Posted on 09/03/2011 8:43:33 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
Citing a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Obama administration is suing a trucking company for taking the keys away from an Arkansas driver and eventually firing him after he admitted he was battling alcohol abuse.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit this week arguing that Old Dominion Freight Line discriminated against Charles Grams by stripping him of his position and offering him a demotion even if he completed a substance abuse counseling program.
Instead, the EEOC argued, the North Carolina-based company, which has a service center in Arkansas, should have complied with the law, known as the ADA, while ensuring safety.
The ADA mandates that persons with disabilities have an equal opportunity to achieve in the workplace, said Katharine Kores, director of the EEOCs Memphis District Office, which covers Arkansas. While the EEOC agrees that an employers concern regarding safety on our highways is a legitimate issue, an employer can both ensure safety and comply with the ADA.
The EEOC says alcoholism is a recognized disability under the ADA and that the company violated the law with its policy that bans any driver who admits alcohol abuse from driving again.
The EEOC wants the company to reinstate Grams and another affected driver to their previous positions and provide them with back pay, compensatory and punitive damages and compensation for lost benefits. The EEOC is also seeking to block the companys alcohol-related policy.
The company's policy bans any driver who self-reports alcohol abuse from driving again. Reassignment to a non-driving position is contingent upon the driver enrolling in a treatment program.
Joel McCarty, general counsel to Old Dominion, wouldnt comment on the details of the pending litigation. But he told FoxNews.com, We intend to vigorously defend our position. snip Our concern is safety, he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
“Drive Drunk! America Needs More Drunk Truck Drivers!”
There is “crazy” and there is “stupid crazy”. This falls under the “stupid crazy” category. Of course, the trucking company isn’t going to let a DRUNK person drive one of its trucks. Can you imagine the lawsuit after a family is killed? No different than the same trucking company not hiring a BLIND driver. The trucking company made a wise decision and the government (once again) is stupid crazy.
These are the same Mother truckers who would have sued Old Dominion for millions, had thier drunken driver run over one of them.
It’s hard to win when you hve all of these Goodie Two Shoes organizations around sue’ing here and sue’ing there.
This guy shouldn’t have a CDL permit
Dominion should hire him back and call the cops and tell them he is driving drunk. The legal drinking limit in Maryland for a CDL permit is .04. Yes that’s right folks .04.
EEOC needs to be dismantled. They have jumped the shark.
The whole government has jumped the shark. About 90% of what the government does should not be done at all.
We attend monthly MADD meetings where we meet with other victims and console each other.
“About 90% of what the government does should not be done at all.”
Ain’t that the truth.
We do have a blueprint for fixing it, well two really.
The Declaration and the Constitution. Time to get back to basics and start cleaning house.
Prayers for you and your family, Young Werther. What you went through must have been just horrible and tragic. I am sure your loss is extreme and I am very happy that you found some bit of comfort with MADD and other victims. Prayers!
If he’d killed someone with that truck, the company would have been sued then, too. They just can’t win.
I’m telling you clearly, the American government workers hate Americans.
And the lawyers win either way.
Not all Americans. Just the ones that work for themselves. Businesses and anyone else that works hard. Just look at what’s going on with Gibson.
Every day a new battle in the democrat party war on American business.
Where is MADD by the way?
It is not clear if the guy was driving drunk, or admitted he had a drinking problem. Technically they could check him out when he arrives at work and then provide keys if he were sober. He might just be a weekend drunk. More information needed.
Where I work, if one of the CDL drivers get busted DUI, he would be pretty much SOL.
They may find a place for him, but at a reduced pay rate because he is no longer a driver.
This story makes me sick. Would they keep a Pilot who has a drinking problem if he flew Airforce One...I doubt it.
ALCOHOLISM IS A BEHAVIOR, NOT A FREAKIN’ DISEASE!
IF YOU CAN”T HANDLE THE RESULTS, DON’T USE THE SUBSTANCE!
(Yes, I was screaming. I feel better now!)
So he could then pick up booze at one of his stops?? The risk is too great.
So for most folks, one beer with lunch, no problem. Two beers with lunch or one and a few sips of the second on an empty stomach, problem. Sounds reasonable to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.