[Vigilanteman]

John Paul Stevens is relevant because??????????

[who_would_fardels_bear]

"is relevant because"

Because of this argument. Whether or not it is good is for legal scholars to decide, but just because it came from his lips does not make it automatically invalid.

Too much ad hominem around here lately. It's illogical and lazy.

[savagesusie]

John Paul Stevens is one of the disillusioned illogical crowd that thinks there is a “Right” for a “marriage” of two persons determined by dysfunctional, destructive, nihilistic behaviors. Come to think of it...he probably believes polygamy should be legal also.

He totally disregards legal definitions and precedents and the Constitution of the US which states that Just Law is based on Right Reason according to Nature. It is the fundamental principle of our legal system....he adopts Wrong reason according to Barney Frank.

[hflynn]

Ninety-one-year-old retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens told Bloomberg News that he thinks President Obama's health care law will pass constitutional muster.

Poor Stevens, he must be looking at the Cuban Constitution.

[bert]

HE SAYS WHAT THE LSM WANTS TH HEAR AND SETS THE TEMPLATE FOR DISSING SCOTUS