Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security Now Officially in the Red
Washington Post ^ | October 29, 2011 | Lisa Montgomery

Posted on 10/30/2011 4:58:03 AM PDT by Stajack

Now, Social Security is sucking money out of the Treasury. This year, it will add a projected $46 billion to the nation’s budget problems, according to projections by system trustees. Replacing cash lost to a one-year payroll tax holiday will require an additional $105 billion. If the payroll tax break is expanded next year, as President Obama has proposed, Social Security will need an extra $267 billion to pay promised benefits.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 401ks; avoidallbigpurchases; avoidalltaxes; barackruptcy; barter; debt; deficit; no41000dollarvolt4me; notbreakingnews; payrolltaxes; recyclevehicles; socialsecurity; ssi; starve0bama; starve0ws; swap; theuntaxed; undergroundeconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: DuncanWaring
We are watching America go down the shitter.

Moving funds to another country is starting to look like a smart idea. After 45 years of great society communism, The freeloaders now outnumber the workers pulling the wagon. Communism is openly accepted in political discourse in America. We now have a communist government.

For 45 years we have been paying lazy fat slobs to live in public housing projects with our SS money. Paying them to get drunk, use drugs, stuff their faces and get fat, and reproduce more welfare slugs. (See our president and his extended family as an example.) Any society that does this deserves to fail.

101 posted on 10/30/2011 8:43:50 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Shhh!

We aren't supposed to be told this until there's a Republican President and Congress!

102 posted on 10/30/2011 8:47:02 AM PDT by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

yes.

a tax on democrats.


103 posted on 10/30/2011 9:00:03 AM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Boy I’m glad I’m not a young person who has to pay that bill. LOL!

Speaking of which, why don’t you little people pay your taxes? Your government is broke. :)

/sarc(?)


104 posted on 10/30/2011 9:14:59 AM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stajack
Photobucket
105 posted on 10/30/2011 9:16:48 AM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

As the indians would say...

It is a good day to die...

Should that ever come to pass I would expect every true patriot to rise up and do what is necessary.

I can’t see them even suggest this though.


106 posted on 10/30/2011 9:25:39 AM PDT by light-bulb (Plures efficimur quotiens metimur a vobis; semen est sanguis Christianorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

Social Security was born in the red, the guv just decided not to do anything for 80 years.


107 posted on 10/30/2011 9:43:01 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01
The biggest problem is how do you tell someone who has paid into this system (against their will) that they don't get paid?

It wasn't entirely against their/our will. The ones who have the most invested also had the most time to stop Congress from spending all the money.

108 posted on 10/30/2011 9:45:02 AM PDT by Darth Reardon (No offense to drunken sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Barney Frank mentioned this over a year ago..


109 posted on 10/30/2011 9:49:28 AM PDT by Stayfree (Find out the truth at Lawyers-Lawsuits.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

No worries. What do you think all of those 401k accounts are for?


110 posted on 10/30/2011 10:19:25 AM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Sarah Palin's warning about "death panels" doesn't look so goofy now, does it? ;)
It never EVER did!


Agreed, not to any thinking conservative with an ounce of common sense, but to listen to the lamestream media critics and the treasonous POS's in 0bama's illegal regime, you would think Sarah Palin had an IV drip with LSD-25 going on 24/7.

And RomneyCare = 0bamaCare = MortuaryCare (if you're lucky).
111 posted on 10/30/2011 10:30:32 AM PDT by mkjessup (Is Herman Cain the best conservative candidate? If you say "no", then tell me who IS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

I know how it works, but why the media BLACKOUT?


112 posted on 10/30/2011 10:30:57 AM PDT by cumbo78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01
The biggest problem is how do you tell someone who has paid into this system (against their will) that they don't get paid?

The same way you tell any other creditor to a bankrupt party. "Sucks to be you (or me ... or most of the rest of us)".

Not unlike the secured GM creditors who had to get behind the UAW in the payment line.

113 posted on 10/30/2011 10:43:15 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Stajack
Harry Reid: 'The Arithmetic on Social Security Works' -- 'It's Not in Crisis'

Harry Reid: Social Security Has No Problems. Umm, No Harry

Democrats kick the can
114 posted on 10/30/2011 10:43:54 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
Boy I’m glad I’m not a young person who has to pay that bill.

Sarcasm noted, but sadly, by procrastinating until the Social Security situation becomes an actual crisis, the politicians narrow the available options down to raising taxes on current and future workers, aka "the young".

115 posted on 10/30/2011 10:54:33 AM PDT by Stajack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Social Security was born in the red, the guv just decided not to do anything for 80 years.

I agree, it was born in the red, but finally even the SS Trustees have to admit it. So it's now official.

116 posted on 10/30/2011 11:02:16 AM PDT by Stajack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: cumbo78

why the media BLACKOUT?

It’s too prosaic plus it’s from the doomed candidate McCotter. There’s nothing magical in his “plan”. It’s very similar to the Ryan plan. Nothing is done to reduce today’s SS deficit. Under his plan SS deficit is paid out of general funds. The money to do that is borrowed from our creditors. Other programs are cut to reduce that borrowing. Sometime in the out years, long after McCotter is retired and possibly dead, people will begin to draw from their own “personal accounts” (as personal as anything can be when controlled by the government).

Yes, I’m dismissive of his plan. It’s nothing new and fails to solve today’s problem today. Today, we are running a huge overall deficit and a smaller SS deficit. That has to be changed and soon or the Federal Reserve Notes (or as most call them “dollars”) used as payment for SS checks won’t be worth the paper they are printed on.


117 posted on 10/30/2011 11:05:51 AM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

****Social Security will need an extra $267 billion to pay promised benefits.****

But, but we were promised! Look at what was said by the SS back in 1964!

http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssa/usa1964-2.html

Self-Supporting

“The program is designed so that contributions plus interest on the investments of the social security trust funds will be sufficient to meet all of the costs of benefits and administration, now and into the indefinite future—without any subsidy from the general funds of the Government. Both the Congress and the Executive Branch, regardless of political party in power, have scrupulously provided in advance for full financing of all liberalizations in the program.”


118 posted on 10/30/2011 11:20:06 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Great links, Cheerio. The kind of stuff that normally gets replayed to elected Republicans by the national media, if the situation was reversed. But my bet is that Harry Reid gets a pass.


119 posted on 10/30/2011 11:31:51 AM PDT by Stajack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Stajack

just open up the lockbox /S


120 posted on 10/30/2011 11:34:03 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (So much stress was put on Bush's Fault that it finally let go, magnitude 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson