Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Launches First Radio Ad in Iowa
Politics PA ^ | 10-12-11 | Staff

Posted on 10/14/2011 9:13:07 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA

In the spot, titled “Agree,” Santorum highlights all of the areas where he and his fellow GOP candidates don’t arrive at a consensus. He notes his disagreement with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney on “government run Romneycare.” He calls Texas Governor Rick Perry “dead wrong” for supporting in-state tuition rates for illegal immigrants. Santorum also vehemently opposes the Wall Street bailouts, which former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain supported.

However, the take away message of the ad is that Santorum and his fellow GOP contenders do agree on perhaps the most important issue: defeating Barack Obama in 2012. “Barack Obama has to go,” Santorum says, “And if there’s anything we’ve learned from his failed presidency, it’s that experience matters.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politicspa.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2012; ad; election; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Sal
OK, then why do you think Santorum endorsed Spector? Personally, I think the fact he last his last election by 17 points is a bigger factor.

Still, Santorum has been a great senator and I thank him for his valuable service--especially to the unborn.

41 posted on 10/15/2011 8:57:38 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Oh, also IIRC the major reason being for Bush's wanting Specter was that “he could win”. Well, if Bush and Santorum et al had supported Toomey, HE could have won.

Sadly, after disappointing everyone on MANY issues after Bush and Santorum bailed him out in the primary, Specter publicly said that Bush needed to nominate people who would not try to overturn Roe v. Wade which was opposite of Bush's and Santorum's position and then changed to the Democrat Party.

It has left a bitter taste and it's too bad, but that's reality.

42 posted on 10/15/2011 9:04:15 AM PDT by Sal (We want to run against Obama because he's the weakest boob since Carter. Even way worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

I think Santorum endorsed Specter because his President asked him to and maybe even believed he had a better chance to win than Toomey. Frankly I was disappointed that he went along on that road.

I liked a lot of things about Santorum, one being that he had the guts and honesty to realize that we are in a war with Islamic Fascism. There are a lot of things to like, but that bitter taste remains.

He lost his last election in ‘06, 2 years AFTER he had endorsed Specter and when Republicans were under huge assault by MSM/DNC lies about the Republican Party being corrupt and the Dems being the “drain the swamp” Party. It boggles the mind, but it was a very successful assault and Indies believed it.

I believe his Specter mistake played at least as much a part in his huge loss as the Dem assault because of Republican disappointment, especially as there were two full years of Specter’s treachery to absorb by Republican voters. IMO it was too bad and I hated to see him lose to something like Casey, but he did.


43 posted on 10/15/2011 9:37:54 AM PDT by Sal (We want to run against Obama because he's the weakest boob since Carter. Even way worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sal
I agree with pretty much all you said. It is ironic that now Republican primary voters hold it against Santorum that he endorsed Spector and it would be many independent voters who would not vote for Santorum because he has been painted with too much of a conservative brush.

I like Santorum and am sorry he hasn't gotten more traction.

We just do not have a perfect candidate and we all cherry pick an issue about someone without looking at the broad picture.

44 posted on 10/15/2011 10:21:26 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sal
I think Santorum endorsed Specter because his President asked him to...

Bingo. Bush and the RNC pushed him hard to do it and even threatened him financially for not getting on board.

45 posted on 10/15/2011 10:50:43 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Santorum has less baggage than the others, but I expect him to exit the race by December. It does seem like that the cozying up to Specter and GWB ruined Rick Santorum.


46 posted on 10/15/2011 11:48:05 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
All that said, it occurs to me that SPENDING is the issue. SCOPE OF GOVERNMENT is the issue. The mode of taxation is interesting. A radical reform is attractive at some point.

But the mode of taxation means NOTHING if the SPENDING and the SCOPE of government doesn't change. That should be Issue #1.

Hear, hear. And I wonder why Cain is offering a distraction from the main point. It is either because he is stupid or he is working for Ubama and the dems. He sure is giving them a lot of ammo.

47 posted on 10/15/2011 11:52:24 AM PDT by La Enchiladita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Bush and the RNC pushed him hard to do it and even threatened him financially for not getting on board.

I was quite sure about the push, but I didn't know about the financial threats. Bush was a lot better than Hussein, but I really like Bush less and less all the time.

48 posted on 10/15/2011 12:04:23 PM PDT by Sal (We want to run against Obama because he's the weakest boob since Carter. Even way worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sal

I think the real culprit in these thug tactics was Rove. Most of the misery that GOP is in today is because of his short sighted maneuvers to stay in power and win in ‘04.


49 posted on 10/15/2011 12:58:19 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Agreed! And he’s still causing trouble and doing harm, but more people are onto him now.


50 posted on 10/15/2011 2:43:01 PM PDT by Sal (We want to run against Obama because he's the weakest boob since Carter. Even way worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

You’re probably right about Rove. Another disappointment from the state of UT


51 posted on 10/15/2011 7:04:54 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson