Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US's Most Powerful Nuclear Bomb Being Dismantled
ABC NEWS ^ | October 25, 2011 | BETSY BLANEY

Posted on 10/25/2011 7:48:27 AM PDT by penelopesire

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
Hmmmm....just as Obama is setting the Middle East on fire..he is weakening America's defenses. What could go wrong?
1 posted on 10/25/2011 7:48:29 AM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

We started disassembling these in the 1980s. So it’s Reagan’s fault.

Seriously? This is in breaking? Giant iron-bomb nukes are pretty useless. I doubt a BUFF would make it close enough to a real target to drop it.


2 posted on 10/25/2011 7:52:06 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Why do I suddenly feel sick?


3 posted on 10/25/2011 7:52:41 AM PDT by goodnesswins (My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

4 posted on 10/25/2011 7:52:41 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

In the meantime we have Chinese scientist throughout our nuclear programs and China, no doubt, continues to develop EMP bombs, neutron bombs and killer satellites, using technology stolen from the US.


5 posted on 10/25/2011 7:54:55 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

‘Cause, y’know, if we do it, everybody else will...

Freakin’ Pollyanna.


6 posted on 10/25/2011 7:57:24 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

The original intent of this weapon was as a bunker buster. We now have much more effective deep penetrating and very accurate weapons to do the job. It’s obsolete. Like the Sherman tank, a good piece of engineering in its day,


7 posted on 10/25/2011 7:57:24 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Why do I suddenly feel sick?

Because you don't read articles, and just glance at headlines?

8 posted on 10/25/2011 7:57:24 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Like I said in the OTHER thread on this same subject...we got a ton more nukes sitting atop missiles in silos. They can go anywhere in the world with a few minutes notice. No reason to feel sick, worried, distraught, upset, on even slightly shaken. The B-53 did it’s job, and it’s being retired. There is NO MORE to read into it than that.


9 posted on 10/25/2011 7:57:36 AM PDT by hoagy62 (The United States of America. Great idea...while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Good perspective. Thanks.


10 posted on 10/25/2011 7:59:49 AM PDT by Obadiah (I am an official program sponsor of The Mitt Busters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Well if there is a work accident it would happen in amarillo where you couldnt tell the difference in the landscape.


11 posted on 10/25/2011 8:01:58 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

“The original intent of this weapon was as a bunker buster.”

But it could also be detonated at altitude to optimize effect on a city. 9 mile effective blast radius. Double that for lethal thermal effects. That’s one bad piece of work.


12 posted on 10/25/2011 8:04:49 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Too bad it wasn’t dismantled as originally intended: instantaneously in a 10 million degrees F, 4-mile wide fireball above Iran’s nuclear development facility, or even better, on Amahdi-jihad himself.


13 posted on 10/25/2011 8:05:54 AM PDT by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
obama promised to disarm America and he is doing so at an accelerated rate.

LLS

14 posted on 10/25/2011 8:06:07 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("Americans are hungry to feel once again a sense of mission and greatness." Ronaldo Magnus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Well if we need to nuke a Giant Asteroid we are SOL:


15 posted on 10/25/2011 8:07:51 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
"The completion of the dismantling program is a year ahead of schedule, according to the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, and aligns with President Barack Obama's goal of reducing the number of nuclear weapons."

MAYBE that's why....

16 posted on 10/25/2011 8:07:58 AM PDT by goodnesswins (My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Thanks.


17 posted on 10/25/2011 8:09:13 AM PDT by goodnesswins (My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

The B-53 is an early to mid-60’s era device, 9000 lbs, 12-1/2 feet long. It is a complete pig. The first ones to be dismantled were dismantled in 1968. That’s how old it is. If ever we became engaged in a nuclear exchange, this is the absolute last thing we would use on anything or anybody. It’s a museum piece, at best. Not that it wouldn’t ruin your day if it went off, but it’s better to dismantle it, from any conceivable standpoint, war OR peace.


18 posted on 10/25/2011 8:09:23 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Madoff screwed the rich. Bernanke screwed us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
It had deterrent value back in the day (50’s and 60’s) when the Soviets and the Western Alliance seemed to place great value on putting lots of megatons out in the field, ready to fly. I have heard that current strategic planning values accuracy and the destructive power of a lot of smaller warheads properly placed for maximum effect. Fielding big blockbusters that have little chance of reaching the target is a lot like loading up on battleships. Better to have subs to take them out, and do other things.
19 posted on 10/25/2011 8:09:58 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker
Oh, come on, we can do better, I can build somethign that can take out 7/8 of a solar system...


20 posted on 10/25/2011 8:10:22 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson