[Diogenesis]

MNJohnnie is correct.

Perry could have NOT been a RINO, but he was PROUD OF IT
in the debate, and called Americans “heartless”.

Perry could have shown he was a contender against
Romney, but he only showed weakness.

Perry is all talk, all RINO, and little evidence
of conservative past.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

You have ZERO credibility.

Why would I take anything you say as “correct.”

[Caipirabob]

#7 Agreed. Mark Levine stated it best the other night when he said basically that "Perry can't debate/sell conservatism because at best it doesn't formulate his core values, and he doesn't truly believe in it."

My wife, who was raised in an environment where attacks from socialist FARC guerillas was a daily reality can sniff out a scumbag socialist sycophant.

She never said Perry was one of those, but she summed him up by saying "I don't trust him, I don't like him."

I won't translate what she said about romney.

Cheers!

[Night Hides Not]

What's it going to take to get over the chatter on the "heartless" remark.

Perry stood strong during the last budget, and closed a projected multi-billion dollar shortfall by cutting spending, not by raising taxes.

Can Romney say the same thing?