Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 6ppc
It's uncontrolled.

I don't know that that's relevant. They have the ability to track the orbit and plot the re-entry vector of any object they can get a fix on.

It seems highly unlikely to me that NASA and NORAD don't have at least an approximate idea of where this thing will come down.

30 posted on 09/22/2011 9:03:47 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

The problem is getting a handle on atmospheric density at the orbital altitude. Since they can’t do a controlled de-orbit burn the satellite is at the mercy of whatever traces of atmosphere exist at it’s current altitude. Without a way to precisely measure that at all points in the orbit, there is no way to precisely determine how much it is slowing it down until after the fact.

They can make estimates based on tracking (which is exactly what they are doing), but cannot tell exactly what part of the orbit, or even exactly which orbit it will give up the ghost and re-enter.


47 posted on 09/22/2011 10:21:00 AM PDT by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson