Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Some GOPers, It’s Still Anyone but Mitt Romney (Hurl Alert!!!)
Roll Call ^ | October 20, 2011 | Stuart Rothenberg

Posted on 10/21/2011 9:35:32 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
The author is clearly clueless when he assumes that the only reason we want Herman Cain nominated just to stick it to 0bama. We want him nominated because he is the only conservative and we like what he says. Romney is not a conservative, and contrary to what the author says, the nomination of Mitt guarantees the reelection of Obama
1 posted on 10/21/2011 9:35:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am not yet sold on Cain, or on Perry, or on Gingrich.

Romney is definitely in the discard pile however, and I will crawl over broken glass to vote against that mendacious liberal. If Romney is the GOP nominee, Obama wins with a plurality.


2 posted on 10/21/2011 9:42:49 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Photobucket
3 posted on 10/21/2011 9:44:32 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Its Myth Remulak!


4 posted on 10/21/2011 9:46:22 AM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I believe so too


5 posted on 10/21/2011 9:46:51 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The last time the Republican/Media controlled insiders gave us their ‘its his turn’ candidate look what we got, OBAMA and the Marxists. No way this time. No way! Its snake eyes or slow craps either way.


6 posted on 10/21/2011 9:47:11 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
but the former pizza company CEO has a long way to go to demonstrate that he has the skills necessary to run the country.

Unlike, (dare I say it) OBAMA?/sarc
7 posted on 10/21/2011 9:48:47 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Stuart Rothenburg? Good heavens.


8 posted on 10/21/2011 9:51:31 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Romney’s the nominee, we’d be better of with Ubama tied up for four years in investigations and impeachment proceedings.


9 posted on 10/21/2011 9:55:58 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

He was talking to Jenna Lee on Fox News Happening Now at the beginning of the show and was telling her basically the same thing.


10 posted on 10/21/2011 9:56:08 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We have to make it clear that we do not want that Romney as the nominee


11 posted on 10/21/2011 9:59:02 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Other than the ignorant "prove they're not racist" cheap shots, the article is pretty well on the ball.

I like Cain and may vote for him, but he should understand that running for president is like preparing for an earnings call - you need to have thought out what questions you are likely or possibly asked and prepare a thoughtful and concise response for each of them. He can overcome that but right now it's a hurdle.

12 posted on 10/21/2011 10:00:03 AM PDT by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

H-CAIN (not to be confused with McCain) is the real thing unlike such unreliable status quo failed establishment backed RINOS as Obamney. To really defeat the left agenda we must undo the fundamental errors that have been destroying America. This is why HCAIN should be our point an in the WH. Romney is slick polished product of today’s unreliable leftward drifting political system resulting from socialist radical control and decades of academic indoctrination. Reagan was a one man REVOLUTION and phenomena of temporary geopolitical consequence because the academic canon and obamney never opened up to the ideals and truths which guided him. I recall seeing video of obamney himself emphatically distancing himself from president Reagan, and embracing libboleths etc. Not to mention Romney doing much of the legwork and setting the foundations for Obama care together with an mit economist who himself said it was romneys plan except with more zeros following it.


13 posted on 10/21/2011 10:03:53 AM PDT by defendit (Defend America Via CounterRevolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

H-CAIN (not to be confused with McCain) is the real thing unlike such unreliable status quo failed establishment backed RINOS as Obamney. To really defeat the left agenda we must undo the fundamental errors that have been destroying America. This is why HCAIN should be our point an in the WH. Romney is slick polished product of today’s unreliable leftward drifting political system resulting from socialist radical control and decades of academic indoctrination. Reagan was a one man REVOLUTION and phenomena of temporary geopolitical consequence because the academic canon and obamney never opened up to the ideals and truths which guided him. I recall seeing video of obamney himself emphatically distancing himself from president Reagan, and embracing libboleths etc. Not to mention Romney doing much of the legwork and setting the foundations for Obama care together with an mit economist who himself said it was romneys plan except with more zeros following it.


14 posted on 10/21/2011 10:04:11 AM PDT by defendit (Defend America Via CounterRevolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“the nomination of Mitt guarantees the reelection of Obama”

Ab-So-Lutely!

The nomination cat-fights are bringing to light the True Horror of Obama.

He’s lowered the bar SO FAR, that ALMOST, anyone appears an improvement, and running true to form, the bosses in the GOP don’t want to rock the pork wagon any more than they absolutely have to.

They have No intention of downsizing the bureaucracy.


15 posted on 10/21/2011 10:20:05 AM PDT by To-Whose-Benefit? (It is Error alone which needs the support of Government. The Truth can stand by itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Click the Pic               Thank you, JoeProBono

Gary and Harriet Are Getting Married!

Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!


Abolish FReepathons
Go Monthly

16 posted on 10/21/2011 10:40:56 AM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Similarly, conservatives would embrace Romney against Obama next year.

Not this conservative.

17 posted on 10/21/2011 10:42:23 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country but Herman Cain loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

same here

he could exhume Ronald Reagan and sit RR in as the VP nominee and it won’t phase me one bit.

Romney is not getting my vote. Ever.


18 posted on 10/21/2011 10:59:52 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We have to make it clear that we do not want that Romney as the nominee

They.

Don't.

Care.

19 posted on 10/21/2011 11:00:19 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Romney / Obama?
I would vote for Obama...
I prefer gridlock.

Everybody knows that nobody passes the Democrat agenda more effectively than a RINO. Romney will be able to gather a coalition of “centrist” Republicans and the remaining Democrats in Congress to “get things done”. Unfortunately, those things will be RomneyCare, Cap and Trade, Amnesty, Card Check, Stimulus III, and every other stupid Obama idea ever to come down the pike.

If Obama is re-elected, he will be paralysed, because every Republican knows that voting with Obama is electoral suicide. So an ineffective Obama is our best alternative if the choice is an effective Romney who has all the same goals.


20 posted on 10/21/2011 11:17:07 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (Obama's new motto: Après moi le déluge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson