Skip to comments.
Will tea party purists back imperfect Romney? (MSM says Tea Partiers can't win without Romney)
Communist News Network ^
| 2011-10-14
| Gloria Borger
Posted on 10/14/2011 6:29:56 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
After watching the GOP presidential debate the other night, it was hard to avoid this conclusion: Mitt Romney looks more and more like the GOP presidential nominee. He's the best debater. He's got his issues and his rejoinders down pat. He brushes away his opponents like lint on his lapel. And all with such ease.
That said, there's a teensy problem he just can't seem to beat: Conservatives don't like him. Or trust him. Or really want him to be the GOP nominee.
Sure, you say, Republicans never like their nominees, and they still manage to vote for them. There is truth to that: At this point in 2007, John McCain was still at 17% in the polls. Eventually, only Sarah Palin could make him palatable to conservatives. The Bushes were never right-wing faves. Neither were Richard Nixon or Gerald Ford. Even Ronald Reagan had candidates running to his right. And as for Bob Dole, well, he was suspect, but at least he was a war hero.
This year was supposed to be different. This was to be the time for the tea party to flourish and nominate a true believer. It's the moment, we were told, for an out-of-the-box Republican who would be against everything Barack Obama supports, like health care reform or bank bailouts.
Fine, except that Mitt Romney's Massachusetts health plan was a model for Obama (as the president fondly points out). And Romney told us during the debate that he supported the bank bailouts. ("Action had to be taken.")
If this keeps up, the tea partiers will be back at the harbor -- throwing themselves in.
Or, they can decide to suck it up and try to win.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 0call999bama; 2012gopprimary; backstabberromney; bigdigromney; biggovernment; bishopromney; bowb4romney; call0999bama; cnn; cowardromney; deathpanels; democrats4romney; dirtytrickromney; dnc4romney; dogabuseromney; drivebymedia; enemedia; fakebadgeromney; fascistmedia; fascistpig; fascistromney; homosexualagenda; justsayno2romney; liberalmedia; liberalromney; loserromney; misogynistromney; msm; msm4romney; mythromney; obamacare; obamadeathpanels; obamneycare; romney2decide4u; romney2lose; romney4911mosque; romney4abortion; romney4bailouts; romney4deathcare; romney4fascism; romney4gaymarriage; romney4iag; romney4nwo; romney4obama; romney4obamacare; romney4romney; romney4sharia; romney4soros; romney4tarp; romney4taxes; romneyantigop; romneybadgov; romneybots4obama; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; romneyfees; romneymarriage; romneytaxes; romneytruthfile; saboteurromney; socialism; soros4romney; spoilerromney; statistpig; statistromney; stenchofromney; teaparty; vichy; vichyromney; zcall999bama; zot; zots4romneybots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: FReepers; everyone; All
DONATE!
Immediate Action needed!
Donate to Free Republic! Click Here!
Do You Stand for Free Republic?
Do You Support Your Forum With Your Donations?
41
posted on
10/14/2011 6:53:08 PM PDT
by
onyx
(You're here on FR so, support it! Compiling New Sarah Palin Ping List! Tell me if you want on it!)
To: rabscuttle385
Hey, Communist News Network.....and RNC...
Mitt Romney is a mayonnaise sandwich on white bread.
(sharpen the pitchforks...)
42
posted on
10/14/2011 6:54:32 PM PDT
by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: rabscuttle385
Tea party purist? Here's how their records compare:
Issue: |
Obama |
Romney |
Pro-Abortion |
check |
check |
Gun-grabber |
check |
check |
Gay rights |
check |
check |
Gov forced healthcare |
check |
check |
Tax payer funded abortion |
check |
check |
Man-made global warming |
check |
check |
Liberal judges |
check |
check |
Liberal appointees |
check |
check |
Ted Kennedy pal |
check |
check |
Proven liar |
check |
check |
Fraud |
check |
check |
Liberal Progressive |
check |
check |
Enemy of the tea party |
check |
check |
Enemy of Bush/Reagan |
check |
check |
Enemy within |
check |
check |
Enemy of Liberty |
check |
check |
Useful idiot |
check |
check |
Works across the aisle |
no |
yes |
43
posted on
10/14/2011 6:54:32 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: rabscuttle385
The Tea Party as Fast Eddie Felson (Paul Newman) in the Hustler, at the end where George C. Scott (the ultimate RHINO and seducer of Piper Laurie, is trying to hold onto Fast Eddie:
[Constitutional Conservative Tea Party speaking] : You don't know what winning is, Bert [ie GOP establishment]]. You're a loser. 'Cause you're dead inside and ya can't live unless you make everything dead around ya! [ie sell out our Tea Party principals]] Too high, Bert - the price is too high. If I take it, [ie settle for Romney]] she never lived. She never died. [ie there never was a Tea Party movement]] And we both know that's not true, Bert, don't we, huh? [ie its too late, the country is too far down the road to socialism & crony capitalism to settle for the business-as-usual Republican-Lite-Rhino].
44
posted on
10/14/2011 6:55:36 PM PDT
by
jobim
To: onyx; DoughtyOne
WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITHOUT FREE REPUBLIC?Blinking text offends me.
To: rabscuttle385
Any other candidate but Romney, he’s a crackhead
46
posted on
10/14/2011 6:56:54 PM PDT
by
Java4Jay
To: rabscuttle385
Believe that we should keep our eye on
experience per critical needs of our country. We need Newt AND Herman.
Newt's baggage, nothing compared to that carried around by Obama. Realize and fear; the lack of Republican 'Will' here; but we could make it happen.
If only; IMHO . .
47
posted on
10/14/2011 6:57:24 PM PDT
by
cricket
(Let Freedom Ring. . .and Thank You, Steve Jobs...)
To: Jim Robinson
To: HapaxLegamenon
Ronald Reagan? He’ll never win.
49
posted on
10/14/2011 6:58:36 PM PDT
by
DManA
To: rabscuttle385
50
posted on
10/14/2011 7:00:22 PM PDT
by
onyx
(You're here on FR so, support it! Compiling New Sarah Palin Ping List! Tell me if you want on it!)
To: rabscuttle385
One more:
Issue: |
Obama |
Romney |
Architect of ObamaCare |
no |
yes |
51
posted on
10/14/2011 7:00:58 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: cricket
Newt needs to earn his conservative credentials first!
Until he does, he rides in the back of the bus.
52
posted on
10/14/2011 7:02:05 PM PDT
by
Randy Larsen
(I Stand With Cain!)
To: cricket
Newt’s baggage is nothing compared to Romney’s.
53
posted on
10/14/2011 7:02:16 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: Marie
"Will tea party purists back imperfect Romney?" NO!! I will write in Cain if I have to. I agree with you 100%. No way I will cast a vote for another phony Conservative. No more Fords, no more Doles, no more McCains ... my one vote won't make a difference, but at least this time I "won't get fooled again" as the song goes.
54
posted on
10/14/2011 7:02:57 PM PDT
by
CapnJack
To: rabscuttle385
This is Gloria Borger, for Gosh Sakes! She is a brainwashed shill or maybe an undercover worker for the overthrow of this nation as we know it. Just no brains; a parrot spouting the party line.
vaudine
55
posted on
10/14/2011 7:03:21 PM PDT
by
vaudine
To: Jim Robinson
That's a keeper. Try as they (MSM and GOP Elites) might, there is no way Mitt will be shoved down our throats. Mitt will get no southern states.
After NH, it's downhill for the Obama-lite.
What many on our side don't realize is that if by some miracle Mitt is elected, his primary goal will be to screw conservatives.
Mitt is a pure Statist -- it's in his DNA.
56
posted on
10/14/2011 7:04:00 PM PDT
by
sand88
To: GeronL
True.
Neither Romney or Perry are true contenders for grass roots Republicans.
My cat could win the election against Obama next year.
Why should Republicans select a RINO for our candidate as POTUS?
We will either select a true Republican this time as our nominee, or spend what is left of our valuable time and money preparing ourselves for the coming revolution induced by the anarchists.
No to both Romney and Perry, neither one of them make the cut for primary voters.
Cain and Santorum are the only real Republican contenders.
Neither have been seriously vetted yet.
Does anyone besides me think that odd?
57
posted on
10/14/2011 7:07:36 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
(Rent a clue.)
To: doc1019
“Mitt gets nominated, I dont vote.”
Don’t forget about the other races! Reps., Senators, state and federal.
Just leave President blank or write in a name. But please go vote for the other offices.
58
posted on
10/14/2011 7:10:02 PM PDT
by
CapnJack
To: rabscuttle385
Our tea party fight song: WE DON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!
After the disaster that was McCain, WITH would we vote for Romney?
To: Jim Robinson
Good one, Jim.
I’d rather this country go to hell under a D than an R. If we elect Romney, then the electorate will be confused and frustrated, believing that neither side has anything to offer and that there’s no point in a republic. We’ll lose everything.
We cannot contribute to this.
I will never accept Romney as our nominee.
60
posted on
10/14/2011 7:13:53 PM PDT
by
Marie
(Cain 9s Have Teeth)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson