Posted on 10/06/2011 6:57:11 PM PDT by RobinMasters
I’ve been avoiding this topic just because the arc of the debate is so predictable. First comes the outrage from the left, eager to help Warren get a sympathy bump in the polls by casting her as the victim of sneering frat boy Scott Brown.
Then comes the pushback from the right, intent on recovering any inch of lost ground by reminding the left that she took the first shot in sneering at Brown’s appearance years ago in Cosmo. Then the left has a fainting spell at the idea that the right would defend this horrible, horrible woman-hater, and then the right tells them to suck it up and learn to take a joke because politics ain’t beanbag. And so here we are.
INTERVIEWER: Have you officially responded to Elizabeth Warren’s comment about how she didn’t take her clothes off?
SCOTT BROWN: [LAUGHTER] Thank God.
INTERVIEWER: [LAUGHTER] That’s what I said! I said, “Look, can you blame a good-looking guy for wanting to, you know…”
SCOTT BROWN: You know what, listen: Bottom line is, you know, I didn’t go to Harvard. You know, I went to the school of hard knocks. And I did whatever I had to do to pay for school. And for people who know me, and know what I’ve been through, mom and dad married and divorced four times each. You know, some real challenges growing up. You know, whatever. You know, let them throw stones. I did what I had to do. But not for having that opportunity, I never would have been able to pay for school, and never would have gone to school, and I wouldn’t probably be talking to you. So, whatever.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
For all the bitching about Brown, when it comes to a republican president he WILL vote to confirm our judges as opposed to Warren. That alone is reason to support him. And yes he is FAR from being perfect. But that’s the reality of a Massachseetts republican. Ward and Romney could never be elected in that state if they ran as conservatives.
I’m not that fond of Scott Brown; he’s not conservative enough for me. But I’ll happily vote for him again, no matter WHO his Democrat opponent turns out to be.
Funny answer if it is the only thing he has done right.
Pose naked for money, peddle your daughters to the masses, what’s next?
Wait—so the Democrats are interested in morality again? Since when?
Are you in Massachusetts? If so, take a look at #16 and see if you have any comment. Thanks,
Most likely a lesbian just like Janet Nap and Janet Reno.
He’s a snappy prostitute.
Actually, it is the confused response trying to make sense of a young man who had been sexually and morally stunted after suffering homosexual molestation as a kid. He viewed himself as the sex object of horney men. And now he’s still victimized by the whole mess in trying to make it all right.
“He’s a snappy prostitute.”
Well, a slack one is no use.
He’s no use to anyone. He’s a morally broken man which is why he’s a Rino.
My point is that he is an improvement over Dead Ted.
I stand by that point. He probably won’t survive the challenge by the blonde Mao Tse Tung anyway.
He’s as useful to us as a naked, sexually confused Mao, so who cares.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.