Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired justice says Supreme Court likely to uphold health care law
Yahoo News ^ | Wed, Sep 28, 2011 | Liz Goodwin

Posted on 09/29/2011 2:07:32 PM PDT by Red Steel

Ninety-one-year-old retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens told Bloomberg News that he thinks President Obama's health care law will pass constitutional muster.

He referenced a 2005 Supreme Court decision that held the federal government could outlaw state-sanctioned medical marijuana even if the substance didn't cross state lines, which was based on a broad interpretation of the commerce clause.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News
KEYWORDS: commerceclause; johnpaulstevens; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 09/29/2011 2:07:35 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
John Paul Stevens is relevant because??????????
2 posted on 09/29/2011 2:10:45 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"He referenced a 2005 Supreme Court decision that held the federal government could outlaw state-sanctioned medical marijuana even if the substance didn't cross state lines, which was based on a broad interpretation of the commerce clause."

And of course, the Federal Government can mandate that terminally ill patients can smoke only Federal Government supplied marijuana to ease their pain.

3 posted on 09/29/2011 2:11:05 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So let’s see, an old leftist, activist justice is saying that Obama care passes constitutional muster . . . why am I not surprised?


4 posted on 09/29/2011 2:11:25 PM PDT by Sudetenland (There can be no freedom without God--What man gives, man can take away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

That’s why the doddering old fool is retired:

“He referenced a 2005 Supreme Court decision that held the federal government could outlaw state-sanctioned medical marijuana even if the substance didn’t cross state lines”

Nobody was forcing anyone to buy Marijuana. Obamacare forces people to buy insurance. Big difference - MORON!


5 posted on 09/29/2011 2:12:11 PM PDT by PhilosopherStone1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Amazing..

91 years old, and retired, and Stevens still manages to be wrong on every issue....

Ya gotta admire the consistency... ;)


6 posted on 09/29/2011 2:12:38 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Even though 80% of the people in this country don’t want ObamaCare? Amazing.....just amazing.


7 posted on 09/29/2011 2:12:53 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Worst thing that ever happened to Americans - “the commerce clause”


8 posted on 09/29/2011 2:13:03 PM PDT by wesagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I’m pretty sure John Paul Stevens has been dead for quite some time. This must be a mistake.


9 posted on 09/29/2011 2:13:31 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
"is relevant because"

Because of this argument. Whether or not it is good is for legal scholars to decide, but just because it came from his lips does not make it automatically invalid.

Too much ad hominem around here lately. It's illogical and lazy.

10 posted on 09/29/2011 2:15:05 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll
I’m pretty sure John Paul Stevens has been dead for quite some time

Between the ears anyway.

11 posted on 09/29/2011 2:16:27 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wesagain

It’s not the Commerce Clause’s fault, it’s the Progressivists’ abuse of it in the name of a “living Constitution”.


12 posted on 09/29/2011 2:17:09 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Figures this douchebag was named by the RINO disaster Gerald Ford.


13 posted on 09/29/2011 2:18:14 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Since when the activist judges give a hoot about what majority of people think? They know better than the rest of us peons!
14 posted on 09/29/2011 2:20:02 PM PDT by federal__reserve (Peace through strength has worked better than peace via appeasement in history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Dear Justice Stevens. The fed can outlaw medical marijuana because marijuana is already illegal. Duh....


15 posted on 09/29/2011 2:20:55 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

John Paul Stevens is one of the disillusioned illogical crowd that thinks there is a “Right” for a “marriage” of two persons determined by dysfunctional, destructive, nihilistic behaviors. Come to think of it...he probably believes polygamy should be legal also.

He totally disregards legal definitions and precedents and the Constitution of the US which states that Just Law is based on Right Reason according to Nature. It is the fundamental principle of our legal system....he adopts Wrong reason according to Barney Frank.


16 posted on 09/29/2011 2:23:13 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Retired justice says Supreme Court likely to uphold health care law

To paraphrase Pelosi, have they read it...

17 posted on 09/29/2011 2:27:17 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This makes me nervous. I hope Mark Levin addresses this today.


18 posted on 09/29/2011 2:29:48 PM PDT by freeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Ninety-one-year-old retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens told Bloomberg News that he thinks President Obama's health care law will pass constitutional muster.

Poor Stevens, he must be looking at the Cuban Constitution.

19 posted on 09/29/2011 2:30:02 PM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

It is true.

They didn’t ens Campaign Finance reform and they didn’t protect property rights when they got the chance.

SCOTUS is totally unreliable.


20 posted on 09/29/2011 2:32:39 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson