Posted on 09/19/2011 2:19:39 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Almost two weeks ago, I noted that the New York Times seemed shocked, shocked that Sarah Palin had suddenly turned into an anti-establishment conservative populist in a Labor Day weekend speech in Iowa. The Gray Lady wasnt the only media outlet who missed, well, almost all of Palins political career. Salons Justin Elliott was so stunned by the speech that he turned to Ralph Nader to analyze the sudden new direction taken by Palin. Nader pronounced himself impressed:
We decided to call the longtime left crusader about a speech Palin gave in Iowa earlier this month, one which seemed to mark the transformation of Palin from a standard-issue movement conservative to something more independent and more reformist. And Nader told us he liked what he heard.
I think shes a lot smarter than most people credit her, says Nader. Judging by her comments, she is squarely in the camp of conservative populism, opposed to corporatism and its corporate state.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
>> “Whats the problem?” <<
.
Sudetenland is one of the main anti-Palin agitators here.
3rd Party running mates??
>> “Well, there’s a certain Texas A&M grad who may give you your wish” <<
.
We’d prefer someone that didn’t have to buy grades to get their diploma.
palin more intelligent than obama?
of course.
First the NYT and now Ralph Nader. I’m beginning to think they are trying to undermine her with kindness. :)
RUN, SARAH....R U N! That’ll set their hair on fire!
Of course! I should have read to whom I was replying. /rolleyes It has already been well established that you are not a rational poster in any way shape or form.
As I stated, the button is there on your page.
Your reply proves my point rather well though; read it.
Thanks for the rational reply, Springfield. Somehow it seems to be a rarity around here.
You have just revealed yourself to be a liar. You made an allegation and now you are unable to back it up with facts.
I'll vouch for him. :)
Sarah Palin didn't.
Careful with the CatError call SR, I spent a couple pages with a poster not too long ago telling me black was white on that subject. If he sees it used contrary to his interp, get ready for a war ;)
BTW, I agree with your use. Classic CatError.
I invite one and all to click on this link and read your nasty sarcastic comments on every Palin thread you darken:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:sudetenland/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
deletable=depletable.
So Springfield showed me. Glad to know it.
BINGO!
BTW, how does a real free marketer justify a windfall profits tax on oil companies in Alaska?
If you don’t support Palin thats your perogative,but could you please save on the ignorant or stupid comments,PS you dont come across as to bright if your to lazy or ignorant to reasearch the issue which you wish to comment on.
BTW, how does a real free marketer justify a windfall profits tax on oil companies in Alaska?
If you don’t support Palin thats your perogative,but could you please save on the ignorant or stupid comments,PS you dont come across as to bright if your to lazy or ignorant to reasearch the issue which you wish to comment on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.