“That’s interesting because Palin endorsed Perry after the Gardasil kerfuffle.”
Lesser of two weavils, without a doubt!
Sarah, in 2010, was supporting TEA Party candidates, and sure winners, who would be a solid support base for her Administration, especially when she went after the business as usual crowd, crooks, and carreerists that infest DC.
Perry’s accepted her support saying he wasn’t a 2012 presidential candidate. Sorry gal, but Perry has shown his stripes with his going back on his word, and has additionally exposed himself as a crony capitalist.
Sarah dislikes both attributes in a politician. All bets are off vis a vis Perry.
So it’s okay for Sarah Palin to endorse a candidate who practices crony capitalism which she professes to hate, because he is the lesser of two evils, but it’s not okay for voters to support him?
Got it.
And how do you explain her endorsement of McCain over the much more conservative Hayworth? They had already lost the election and she wasn’t his VP candidate any more so what did she owe him? Nothing.
Sarah compromises her principles when it’s convenient just like any other politician. I’m supporting the only non-politician in the bunch. If you were intellectually honest, you’d support him too.