No, it’s Al Queda that is suffering revenge attacks by the USA. As for Al-Awlaki - he’s a 14th. Amendment citizen who had no allegiance to the US. He went overseas to attack and kill Americans. He’s (was) a combatant, not a private citizen of a country he disavowed.
Because he was a combatant and the the Congress declared war on his country no- ummm would you believe his religion how about his ideology... would you believe his...?
I've seen this phrase more than once today. Kinda makes my skin crawl.
You start poopooing amendments and next thing I'll be hearing is the left saying that I have a "2nd Amendment gun". If one amendment is less than, all are in danger.
Now, if we can get rid of "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." tomorrow, I'd be pleased.
He was an unlawful combatant per LOAC.