So it’s okay for Sarah Palin to endorse a candidate who practices crony capitalism which she professes to hate, because he is the lesser of two evils, but it’s not okay for voters to support him?
Got it.
And how do you explain her endorsement of McCain over the much more conservative Hayworth? They had already lost the election and she wasn’t his VP candidate any more so what did she owe him? Nothing.
Sarah compromises her principles when it’s convenient just like any other politician. I’m supporting the only non-politician in the bunch. If you were intellectually honest, you’d support him too.
1) There’s a huge difference between being governor of Texas and POTUS.
2) You don’t go out on a limb for a guy like J.D. Hayworth, who has more baggage than a cross-country flight on Christmas Eve.
Herman Cain is indeed my second choice, but Sarah has a record of confronting this kind of thing head-on from the top of the government. That’s what I want running the country.