Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

The fact that they didn’t use “protected” crap, you could transfer back and forth (unlike the iPod), and it had what I thought was better potential, but it came on too late to even seriously challenge the iPod. Yeah, it was ugly as hell, but I’ll take ugly and functional over my iPod, which is currently gathering dust. Now, anywhere I have a cell signal, I have music (and can buy it if I want, but haven’t wanted to yet.)


9 posted on 10/04/2011 2:35:20 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-eyed killer of the deep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: OCCASparky

Uh, didn’t use protected crap? The Zune’s DRM was initially more restrictive than the iPod’s, and it was Apple that was pushing to kill DRM, not Microsoft.

Add to that that the Zune’s DRM required you to resync your Zune with your computer on a regular basis or it erased your music... or sometimes it would just erase it for no apparent reason... Sorry, no, that was pretty sad.


11 posted on 10/04/2011 2:38:38 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson