Skip to comments.
Republicans Advance Bill Targeting US Funding for UN: 'What are We Paying For?
CNSNews ^
| 10/15/2011
| Patrick Goodenough
Posted on 10/15/2011 4:45:17 PM PDT by katiedidit1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: katiedidit1
“Proponents say this would allow the U.S. and other member states to fund only those activities and agencies it regards as being efficiently managed, and in the national interest.” National interest? well, that should eliminate all funding:)
To: katiedidit1
Funny how the GOP never tries this when its in power.
3
posted on
10/15/2011 4:51:35 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: katiedidit1
Kick the UN to Europe.
Bulldoze the building into the river.
4
posted on
10/15/2011 4:52:23 PM PDT
by
hattend
(If I wanted you dead, you'd be dead. - Cameron Connor)
To: katiedidit1
American taxpayers account for 22 percent of the U.N.s regular operating budget and 27 percent of the separate peacekeeping budget in assessed dues. In addition the U.S. provides billions of dollars in voluntary contributions for various U.N. agencies. In FY 2010 the total U.S. contribution was $7.69 billion.
Somewhere around 200 countries on this planet (give or take a few thousand if you host the ABC Nightly News), and one is "assessed" a quarter of the bills. Sounds a lot like the current American tax system, where the few are paying for the many.
"Assessed". How many of those doing the assessing owe us money or take billions in our foreign aid dollars?
5
posted on
10/15/2011 4:56:13 PM PDT
by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: LostInBayport
How many of those doing the assessing owe us money or take billions in our foreign aid dollars? All of them?
Uncle Sugar is a sucker.
6
posted on
10/15/2011 4:57:38 PM PDT
by
hattend
(If I wanted you dead, you'd be dead. - Cameron Connor)
To: hattend
Amen, brother....preach it.
To: katiedidit1
I personally wouldn’t accept anything less than total elimination of the United Nations. It’s strictly a tool of the Marxist Left, and has been since its beginning.
8
posted on
10/15/2011 4:59:51 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: GeronL
Funny how the GOP never tries this when its in power. Exactly. If Bush had taken advantage of the oil for food scandal, he could have ended our participation in the UN. But he assiduously avoided doing so.
You know the RINOs are playing to the crowd when they talk about something only when they know it can't be passed.
9
posted on
10/15/2011 5:05:06 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius.)
To: katiedidit1
Hillary said Obama would veto it. However, got to love some of our Fla Republicans...”The bills author, committee chairwoman Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FLA.), told Thursdays markup hearing that the U.N. budget continues to climb.
What are we paying for? she asked, then cited repressive regimes membership on the Human Rights Council, a continuing anti-Israel bias, the elevation of member states like North Korea and Iran to leadership positions in various bodies, and corruption scandals.
To: GeronL
Reagan did it to UNESCO. It worked. The most corrupt brothel in the UN reluctantly cleaned up its act.
To: Cicero
Let's face it. Bush had a full plate, but there were a host of things he could have done that he just didn't bother to do. Clean up the State Dept, jerk the UN's chain, dittoes EPA and Dept Ed, etc. etc.
Oh well. We can hope for a more effective tomorrow.
To: hinckley buzzard
“cleaned up its act”
no such thing. These orgs should not exist.
13
posted on
10/15/2011 5:16:15 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: hattend
Move the whole s-—pile to Juarez.
If nothing else it would be funny to see these great dignitaries trying to dogpaddle the Rio.
To: katiedidit1
I think we need the UN to go find another country to house their bedbug infested offices.
15
posted on
10/15/2011 5:18:41 PM PDT
by
shield
(Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
To: katiedidit1
Does it need a law, which requires 0bama’s signature for it, or a no budget allocation would be enough to do so?
16
posted on
10/15/2011 5:20:14 PM PDT
by
paudio
(0bama is like a bad mechanic who couldn't fix your car; he just makes it worse. Get somebody else!)
To: katiedidit1
Get the US out of the UN
Get the UN out of the US
17
posted on
10/15/2011 5:23:09 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(Rerun: Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
To: katiedidit1
What? Make fat-ass secretariate workers look for real jobs? They’re liable to make trouble, or at least form a committee to examine ways and means of making trouble. They might even join Occupy Wall Street and get run over by scooters and scream a lot, until their diplomatic immunity is revoked.
18
posted on
10/15/2011 5:53:42 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: katiedidit1
Every country should pay the exact same amount to the UN - NOTHING! Screw the UN. Move it to the South Pole and let them party there.
19
posted on
10/15/2011 6:03:04 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(As the End Times draws near, remember the Bible WARNED of these times. Be ready!)
Are You A Whining FReeper?
Got A Gripe So You Won't Donate?
Click The Pic
Isn't That Like Setting Fire To Your Own Home?
When FR Is Gone, Where Will You Go Then?
20
posted on
10/15/2011 6:21:21 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson