Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Underwear bomber' judge won't block genital photo or the word 'bomb'
CNN ^ | 10/11/2011 | CNN Wire Staff

Posted on 10/11/2011 1:29:04 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd

Detroit (CNN) -- The judge in the federal trial of alleged "underwear bomber" Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab refused Tuesday to prevent the prosecution from calling the device he allegedly carried a "bomb."

U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds also refused to exclude a photo of AbdulMutallab's burned genitals from the evidence.

Before the prosecution began its opening statement, defense standby counsel Anthony Chambers asked that the prosecutors not be allowed to use the words "explosive device" or "bomb" during the trial. It's up to the jury to decide whether the device AbdulMutallab was carrying was a bomb, Chambers argued.

"I'm going to deny that motion," responded Edmunds. "It makes no sense whatsoever."

As for the photo, the judge said it did not seem "unusually prejudicial."

AbdulMutallab, accused of trying to detonate an explosive device in his underwear aboard a Christmas 2009 flight to Detroit, has said he will represent himself.

~snip~

When a flight attendant asked him what he had in his pockets, he called it "an explosive device," Tukel said.

Tukel added that AbdulMutallab was very verbal and spoke with many people, including some on the flight and officials once the flight landed.

The prosecution also called its first witness Tuesday, Michael Zantow, who was on the flight one row behind AbdulMutallab. Zantow, a 20-year veteran of the Army, was among those who tried to restrain the defendant.

Within a minute of the loud sound on the plane, a passenger said to AbdulMutallab, "Hey man, your pants are on fire!" Zantow testified. The passenger repeated himself two or three times, and AbdulMutallab did not respond, Zantow said.

The jury is made up of three white men and nine women -- six white, two African-American and one Southeast Asian.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allahfubar; crotchburning; panties; pantsonfire; pantybomber; underwearbomber
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
"Hey man, your pants are on fire!" Zantow testified. The passenger repeated himself two or three times, and AbdulMutallab did not respond, Zantow said.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just exactly how does one respond when on a plane - a bomb has gone off in your pants - and people are screaming "Hey man, your pants are on fire!"

1 posted on 10/11/2011 1:29:13 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; Slings and Arrows; martin_fierro

Pinging the experts RE: this question:

Just exactly how does one respond when on a plane - a bomb has gone off in your pants - and people are screaming “Hey man, your pants are on fire!”


2 posted on 10/11/2011 1:30:53 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
"I'm going to deny that motion," responded Edmunds. "It makes no sense whatsoever."

What?

This judge is encumbered by an inordinate amount of common sense.

3 posted on 10/11/2011 1:30:58 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Within a minute of the loud sound on the plane, a passenger said to AbdulMutallab, "Hey man, your pants are on fire!"

Helpful people are helpful.

4 posted on 10/11/2011 1:32:18 PM PDT by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

An old quote:

“A man who defends himself in court has a fool for a lawyer.”


5 posted on 10/11/2011 1:33:37 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain ... USS Iowa BB 161)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyTeach

Why is he in a Federal Court?


6 posted on 10/11/2011 1:36:15 PM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
The jury is made up of three white men and nine women -- six white, two African-American and one Southeast Asian.

I'm confused... Are the two Africans the only American citizens on the jury? Do we now have Southeast Asians on American juries (Do they still get 10 cents per mile for travel)? And how about the whites (the only group NOT to be capitalized - for some strange reason), what is their nationality? This situation is SO mixed-up!

7 posted on 10/11/2011 1:37:04 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too... @Onelifetogive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Just exactly how does one respond when on a plane - a bomb has gone off in your pants - and people are screaming “Hey man, your pants are on fire!”

"Not a problem - they were on fire when I put them on !"

8 posted on 10/11/2011 1:37:48 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

Seems to me that the defense was reaching by saying that the jury would be the ones to decide whether it was a bomb. The jury is there to determine his guilt or innocence on the charges; it is FACT that he had an “explosive device” (AKA BOMB). Thank goodness for sanity by the judge.


9 posted on 10/11/2011 1:38:00 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Looks Like I'll Be A Witness For The Defense In The Underwear Bomber Case
10 posted on 10/11/2011 1:40:30 PM PDT by FritzG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyTeach

“A man who defends himself in court has a fool for a lawyer.”

________________________________________________

I had always heard he had a fool for a client. But I guess its the same difference.


11 posted on 10/11/2011 1:40:56 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
12 posted on 10/11/2011 1:41:24 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
13 posted on 10/11/2011 1:41:33 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
It's up to the jury to decide whether the device AbdulMutallab was carrying was a bomb, Chambers argued.

There goes the "What device?" defense.

14 posted on 10/11/2011 1:44:01 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too... @Onelifetogive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I noticed they did not charge his with attempted murder. I missed it.

Can he get the death penalty? Does anyone know?


15 posted on 10/11/2011 1:44:05 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FritzG

From your link....

“I even saw him when he lit his fake bomb and his crotch was burning and he never makes a peep.”

I must say; this wack-job must have ice water running through his you-know-what.

If my crotch was on fire - you can be dang sure the whole dang plane would know it.


16 posted on 10/11/2011 1:45:24 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

What do you do when your Hot Pants catch on fire?

You turn on your Panty hose.


17 posted on 10/11/2011 1:45:48 PM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Just exactly how does one respond when on a plane - a bomb has gone off in your pants - and people are screaming “Hey man, your pants are on fire!”

Not that I would put a bomb in my pants, but if my pants are on fire, I'm going to be wanting that coke or water you were nursing hoping to make last for the rest of the flight. You can keep your 151 Bacardi, I don't want that.

18 posted on 10/11/2011 1:47:04 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Why is he in a Federal Court?

As apposed to Gitmo? I think he should be tried as a terrorist/war criminal, not a civilian criminal. He should also be beheaded have his body fed to pigs live on Al Zajeera immediately following the military tribunal at Gitmo.

19 posted on 10/11/2011 1:47:42 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Your Honor, if a man’s pants are literally on fire it is prima facie evidence that he is LYING!


20 posted on 10/11/2011 1:47:53 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson