Posted on 10/11/2011 12:12:41 PM PDT by Cato in PA
In a radio interview just now, Herman Cain previewed his Tuesday night debate plan: Im going after Romney.
"Im not going after Perry. I dont need to go after Perry," Cain said, per POLITICO's Juana Summers.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Nice try.
Posting stuff you can’t back up is not making a point, skippy.
Agree 100%. Since 1988, the Republican Party has been saddled with an inferior nominee who was either not elected, or if elected, did nothing to advance conservatism. In each case, the nominee was the "choice" of the money men and the "movers and shakers" of the establishment.
We haven't had a true "president of the people" since Ronald Reagan and that was the last president I remember that the rank and file was actually excited about.
I had my hopes set on Sarah Palin this go-around but after taking a good look at Herman Cain and all that he has achieved (and overcome) in his life, I am more than satisfied with Cain as a Palin alternative. Screw the money men, if Cain can retain the conservative base and win some of the early primaries, he's got an excellent chance for the nomination. And while campaign money might be tight in the early going, he's grabbing the headlines and the media attention. People will soon be tripping over themselves to donate to his campaign as they get to know him better.
I'm disgusted by the demonrats and slightly less so by the Rinorats.
If there was a strong 3rd party challenger, I'd vote for him or her.
However, Herman Cain might just be the person who can help me feel good about voting for the Republican candidate this time.
I'll bet that there are lots of registered voters who feel the same way.
Do you and your other Perry supporters have any clue how remarks like that turn people off; not only to you but to the person you support? This IS FreeRepublic; NOT DU, NOT KOS, NOT HP. Yet just because we don't see eye-to-eye on a candidate you choose to defame us. We're not the bad a$$es here, YOU ARE. It's this kind of stuff that has earned you the defamation you so well deserve.
I will never support your candidate. If it comes to having to vote form him in the general in order to dethrone Obama I will, but I will be holding my nose just as I did with McCain back in '08. He is anathema to me. And so are you. You should be ashamed of your collective selves for making those types of comments about your fellow FReepers. Shame on you and shame on Perry for you are a reflection of him.
Now, get lost!
1 - He is not eligible.
2 :
Romney for Obama in 2008
The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off .hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
OK : )
Not necessarily. He has an image now. He's made an unseemly remark about those of us who disagree with his in-state tuition stance. It will take more than attacking Obama to overcome that. look at the polls. 63% disagree with in-state tuition illegals. 53% of Hispanics. No, his problem goes beyond simply an change of tactics or a smoother delivery. The polls show his problems run deep.
The way I heard it was that Cain was asked if he would consider a veep spot and he said he would for anyone but Perry.
Most people felt that kinda meant Romney as the others are way back in the pack.
Either way it was a gratuitious insult to Perry and one of the two big issues I have with Cain, the other being that he took the WaPo’s rock story seriously and blamed Perry .
I really thought better of Herman Cain just a short time ago. If he does go after Willard tonight he’ll regain some of the respect he’s lost with conservatives. Otherwise, the damage is done and Romney walks away, scot-free and unscathed.
Hannity said its not being televised
That’s MR Skippy to you and Grand Master S to my friends. ;-)
Then again, maybe Perry is the real target and Cain is looking to get Perry to let his guard down.
Just noticed this is from Politico. Why use them as a source for anything - a bit of truth but it’s always filled w/their propaganda.
What you said. Perry supporters are Perry’s worst enemies.
Yup, that would be real smart, gain "respect" from Perry supporters by joining the Debate Clown Club of Perry and Romney.
I don't think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.