Posted on 10/05/2011 3:55:32 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Our political Quote of the Day is from The Politico’s John Martin, Maggie Haberman and Ben Smith who say this is former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s moment and if he doesn’t seize it it will be gone:
[quote] If Mitt Romney can’t start locking up the GOP nomination now, he may never be able to.
The former Massachusetts governor’s charmed path toward the presidential nomination was made even smoother Tuesday when New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie opted out of a campaign and recommended that voters choose the candidate with the “best chance” of beating President Barack Obama.
No white knight from Trenton, N.J., or anywhere else is riding into the race as the establishment’s savior. Romney’s would-be chief rival for the nomination, Rick Perry, is dropping in the polls amid doubts from conservatives and pragmatists. And the one candidate on the rise, Herman Cain, is running for president in between stops to hawk a new book.
“In tax policy, this would be known as the unlocking effect,” former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie said about the effect of Christie’s decision. “A lot of folks who’ve been waiting to see other candidates get in the race will begin moving to declared candidates.”
Crowed Romney adviser Ron Kaufman: “This is the end of ‘Waiting for Superman.’”
But for all the same reasons Christie’s decision ends the uncertainty that hovered over Romney, it also launches a frantic period for his campaign. He’s now under intense pressure to consolidate the Republican establishment behind his candidacy and build up the coveted and self-reinforcing sense of inevitability his candidacy has lacked to date.
And there were some signs in the hours after Christie’s decision that the movement to Romney had begun. [end quote]
But for political junkies the REAL tip in recent days will be what happens in another area of the political scene: what will Rush Limbaugh say? Will Limbaugh and other talk show hosts start to clamor for ABR (anybody but Romney) and the political conventional wisdom be shaken up by former Godfather CEO Herman Cane’s number go up more? Will (don’t hold your breath on this one) former Alaska Govenor Sarah Palin give up her more than a year political tease that has helped her collect money for her associated groups and shock everyone by giving up her Fox News contract and enter the race?
It seems about time, now, for some stories quoting anonymous sources to claim that Jeb Bush is really reallly really seriously no joking guaranteed thinking about jumping into the race (just recycle the old Christie stories, news media, and with a few changes you can run the same ones).
Romney’s lack of respect inability to generate enthusiasm within the GOP has almost morphed into a humiliation for him.
I can remember Republicans being more excited and breathless about Bob Dole.
But if big money is now starting to swing his way with Christie out and the GOP establishment’s thirst to get some candidate out there who is a clear frontrunner and seemingly inevitable nominee, Romney should have a better shot at it.
The little qualifier: expect Rick Perry to raise a ton of money. And expect the ABR movement to look for a way, anyway, to start to excuse Perry’s failings as a debater (which Perry can begin to obliterate in the next debate) and increasing heap of political baggage.
There are now two serious anti-Romney’s: Cain and Perry. The questions become a)which one becomes the serious alternative and b)will the GOP establishment go to the mat to try and help Romney or hold its nose (and breath) and go for Perry?
But at this precise moment in time you can safely say:
It is a wide open field. Can Romney (finally) change that?
how about ...
Perry is merely a different face of the same GOP Establishment coin. He is Bush's "compassionate conservative" moderate vrs the liberal wing of the GOP in Romney. It's the 2000 McCain vrs Bush fight all over again.
Perry is Romney lite. Like Bush he is another social conservative/political moderate talking tough to win the GOP primary. He will then go to DC and be a good little Establishment water-boy just like Bush.
The difference between Perry and Romney is which issues they will choose to focus on. Perry will be a staunch social conservative big spending, crony capitalist, Romney will be a social liberal, big spending, big government crony capitalist.
When give the choice of either Romney or Perry, Conservatives should say "neither".
No mittneycare.
No matter how many times you or the other Palin-Paul or whomever posters say that, it doesn’t make it true.
It's all about the money.
MNJohnnie is correct.
Perry could have NOT been a RINO, but he was PROUD OF IT
in the debate, and called Americans “heartless”.
Perry could have shown he was a contender against
Romney, but he only showed weakness.
Perry is all talk, all RINO, and little evidence
of conservative past.
You are right, only history will do that.
1. Illegals in-state tuition
2. legislating by executive order
Anyone else care to add to the list? I stopped worrying about counting at those two.
This is one of the reasons you Perry supporters are in such trouble. This arrogant assumption that we MUST choose Rino A to stop Rino B.
No, we do not.
Well, “NEVER” works for me.
(If Mittens was a Gypsy, he could read the tea leaves. As it is, he’ll just have to consult the skidmarks in his magic underpants.)
Even if Perry were great now, there’s not enough time since he supported Gore.
You have ZERO credibility.
Why would I take anything you say as “correct.”
Cute.
I hope you’ll enjoy Romney’s candidacy and Obama’s 4 more years. Because that’s what you’re going to get by killing off a good conservative candidate.
Dittos
All true. However, Romney will expand the EPA and Perry is against the EPA. But will Perry ignore the Green corporatists and cut the EPA?
“Quote of the Day: It’s Now or Never for Mitt Romney.”
I say NEVER.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2788029/posts
Romney won’t repeal ObamaCare and you for some stupid reason think I want that bit of limp toast to stand for conservatism?
Wake up dearie, we are playing with real marbles now. I have argued for the longest time now that we do not need to be deciding now but instead focused on vetting. If you are incapable of vetting until it is time to enter the voting booth, you are doing everyone, including yourself a huge disservice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.