Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Mexico State Police Officer Fired After Caught Having Sex on Car
foxnews.com ^ | Sept 3 2011 | Associated Press

Posted on 09/03/2011 3:57:29 PM PDT by NoLibZone

A New Mexico state police officer has been fired after security cameras caught him having sex with a woman on the hood of a car.

Officer Bert Lopez's dismissal from the New Mexico state police was confirmed by The Santa Fe New Mexican on Saturday. The newspaper said Lopez has 30 days to appeal the firing.

The surveillance photos were taken from a motion-triggered security camera positioned at the front gate of the county-owned La Bajada Ranch south of Santa Fe. The encounter was at the remote Canyon Ranch.

Two photos showing a uniformed officer having sex on the hood were forwarded to Santa Fe Sheriff Robert Garcia, who identified the officer as being with New Mexico State Police. He forwarded the images to State Police Chief Robert Shilling.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: checkingfrontshocks; communityorgasmiser; frontendalignment; frontendwork; frontwheeldrive; hondatvadmaterial; hotwheels; justbouncetesting; leounions; louveredhood; shesetmeup; union4sure; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck
Do you think an ordinary citizen would have been given a pass?

What about a charge of indecent exposure?

21 posted on 09/03/2011 4:20:56 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

victim= taxpayers who paid him and trusted him with that job and anyone who watched that video. ick. Mental anguish should be millions.


22 posted on 09/03/2011 4:22:02 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

What he is thinking now...

“ONE MILLION ACRES of New Mexico desert and I had to stop under the one acre with a camera!”


23 posted on 09/03/2011 4:22:53 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS & PAINTINGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Good. Stupid bastard has no business being a cop. Even our insipid KKOB with “Terry Q” was all giggles over this.


24 posted on 09/03/2011 4:22:53 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

He has forever given new meaning to the term: Hoodie


25 posted on 09/03/2011 4:25:07 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (The whole truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Bert Bert Bert

You supposed to have sex IN da hood, not ON da hood


26 posted on 09/03/2011 4:25:10 PM PDT by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

oy!


27 posted on 09/03/2011 4:27:07 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

The police chief said there were no charges because “there was no victim”, since nobody (except the slut) was there to see the indecent exposure.

The rationale used there would mean that a participant in a crime can’t be a victim of the crime. So how could they ever arrest somebody for drug use? Not using a seat belt? Speeding when you’re the only person on the road? Entering the country illegally if nobody sees you do it? Forging a birth certificate? Who are the “victims” of those crimes?

The excuses made reveal a mindset that deserves further scrutiny.

This cop was connected to the democratic polical establishment. I posted a link to a site that noted some of the connections earlier; I could fetch it again.


28 posted on 09/03/2011 4:27:21 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Not according to the chief of police. Who needs to have his head examined, IMHO.


29 posted on 09/03/2011 4:28:48 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

I was commenting on the duration of an O... not the act. (I guess I should have clarified...)


30 posted on 09/03/2011 4:29:17 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Humm, that’s true. Indecent exposure (both him and the woman) would be virtually impossible to avoid if doing “it” atop an automobile. Though sometimes indecent exposure laws go too far, such as when a guy steps behind a bush on public property to pee, clearly hidden from view.


31 posted on 09/03/2011 4:31:16 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Old cop saying:

Your badge’ll get you pu$$y; pu$$y’ll get your badge.


32 posted on 09/03/2011 4:31:39 PM PDT by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Here’s what I posted earlier:

Apparently this guy is well-connected with the NM Democratic Party. According to http://joemonahansnewmexico.blogspot.com/ :

“The ties of La Politica go deep indeed and they are now surfacing in the notorious case of State Police Officer Bert Lopez. He’s been identified by the press as the officer who had his way with a lady friend on the hood of her Honda while he was in full uniform . The sexcapade near Santa Fe was captured on security video and Lopez, Jr. awaits disciplinary action. Now to the officer’s ties to La Politica from one of our Alligators:

Lopez is the grandson of Alex Armijo, a former Santa Fe politico and former Dem state land commissioner. And his political ties don’t stop there. His mother, Raquel Lopez, is a close friend of Lenore Naranjo, the Chief Clerk of the State Senate and serves as a Senate clerk...Lenore Naranjo is pushing Bert Lopez Jr.’s nephew, Vince Torres, for Deputy Chief Clerk of the Senate. If this comes to pass, Vince Torres would be the first male to have such a post... “


33 posted on 09/03/2011 4:31:42 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Motion triggered camera, lol. You know your gettin’ bizzle when you trigger the motion triggered camera.


34 posted on 09/03/2011 4:32:50 PM PDT by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“... he was trying to charm the lady into revealing some secrets to crack a murder case...”

You are too funny. It is uh.. a new... investigative tool. Yeah, that’s it. LOL!


35 posted on 09/03/2011 4:34:39 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

What absolute, utter nonsense.


36 posted on 09/03/2011 4:36:38 PM PDT by arderkrag (Georgia is God's Country. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I’m surprised that PETA isn’t after him for ruining the psyche of the Chihuahua that watched the incident..


37 posted on 09/03/2011 4:47:25 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Not long ago, that would have been considered a resumé enhancer around here. A little more discretion would have helped but....
Just sayin’.


38 posted on 09/03/2011 4:49:23 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (I'm sticking with Herman. No more second terms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
As a longtime advocate of taking victimless crimes off the books, I'd like to civilly respond to your examples, if you don't mind.

So how could they ever arrest somebody for drug use? Not using a seat belt? Speeding when you’re the only person on the road?

None of these actually directly interefere with the rights of another. Indirect interference situations - "victimless crimes", in leyman's terms - shouldn't result in criminal litigation.

Entering the country illegally if nobody sees you do it?

Entering the country requires crossing Federal, State, and Private property lines. Direct interference of property holder's exclusive rights. Criminal charge? Trespassing, several different deviations. Deportation if federal or state borders involved.

Forging a birth certificate?

Forging a birth certificate is essentially fraud, thus directly interfering with those financially and legally affected by the addition of another number in the census pool. Direct interference. In context of you-know-who's Birth Certificate, compounded interference because his decisions directly affect the rights of every single citizen. Criminal charge? Fraud, possible identity fabrication in the first case. The second? High treason.
39 posted on 09/03/2011 4:49:46 PM PDT by arderkrag (Georgia is God's Country. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Typical anti-police hatred.

Doesn’t anyone understand how dangerous it is to be a police officer?

Each and every interaction with the civilian population can endanger their lives!

Office Lopez had to have sex with that woman on the hood of a car! For all he knew his fate that day may have been to be gunned down by a home-grown terrorist!

I’m sure he did it for the chidren!


40 posted on 09/03/2011 4:54:10 PM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (All the lands of the Mideast should return to their AD 609 borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson