Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EDINVA

WHO put the story out with NO confirmtion from Sarah Palin? WSJ did. They published a RUMOR as fact. What would YOU call it?


422 posted on 08/31/2011 12:15:43 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Id imperfectum manet dum confectum erit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]


To: MestaMachine

@shushwalshe Shushannah Walshe
Tea Party of Amer confirms Palin will speak but also tells a strange tale of the back + forth w COD + Peter Singleton speaking for the gov
16 minutes ago


429 posted on 08/31/2011 12:32:38 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine

Reporters work with ‘sources.’ Reporters are supposed to ‘double source’ for accuracy. It could reflect misunderstanding or disorganization within the SP inner circle. Obviously, sources close to SP either gave that information which appears to be a “difference” between ‘canceled’ and ‘put on hold.’

IS there a substantive difference, 3 days before a long scheduled event, for a keynote speaker to ‘cancel’ or ‘put on hold?’ When hundreds or thousands were going to the event, often at great personal expense, to see the keynote speaker?

If I’d booked a flight, or reserved a hotel room, my money’s gone. Or I don’t know whether to go or not.

If there were problems with the tea party event, as there inevitably are at large events, the keynote speaker would let them get straightened out by the organizers. The keynote speaker does not put out word that s/he is putting the speech ‘on hold.’


498 posted on 08/31/2011 4:26:47 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson