Article, then # 9 , and # 20 .
Posted on 10/18/2011 5:34:33 AM PDT by tutstar
This is the first in a two-part series examining how researcher Ron Polland created a forged duplicate of the Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House. This article details the methodology Polland used to deconstruct the White House document for the purpose of reconstructing his forged version. The second article will examine Polland's belief that the White House document was forged and his deductions about the alleged forger.
Researcher Ron Polland, known for his forensic investigation of Barack Obama's short-form birth certificate, now has constructed from scratch a duplicate of the document released by the White House in April, seeking to validate his contention that it was created by a forger.
"I created Obama's short-form birth certificate in 2008," Polland told WND, "and now I made Obama's long-form birth certificate."
As WND previously reported, Polland has demonstrated that during the 2008 presidential election campaign, the White House website posted an image of a short-form Obama Certification of Live Birth that actually was a forgery created by Polland, not a scan of an original certificate obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health.
"My recreation of the short-form was so convincing, the White House posted it on the White House website, claiming it was the real deal," Polland told WND. "In August 2008, I successfully duplicated the short-form in what I believe is the only way it could have been made. Now I have re-created the long-form with a forgery of my own that I believe most people will find hard to distinguish from the forgery the White House released."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“Haven’t you people gotten the Memo from RNC HQ?”
Post of the day.
Thanks.
He has delusions of grandeur. Simple magnification reveals significant differences.
ML/NJ
Article, then # 9 , and # 20 .
If you put a beard and black rim glasses on Obama, he is the twin of Malcolm X.
Uhm super 8 was introduced in 1965...
makes me want to puke.
:)
Well, whatever the media, you get the picture.........
If Obama is planning on skimming his usual 10 % off of his $ 447,000,000,000.00 Jobs Bill, then he just might be planning to retire in comfort back in Kenya. Win or loose, he would still get his 44.7 Billion dollars.
Why else would lame duck Obama ask to get so much money from our bankrupt Nation, with only 13 months left before his re-election?
“As WND previously reported, Polland has demonstrated that during the 2008 presidential election campaign, the White House website posted an image of a short-form Obama Certification of Live Birth that actually was a forgery created by Polland...”
This proves that George W. Bush was working with the Obama Campaign, not only to get Obama elected, but by also defrauding the American people.
Why else would the White House website post the Obama BC?
Now he has at least three! Collect the whole set!
If you tuned into On The Record with Greta yesterday evening she played the audio of Donald Trump on a joint telephone townhall with Michele Bachmann. He was responding to a question and talked about how he left the race when he was on top and that the other candidates should learn from him because he went after China for currency manipulation, wanting to bring manufacturing jobs back to America and questioning Obama on his birth certificate which ultimately forced Obama to present something that the fraud didn’t want to willingly release.
Then he added that someone should continue looking further into it because something is fishy there.
I was shocked that part was edited out...Hannity also brought up the bc issue during his Great American panel show last night as well.
What do you say we go to court and ask a judge?
CC:
Mr. M. Rubio
Mr. R. Jindal
Corsi can't even get a story he wrote right, even when he links to it. I don't blame him, though; it's hard keeping up with Polarik's lies.
WND pushing shameless stupidity is hardly the equivalent of being “in the news”.
Go read: http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.146770/gov.uscourts.dcd.146770.39.0.pdf
Note the footnote:
“The Court is loath to dignify plaintiff’s allegations of fraud with a response on the merits. However, suffice it to say that plaintiff’s argument is premised on the incorrect assumption that Social Security numbers assigned prior to 1973 have any correlation to the recipient’s residence, see Employer Filing Instructions and Information, http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/stateweb.htm (“Prior to 1973, social security numbers were assigned by our field offices. The [first three] number[s] merely established that his/her card was issued by one of our offices in that State.”). Plaintiff’s entire premise is totally defeated by a cursory examination of this site, which demonstrates that plaintiff’s allegations lack any basis in fact.”
WND is a living document and must be interpreted within the spirit of the times.
Once a fairly regular listener to conservative talk radio ... Limbaugh, Hannity, mostly. Gave up on it when it was apparent the fix was in and they weren't going to go there in any meaningful way ... they got the memo and caved.
“WND is a living document”
You said it. Did you see what they did the other day?
- First WND reported that a judge had ordered Jack Abramoff’s book to be garnished.
- Then WND scrubbed that first article from its website, and published a second article reporting that a judge had NOT ordered any garnishment, and included a quote from Joseph Farah where he criticized the media for getting the story wrong (and ignoring that WND had reported it).
- Then WND scrubbed the second article too.
It was the biggest effort at obfuscation I’ve seen at WND since they based a whole Birther/Kagan article off some blogger’s claims, and then scrubbed the whole article when they realized that the main premise of the article was completely bogus.
The Supreme Court is loath to grant anyone standing in a case of forged documents relating to this President lest the facts brought forward by any plantiff might have some basis in reality. We are hiding from the Constitution here under our desks. “You are a citizen, therefore, you have no standing” is our new motto.
“Avoiding” is merely not going that direction. Thomas’s word was “evading” which brings slyness and sneakiness to their actions. That really speaks volumes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.