Posted on 10/20/2011 1:12:42 PM PDT by Danae
Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1's natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.
In June 2008 no one was discussing Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162 (1875) with regard to Obama. In fact, those who were discussing the then Senator’s citizenship status had focused instead on his birth in Hawaii in a attempt to prove the future president was not born in the United States despite publication of the Senator’s short form computer generated Birth Certificate. It would not be until October of 2008 that Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility would be questioned as to his status as a dual citizen at the time of his birth.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
I have added you!
Let me know if you ever want off it. It’s a pretty low volume list.
Have Herman Cain file suit! Bring the popcorn.
Remember, a few days before the election, Michelle Obama said something like “They can't stop us now” ... took it to mean that they had the votes, regardless of ualifications.Michelle Obama, in a phone interview as reported 15 October 2008 by African Press International:
My husband and I know that there is no law that will stop him from becoming the president, just because some American white racists are bringing up the issue of my husband’s adoption by His step father.Note that the API article is scrubbed, and the Obama campaign machine immediately issued denials, claiming the interview was a fraud. See for one example of many follow-up reports at the time: Vox Populi blog of 17 October 2008.
Who knows?
However the timing is interesting. Obama's white relative who raised him, that being one Madelyn Dunham, his maternal grandmother was at that very time dead or dying. I say "dead or dying" because with the Obamas you just never know! The public account per the Wikipedia entry for Madelyn is thus:
On October 20, 2008, the Obama campaign announced that he would suspend campaign events on October 23 and 24 to spend some time with Dunham. His communications director told reporters that she had fallen ill in the preceding weeks, and that while she was released from the hospital the week before, her health had deteriorated "to the point where her situation is very serious."So taking the initial API story to be true Michelle Obama--who is the Black Queen of Obama's life, the one who seems to keep his white side buried, including his connections with his white family--took it on her own sweet initiative late one night, perhaps the SAME night grandmother Dunham is said to have been "released" from the hospital to the direct care of Obama's half-sister Maya, to call up API and claim, in paraphrase, "no racist whitey will be able to stop us using the law now!"On November 2, 2008 (November 3, 2008 in the continental United States), the Obama campaign announced that Madelyn Dunham had "died peacefully after a battle with cancer" in Hawaii.
There's direct evidence--his own words--that Barack Obama viewed his own grandmother who raised him, Madelyn Dunham, as a white racist, and plenty of biographical evidence that Michelle bears an abiding and mighty grudge against whites, or at least racist whites.
It is exceptionally curious what happened when Obama did go to Hawaii to visit the woman who raised him, his own mother's mother, the next week. Why is that?
Was Colon not in the Canal Zone at the time?
STARWISE - I think the March on Washing should be posted on News as a stand alone item, what do you think? Many more people will see it that way.
Why was McCain running for President if he knew (did he know?) he was Constitutionally ineligible?
Good question.
Perhaps he thought that the non-binding Senate resolution was good enough, but no retroactive action can make a person a Natural Born Citizen. It is a description of birth more than anything else. A condition of birth if you will. If you need one, then you aren’t one.
Power corrupts. Perhaps McCain felt like Obama did, that he deserved to run regardless of an constitutional lack. Certainly it played right onto Obama’s hands, frankly McCain’s presence as his rival for the job was ideal. I think this is why his team told the press McCain is who they really wanted to face, and is why the press suddenly propelled McCain’s campain at a time when everyone thought it was past over for him in Florida.
What I really want to know is why didn’t Hillary go for the throat. The Secretary of State bone she negotiated for just doesn’t seem to be enough of a quid pro quo....
Kudos, Danae. Thanks for the brilliant article. Much appreciated.
A typical trick of obots to keep people from reading and becoming informed, is to warn them off by alluding to viruses or trojans. Which you likely know. Just sayin’ for the sake of others that this is a trick I’ve noted many times, elsewhere as well as here.
I use Firefox with AdBlock and FlashBlock - no problem at Examiner.com or a lot of other sites.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/tstanley
About 3/4 of the way down:
Groups and Associations:
.
.
.
Legal Marketing Technology Forum
Obama for America
I continue to be amazed at the number of “original” FReepers that I see whose names are not familiar to me.
You have a great home page, too.
Cheers!
I questoined his motive which of course he did not like.
When people lie one naturally wonders about their motive!
I can only assume that 0h0m0 and his people have enough dirt on Hitlery to created a Mutually Assured Destruction situation.
Well well WELL.
Well well WELL indeed. Are there any more questions about Justia’s “movtives”? Not for me.
O.o
Ya don’t say.... interesting is what that is.
He was also at Harvard Law School in 1991, the same year 0 was head of the Law Review. Could it be that their association goes a long way back?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.