I beams.

I once had this discussion with a wingnut who believed it was an inside job. The fact that I have a PhD in steelmaking didn’t seem to phase him at all.


22 posted on 11/01/2011 1:03:53 PM PDT by drbuzzard (different league)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Silly man. It was the Jooooos! /s


23 posted on 11/01/2011 1:05:24 PM PDT by pingman (Durn tootin'; I like Glock shootin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Fire doesn’t melt steel, right?”

No. And if that makes you wonder what people do at steel mills all day, well, they melt it with the power of love.


24 posted on 11/01/2011 1:06:24 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Ping a ling


25 posted on 11/01/2011 1:07:52 PM PDT by erod (Unlike the President I am a true Chicagoan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drbuzzard

The fact that you have a PhD in steelmaking proves the point!! What’s the frequency, Kenneth??

/wingnut


26 posted on 11/01/2011 1:11:41 PM PDT by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nepeta

My favorite “proof” that “fire doesn’t melt steel” uttered by a former neighbor, an English teacher.

“Look, I’ve been cooking on this stainless still grill forever and it has melted yet and neither has the lid. I’ve got a Master’s degree you know.” She said with a sneer.


27 posted on 11/01/2011 1:12:00 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; The_Victor
He was sarcastically paraphrasing a claim by the eminent physicist Rosie O’Donnell.
28 posted on 11/01/2011 1:12:53 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Rosie the Riviter worked with steel all the time. She should know.


29 posted on 11/01/2011 1:18:50 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (The patient is too far gone to save.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56

“I loved the History Channel program that reviewed and debunked the conspiracy theories.”

Apparently, they’ve matured since airing “The Men Who Killed Kennedy.”


30 posted on 11/01/2011 1:20:01 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
He was sarcastically paraphrasing a claim by the eminent physicist Rosie O’Donnell.

I knew that. I was adding to the sarcasm by pointing out that fire is the primary means by which we have always melted steel. Weather by accident or intention. The engineering curriculum being my evidence.

I guess I failed.

31 posted on 11/01/2011 1:20:37 PM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: drbuzzard

iBeams - something else Apple will trademark. lol

According to them Bush was the most incompetent President ever. And yet he supposedly planned and orchestrated the most complicated and largest controlled demolition in history.


32 posted on 11/01/2011 1:22:54 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

...just like the Mars landing too, which is why we had to frame OJ.


33 posted on 11/01/2011 1:24:35 PM PDT by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

“Look, I’ve been cooking on this stainless still grill forever and it has melted yet and neither has the lid”

Was her grill propping up a skyscraper?


34 posted on 11/01/2011 1:24:35 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Also why the approximate hour wait after the planes impact the towers before blowing up the buildings? Did the evil conspirators have some compassion to allow a number to escape with their lives first before saying ok they’ve had enough time bring the towers down? Wouldn’t evil conspirators want as high a body count as possible to stoke outrage?


35 posted on 11/01/2011 1:24:58 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

They vacated Building 7.

They vacated it for a reason, It might go down , It did. End of story.


36 posted on 11/01/2011 1:25:36 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nepeta

If this doesn't convince you, nothing will.

37 posted on 11/01/2011 1:28:17 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ceterum autem censeo, Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

My mechanical engineering curriculum didn’t cover the non-fire technology for melting steel.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The EE’s cover it.


38 posted on 11/01/2011 1:33:17 PM PDT by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drbuzzard

IIRC, the WTC towers employed an innovative construction technique. I do not recall the details, but it relied on steel cables in tension, something like a suspension bridge. Once the heat caused the cables to go into yeild (get soft), the whole thing collapsed like a house of cards. It had a considerable amount of redundancy, but more support was lost on the side of building towards the entrance wound, unbalancing the contraption and reducing the margin.


39 posted on 11/01/2011 1:39:02 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ceterum autem censeo, Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Fire doesn’t melt steel, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

lol

I always wanted to asked Rosie if she thought steel gets dug out of the ground in that shape or if they grow them that way.

40 posted on 11/01/2011 1:42:57 PM PDT by Mrs.Z
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson