What DUMBASSES!
Even if GW was a real threat, this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what should be done, as the primary “greenhouse gas” in our atmosphere is WATER VAPOR!
Good catch! This could actually be a useful technology - in ten years time when we’re all freezing.
LOL! They don’t even understand the climate well enough to even understand how to affect it or where the planet’s temp should be set at in the first place.
[ What DUMBASSES!
Even if GW was a real threat, this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what should be done, as the primary “greenhouse gas” in our atmosphere is WATER VAPOR! ]
Depending on the state of water in the air ( transparent vapour vs. opaque clouds ) it can be a greenhouse gas (vapour) or a reflector of suns rays back into space (clouds).
Anyways CO2 is not what is causing climate “change”, I think it is RR, that stands for “Roads and Rooftops”. The change of the local climates or “micro-climates” caused by the change of reflectivity of roofs and roads in urbanized areas create a “micro-climate” which has a far greater effect on weather systems.
Ever notice how in the winter the snow on the grass in urban areas melts a lot quicker than the snow in the nearby rural areas? This is the micro climate. Also funny is how a lot of “temprature stations” that were built 50+ years ago outside cities are now surrounded by roads, and houses? No wonder those temprature sensors have seen increases in the local tempratures.... The city expanded around them and brought the micro-climate with them.
To paraphrase James Carvile:
It is not the CO2, it is the Roads and Rooftops Stuipid!
Of course the urban city loving eco-tards don’t wanna admit that the cities they love to live in are a direct cause of their skewed data. They think that cities will be fine if everyone trades their SUV in for a bike, the roads and rooftops will still be there even if they are solar panels and bike trails.
CO2 is not as big of an issue we think it is.