Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

More on the U.N. efforts to disarm us.
1 posted on 10/10/2011 11:31:41 PM PDT by Watchdog85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Watchdog85

740,000 gun-related deaths?

OK. How many people were killed with knives or strangled to death? I’m sure it is far more than 740k, so why don’t we ban knives and hands? Or better yet, why not just eradicate Islam? That should save a few million lives every year.


2 posted on 10/10/2011 11:57:06 PM PDT by Ernie Kaputnik ((It's a mad, mad, mad world.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85
Have very little to say to the gun grabbers; other than,
Stalin
Hitler
Pol Pot
Mao Tse Tung
Mussolini
Castro
these are just the ones that come off the top my head for the 20th century.
All of these people required that their citizens relinquish their fire arms for the safety of all.
I guess it is a lot safer to send your citizens to places like Auschwitz, Belzec, Treblinka, The Gulags and the killing Fields when they no longer have the means to resist.
3 posted on 10/11/2011 12:03:13 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85
I still insist that congress and the president do NOT have the authority to amend, suspend, revoke, edit, delete, suborn, or otherwise make ANY part of our constitution or bill of rights subject to U.N. mandate or treaty. A "Treaty" is not a valid means of amending our rights, the U.N. has no authority within the U.S. borders. I know, there is precedent, that does not mean that the alleged precedent is legitimate and correct. "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it."
16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177 late 2nd, section 256: "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
-- William Pitt "If by the mere force of numbers a majority should deprive a minority in any clearly written constitutional right, it might, in a moral point of view, justify revolution--and certainly would if such a right were a vital one." -- Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, 1861
4 posted on 10/11/2011 1:02:47 AM PDT by Loyal Sedition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85
Yep. Our Rats are just globalists and socialists, who can't take off their masks quite yet.

(They must look at the Occupiers doing the Marxist Echo Chant and think, "cool it you guys! Not yet! You're blowing our cover.")

9 posted on 10/11/2011 5:48:05 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85
The U. N. can kiss my patoot and have my guns -- bullets first. Ditto for any US pol gun-grabber who attempts to take away my God Given Right.

But that's all hypothetical for now. I lost all my guns in a 'tragic' boating accident. And besides losing all my guns, all my ammo and extensive knife collection went down too.

see, when I say 'tragic', I mean it ;-)

15 posted on 10/11/2011 10:58:21 AM PDT by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson