That is the crux of the problem, the public has accepted Big Murder's definition of personhood.
I remember reading abortionists’ testimony to Congress a few years ago, in which they argued that a woman coming in for an abortion has a right to a dead fetus (I think the testimony involved taking measures to save fetuses who didn’t die inside their mothers during the abortion process).
A right to a dead fetus apparently does not encompass the right to know that a fetus dies during an abortion.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
“The woman alleged that the clinic staff had a duty to tell her that she was terminating the life of a human being as a matter of biological fact. “
Where has this nitwit been since Roe v Wade? I think the suit was frivilous.
You walk into an abortion factory, have an abortion, and then sue because they did what you paid them to do? Forgive me but I have very little sympathy for that.
Most murderers regret their killing, but few sue their accomplices.
Is this the same woman that bought the wood IPod from two guys in the parking lot at McDonalds?
I can understand the woman’s regret for murdering her baby.
But she was pregnant and didn’t realize that the child growing inside of her was a human being?
What did she think it would eventually be born as if she didn’t abort? A frog? A platypus? Perhaps a Salamander?
Pro-Life PING
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.