Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christie seriously considering presidential bid after GOP prodding (The Big Tease again)
NYPost ^ | Thursday September 29, 2011 | JOSH MARGOLIN

Posted on 09/29/2011 6:22:52 AM PDT by Bigtigermike

After months of hedging, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is giving serious thought to jumping into the ring for a GOP presidential run -- and could make his decision next week, The Post has learned.

The announcement may come as soon as Monday, said sources familiar with Christie’s thinking.

The renewed consideration about a White House run came after prodding this week from some Republicans he idolizes, including former First Lady Nancy Reagan, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, and former President George W. Bush, sources said.

[..]

Christie pals said the pol’s “mind-blowing” experience at the Reagan library in California Tuesday changed his thinking.

“We need you. Your country needs you to run for president,” one woman pleaded after Christie’s moving speech there.

Yet when the governor first arrived at the Reagan library, he was still telling his inner circle he was a definite “no” for a presidential run -- and planned to make that clear in his appearance.

Something changed that night, sources said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; bigtease; chrischristie; nomorerinos; norinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: Captain Kirk
feel good rhetoric

Quite the opposite.

81 posted on 09/29/2011 7:43:28 AM PDT by Huck (Oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Whoever that fellow is in the chair (ha) could not be elected in the age of television.

I like Christie, but I cringe when I see him at certain angles.

He looks like a before candidate on Biggest Loser.

Not holding it against him, but he can’t be president with that body.


82 posted on 09/29/2011 7:43:52 AM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/Perry or Palin/Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: altura

“Christie is too fat to be president”

Only cause he’d be goofed on by the media. Taft was no Twiggy!


83 posted on 09/29/2011 7:44:24 AM PDT by jimmyo57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Evidence?


84 posted on 09/29/2011 7:44:51 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: vicar7

Sorry but Christie is no McCain.Nor is he a Romney. McCain has been in charge of running his mouth and not a state for the last 20 years. He has been erratic and is all over the lot even to the point of pressing to have Dem to the point Lieberman on his national ticket. Christie has had the difficult job of running a Dem state saddled with a Dem legislature and steamrolling through fiscal spending cuts and fighting unions to the point that no one on that stage can match him.. He has established his fiscal conservative bona fides more than anyone on that stage.He is pro life and always has been.Been strongly opposed to Obamacare. Yup, one can probably find a few socially moderate positions he holds that one can disagree with but overall he is more conservative than most.


85 posted on 09/29/2011 7:51:40 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Read the speech. It's actually similar to the one point Trump was making a while back. I'm not a fan of Trump for president, but had one point that I really appreciated, which was that right now, we are NOT a great country.

We need a leader who doesn't coddle Americans. We need one who will tell it like it is. We have the potential to be great. We have the means. But right now we suck.

That was the main thrust of Christie's speech. The main theme was that exceptionalism must be earned--demonstrated. On this point he is correct, and El Rushbo is wrong:

A lot is being said in this election season about American exceptionalism. Implicit in such statements is that we are different and, yes, better, in the sense that our democracy, our economy and our people have delivered. But for American exceptionalism to truly deliver hope and a sterling example to the rest of the world, it must be demonstrated, not just asserted.

And again:

Without the authority that comes from that exceptionalism—earned American exceptionalism—we cannot do good for other countries, we cannot continue to be a beacon of hope for the world to aspire to for their future generations.

And then he closed on the same theme, that talk is cheap. We must actually accomplish our goals:

That is American exceptionalism. Not a punch line in a political speech, but a vision followed by a set of principled actions that made us the envy of the world. Not a re-election strategy, but an American revitalization strategy.

We will be that again, but not until we demand that our leaders stand tall by telling the truth, confronting our shortcomings, celebrating our successes and, once again leading the world because of what we have been able to actually accomplish.

Only when we do that will we finally ensure that our children and grandchildren will live in a second American century. We owe them, as well as ourselves and those who came before us, nothing less.

This wasn't a feel-good speech. It was a tough-love speech. He's saying we stink right now, and he's correct. He's saying, as Trump did, that we are not respected in the world right now. They laugh at us, and rightly so.

86 posted on 09/29/2011 7:55:03 AM PDT by Huck (Oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Noooooooo Waaaaaay!!!!


87 posted on 09/29/2011 8:02:55 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: altura
Whoever that fellow is in the chair (ha) could not be elected in the age of television.

William Howard Taft, 27th President of the United States, and later the tenth Chief Justice of the United States.

88 posted on 09/29/2011 8:26:26 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

I was joking but thanks for the info anyway.


89 posted on 09/29/2011 8:41:22 AM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/Perry or Palin/Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Would Christie surpass Taft for fattest president?

We need to check this out ... it’s important.

Christie admits to 300+ but what is the plus. How much did Taft weigh? Have to look that up.


90 posted on 09/29/2011 8:43:20 AM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/Perry or Palin/Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Almost anyone who respects the 2nd amendment, Christie damned sure doesn’t.


91 posted on 09/29/2011 8:43:21 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Still can’t name one. That’s my point.


92 posted on 09/29/2011 8:49:00 AM PDT by Huck (Oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: altura

At his heaviest Taft weighed about 340 pounds. He had to have a special bathtub built in the White House.

However, Taft was 6’2” a big guy. Christie looks about 5’9” or 5’10” and he weighs at least that much. He looks like a bowling ball.

Can you imagine people even considering a woman that fat?

Not when we’ve spent hours chortling over Hillary’s cankles and Michelle’s big butt. And those women are basically normal sized. They wouldn’t get a nod on the people of Wal-Mart site.


93 posted on 09/29/2011 8:50:50 AM PDT by altura ( Palin/Ryan---or Palin/Perry or Palin/Rubio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
"all the emphasis on compromise..."

Did you actually listen/ see the speech as it was broadcast from the Reagan Library?

I didn't think so. You must have only listened to Rush yesterday. Rush picked up on one word then made a whole show out of it.

94 posted on 09/29/2011 8:54:25 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sillsfan
Christie has stated on dozens of occasions that he is not running. The most recent was at the Reagan Library.

Exactly. He has been clear over and over again. He is not running. He is not running.

It's not Christie's fault that the media writes a story everytime his florist or paperboy claims he's still thinking about it.

Others have failed to "sht or get off the pot" but not Christie. He got off the pot back in June.

95 posted on 09/29/2011 8:56:15 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jla

“‘The big tease’ - How is it different than Palin?”

Christie has said ‘NO’ several times, Palin hasn’t.


96 posted on 09/29/2011 8:58:32 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I am not going to support ANYONE who supports New Jersey style gun laws. I feel the same way about Romney and his Massachusetts gun law crap.

I've made all the compromises I'm going to make on the issue.

They may say they wouldn't support similar laws on a national scale but the fact that they support them ANYWHERE is evidence of dysfunctional thought processes.

97 posted on 09/29/2011 8:59:28 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

It’s very interesting that you simply cannot name a candidate.


98 posted on 09/29/2011 9:07:56 AM PDT by Huck (Oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Every candidate but Romney has a better track record on RKBA than Christie.


99 posted on 09/29/2011 9:14:07 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

You’ve proven my point. Thanks.


100 posted on 09/29/2011 9:22:12 AM PDT by Huck (Oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson