[reasonisfaith]

Government bureaucrats should not be allowed to make medical decisions.

There is no valid argument against this.

[Eagle Eye]

If the vaccine is optional then the patient pays.

If it is on the mandated list then insurance pays.

We can debate the merits of whether or not government should regulate their business, but the have and they do and they will.

So...if you believed that there were people that could use a cancer preventing medication and it was in your power to make it available to them at no cost, would you?

Remember, no one was forced into the vaccine, there was ALWAYS an opt out.

So...would you or not?

[freedumb2003]

>>There is no valid argument against this.<<

Children should not be vaccinated against Measles, Rubella, Mumps, Chicken Pox, TB and, not that long ago, Polio? There is no public policy argument, especially since many of these are very contagious?

[Mr Ramsbotham]

There is no valid argument against this.

I don't know. What about the argument used by the proponents of vaccination, that an individual's failure to be vaccinated exposes others to the possibility of acquiring a disease that could easily be prevented?

[hobbes1]

Government bureaucrats should not be allowed to make medical decisions.
There is no valid argument against this.

So, reason...Tell us all, we'll wait. What gets eliminated from the MANDATORY vaccination schedules, and why?

Oh, and maybe...just maybe, you can tell us about your lengthy protestations against the schedules, prior to 2011.

I thought one of the elements of Reason, was understanding what you were talking about. Doesn't that make your...faith..suspect?

There is no valid argument against the observation, given the evidence at hand.