Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New heory Explains How Twin Towers Collapsed: Was Mixture Of Sprinkler Systems And Molten Aluminum
Eurasia Review ^ | September 22, 2011 | Eurasia Review

Posted on 09/21/2011 10:09:40 PM PDT by Ghost of Jesus Gil

Simensen claims that it is overwhelmingly likely that the two aircraft were trapped inside an insulating layer of building debris within the skyscrapers. This leads him to believe that it was the aircraft hulls rather than the buildings themselves that absorbed most of the heat from the burning aircraft fuel.

The SINTEF scientist believes that the heat melted the aluminium of the aircraft hulls, and the core of his theory is that molten aluminium then found its way downwards within the buildings through staircases and gaps in the floor – and that the flowing aluminium underwent a chemical reaction with water from the sprinklers in the floors below.

“Both scientific experiments and 250 reported disasters suffered by the aluminium industry have shown that the combination of molten aluminium and water releases enormous explosions,” said Simensen.

(Excerpt) Read more at eurasiareview.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: conspiracytheories; terrorism; wtc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2011 10:09:48 PM PDT by Ghost of Jesus Gil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Jesus Gil

Does it really matter at this point? Only the wackos believe “we” did it, and we know the buildings fell.

The math is simple:

Skyscraper + flying plane full of fuel = bad.


2 posted on 09/21/2011 10:16:31 PM PDT by TheZMan (Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Jesus Gil

Don’t need a new theory!


3 posted on 09/21/2011 10:17:55 PM PDT by Balata (It's 'WE THE PEOPLE' Obama, not 'WE THE SHEEPLE'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Jesus Gil

Aluminum isn’t used in rocket fuel for no reason.


4 posted on 09/21/2011 10:25:54 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balata
Didn't the Brits loose a frigate when the aluminum superstructure was struck by an Exocet missile during the Falklands war.....?
5 posted on 09/21/2011 10:26:54 PM PDT by spokeshave (Obama's ratings are so low...Kenyans accuse him of being born in the USA,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Yes powdered aluminum is used in solid propellant rockets it is finely divided & thoroughly mixed with a solid oxidizer & the two components are ignited if the mixture is wrong you get a fizzle .


6 posted on 09/21/2011 10:29:58 PM PDT by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Yes the ship caught fire & burned into a hulk due to the Brits not being up to speed on damage control / fire fighting.


7 posted on 09/21/2011 10:31:36 PM PDT by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Balata

I just found it interesting as this seems to really be a good article to shut up all the conspiracy types


8 posted on 09/21/2011 10:32:16 PM PDT by Ghost of Jesus Gil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

That may be true, but once the the insulation burned off the steel structures of the World Trade centers the steel melted and the buildings collapsed.


9 posted on 09/21/2011 10:34:19 PM PDT by Balata (It's 'WE THE PEOPLE' Obama, not 'WE THE SHEEPLE'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Jesus Gil

lol! I don’t know how you shut up all the conspiracy types. They seem to find their way around all logic.


10 posted on 09/21/2011 10:37:02 PM PDT by Balata (It's 'WE THE PEOPLE' Obama, not 'WE THE SHEEPLE'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Jesus Gil

This is not a new concept:

“Aluminum and the World Trade Center Disaster”

http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf

F. R. Greening Ph.D.
Original Version (01.06): Jan 2006
This version (03.06): April 2006


11 posted on 09/21/2011 10:41:03 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Jesus Gil

This is incredibly stupid!
1. Any evidence of molten aluminum that “flowed” through the buildings? No
2. Chemical change between aluminum and water??? Nothing dramatic - aluminum oxide maybe - harmless
3. Molten metal + water = rapid steam generation. When confined or when inside molten metal, the steam causes “explosions” - No mystery - happens with molten lead, zinc, steel etc.
Theories this lame can only come from dillusional non-scientists.


12 posted on 09/21/2011 10:41:45 PM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Ping for later


13 posted on 09/21/2011 10:41:57 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
Didn't the Brits loose a frigate when the aluminum superstructure was struck by an Exocet missile during the Falklands war.....?

HMS Sheffield.

14 posted on 09/21/2011 10:43:04 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan
Does it really matter at this point? Only the wackos believe “we” did it, and we know the buildings fell. The math is simple: Skyscraper + flying plane full of fuel = bad.

Only the real wackos want to silence questions.

The math is simple: Shill + brain full of techniques = bad.

15 posted on 09/21/2011 10:45:16 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Jesus Gil
I have THE theory on why and how the towers fell...50 years of liberalism, multicultural rot, political correctness and the so called Commander in Chief X.42 getting Lewinskys in the oval office and whoring after a Nobel prize, instead of honoring his oath to the Constitution and protecting the nation.


Now let some pointy headed intellectuals dissect that THEORY!!

16 posted on 09/21/2011 10:48:15 PM PDT by Nat Turner (I can see NOVEMBER 2012 from my house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic
This is incredibly stupid!
1. Any evidence of molten aluminum that “flowed” through the buildings? No
2. Chemical change between aluminum and water??? Nothing dramatic - aluminum oxide maybe - harmless
3. Molten metal + water = rapid steam generation. When confined or when inside molten metal, the steam causes “explosions” - No mystery - happens with molten lead, zinc, steel etc.
Theories this lame can only come from dillusional non-scientists.

From the article:

Additionally, Simensen added that “The aluminium industry has reported more than 250 aluminium-water explosions since 1980. Alcoa Aluminium carried out an experiment under controlled conditions, in which 20 kilos of aluminium smelt were allowed to react with 20 kilos of water, to which some rust was added. The explosion destroyed the entire laboratory and left a crater 30 metres in diameter.”

So, I guess who is delusional depends on whether Alcoa really carried out such an experiment with the result described.

17 posted on 09/21/2011 11:00:00 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Balata

You can’t shut them up. I’ve found that, at this point, any reasonable person who might have entertained these beliefs has gone out, done a little research, and figured out they were wrong, or been convinced that they were wrong by somebody they mouthed off about it to. Anyone that still believes it is a conspiracy will never be reasoned out of that belief because they are emotionally attached to it.


18 posted on 09/21/2011 11:00:41 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Aluminum superstructures where also used on the old DDGs and DLGs by the Navy. The fire on the Belknap was the reason the Navy went to steel superstructures for later ships.
19 posted on 09/21/2011 11:03:54 PM PDT by meatloaf (It's time to push back against out of control government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic
This is incredibly stupid!

Agreed! You only need to look even conceptually at the mass and heat capacity of the aircraft hull embedded in each building vs the mass and heat capacity of the buildings themselves and the venting paths available, and you know that this is indeed a crackpot theory promoted by a crackpot non-scientist trying to generate some personal publicity.

20 posted on 09/21/2011 11:04:46 PM PDT by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson