Oh, that’s right, blame the WSJ. This group is not ready for prime time. You don’t “put on hold” an event that you committed to a long time ago because another person has been invited. You don’t move to another venue in the same town. This is a terrible, terrible move on SP’s and/or her advisors’ part.
A week or two ago, if anyone on this site so much as suggested that she was not going to announce her candidacy at that event in Indianola, IA on 9/3, they were given full court abuse. PalinFRistas and others made plans to be there, some traveling 1000 miles, for what was imagined as an historic event, vowing to crawl on broken glass (or hot coals), etc. to see tht she was elected.
And now, this? Christine O’Donnell gets invited, so the SP appearance is “put on hold?” I am having a hard time believing SP could be that petty. But it’s not a good reflection on anyone who wants to be POTUS, that’s for sure.
“A week or two ago, if anyone on this site so much as suggested that she was not going to announce her candidacy at that event in Indianola, IA on 9/3, they were given full court abuse.”
Wrong. I said repeatedly that she would not announce there and not a single person flamed me for it.
WHO put the story out with NO confirmtion from Sarah Palin? WSJ did. They published a RUMOR as fact. What would YOU call it?