Posted on 08/30/2011 3:42:19 PM PDT by smoothsailing
by Ben Smith & Maggie Haberman
August 30, 2011
In his two weeks as a presidential candidate, Rick Perry has done something that neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney could do: wake up the left.
Perry panic has spread from the conference rooms of Washington, D.C., to the coffee shops of Brooklyn, with the realization that the conservative Texan could conceivably become the 45th president of the United States, a wave of alarm centering around Perry’s drawling, small-town affect and stands on core cultural issues such as women’s rights, gun control, the death penalty and the separation of church and state.
The epidemic of lefty angst isn’t just a matter of specific Perry policies though; it goes to the heart of the liberal worldview. His smashing debut on the presidential stage suggests that the victory of an urban liberal Democrat, Barack Obama, wasn’t a step toward a more progressive nation, but just a leftward swing of an increasingly wild pendulum, now poised to rocket to the right.
“His entry in the race is a signal and a wake-up call,” the Rev. Al Sharpton told POLITICO.
Perry, Sharpton said, “is looking to go to the O.K. Corral and start shooting…. Rather than the left get caught sleeping, we better load up, because he is bringing it.”
For Democrats, the pre-Perry GOP primary process was hardly for the faint of heart, as the other candidates have jockeyed to show who dislikes Obama the most. But even as the primary is fought on conservative turf, liberal leaders say they and their constituents see Perry as far worse than your average, hated Republican, and indeed as bad – if not worse – than his hated predecessor in Austin, George W. Bush. And progressives who might have had a hard time getting worked up about Mitt Romney find themselves struggling for superlatives with which to express their fear of a President Perry.
“His work as governor is unparalleled in its frontal assault on women,” said Siobhan Bennett, the president of the Women’s Campaign Forum, citing statistics on women living in poverty and without health care in Texas, and Perry’s active opposition to abortion. “He has gone farther out on a limb legislatively in his capacity as governor and has been expressly anti-woman in the legislation he has done.”
“He is beyond what we expect from conservative Republicans on the gun issue,” said Dennis Henigan, the acting president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, who cited Perry’s support for gun rights on college campuses and said it was a sharp contrast with Romney’s “moderate” record. Perry’s rise, he said, had already become “a strong mobilizing force” for gun control activists, whose agenda has been largely ignored by the Obama administration.
“People are perceiving a very real threat that he could be the Republican nominee,” said Henigan, calling the prospect “quite frightening.”
Barry Lynn, whose Americans United for the Separation of Church and State is on the front lines of keeping religion out of public life, also labeled Perry an extreme figure.
“He doesn’t just go to religious right gatherings – he creates religious right gatherings and that’s a big difference,” he said, citing The Response, an 30,000-person event Perry led in Houston in early August.
Lynn said last week’s polls showing Perry in the lead among Republicans had startled his group’s supporters.
“Any time there’s a very viable candidate who has taken on the mantle of a crusader for Christ and ignorer of the Constitution, that makes very many people who care about the real Constitution very nervous,” he said.
Backers of another longstanding liberal cause, campaign finance reform, see a similar threat from Perry, given his career tapping the bottomless Texas wells of oil money and his current status as beneficiary of not one but several new Super PACs.
“It looks like Rick Perry’s campaign and its supporters are taking secret corporate spending to a new level,” said New York City Public Advocate Bill DeBlasio, who has campaigned against corporate involvement in politics. “His actions personify the corporate sponsored campaigns that many of us feared Citizens United would create.”
The death penalty, another longstanding liberal target, has figured prominently in Perry’s career: He has presided over more executions than any other governor, commuting just one sentence in his three terms years and vetoing a bill that would have banned the execution of the mentally handicapped, something the Supreme Court later outlawed.
Richard Dieter, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said Perry’s conduct of the death penalty was in fact “typical” for a conservative Southern governor, and that the high numbers largely reflected the size of his state and the length of his tenure; the rate of executions has actually declined since the Bush years.
But for death penalty foes, a symbol of Perry’s shortcomings on the issue is his rebuff in 2004 of the Innocence Project’s petitions on behalf of Cameron Todd Willingham, a man convicted of murdering his family on the basis of scientific evidence arson experts described as unreliable. In 2009, Perry abruptly replaced officials who were investigating the case.
“That’s a worrisome series of events about what people are most concerned about when they think about the death penalty – and that is innocence,” said Dieter.
Perry is certainly to Romney’s right on many of these policy issues. Romney, for instance, pushed legislation in Massachusetts that would have reinstated a death penalty only in very limited, carefully vetted circumstances. But Perry isn’t necessarily far outside the Republican mainstream in, for instance, his implacable opposition to taxes and abortion, or his support for religion in public life. His stated support for states rights might, in theory, make him less likely to intervene on social issues than some of his GOP rivals.
But Perry’s combination of policy, Southern style and an easy, unstudied adherence to contemporary religious and political conservative doctrine has put him beyond the reach even of some Democrats who sometimes cross the aisle. Former New York Mayor Ed Koch, who endorsed George W. Bush in 2004 and has criticized Obama’s foreign policy, cited Perry’s recent stated skepticism about the theory of evolution.
“I can’t support anyone who doesn’t believe in evolution – that to me is too much,” said Koch.
And while conservatives enjoy Perry’s ability to enrage their liberal foes, some Democratic strategists have also welcomed his emergence.
“Whether he’s the nominee or not, he absolutely helps fire up our base,” said Jennifer Palmieri, the vice president for communications at the liberal Center for American Progress. “To the degree to which progressives are disaffected and unenthusiastic – this is their ‘holy sh**’ moment.”
Clinton strategist James Carville, however, said Perry remains his second choice.
“Actually we’d all prefer Michele Bachmann,” he said.
Emily Schultheis contributed.
© 2011 POLITICO LLC
Perry has incorporated Reagan’s economic policies in his decision making.
The TTC and the Gardisil issues are glaring...until you actually research what happened.
With the Gardisil situation...he openly admitted he was wrong. Well I don’t know about you but that is a hell of alot better than what we deal with right now and that is a completely tone deaf administration that insists on forcing things down our throats.
Perry is not perfect but HE LISTENS.
We ARE NOT electing a king for crying out loud. We will be electing the President who will (in spite of the current wanna be tin-horn dictators currently occupying the WH) LISTEN.
We must elect a congress-our representatives that will be working on our behalf and we must have a President that will LISTEN.
Perry has shown that he will.
Without question.
Slanderous and not very bright, are you, bfree ? If there is a RINO to be shilled for, you’ll be there. If there’s a treacherous trojan horse phony to be apologized for, you’ll be there. But when there’s a Conservative, you’re somewhere else. Why don’t you tell us your warm and fuzzy feelings about Mark Kirk and Ah-nold ? Socialists just seem to warm your heart, as long as they’re “Republicans”, of course.
They’re looking for only those who agree with them on every issue and have never made a mistake or revised their opinions.
Sometimes they intentionally toss the baby out with the bathwater.
It isn’t worth even discussing it with some of them as their mind is made up and nothing will dissuade them.
>> Really?
Yeah, really. I recall fieldmarshaldj from *last* election cycle. Strongly opinionated (not that there’ anything wrong with that!) and definitely not shy & retiring.
But he is nobody’s shill, and he certainly isn’t on anyone’s payroll. I don’t agree with him on everything, and I don’t agree with him on Rick Perry, but I respect his opinion, and I agree with him on a lot of things.
FRegards
What exactly are you looking for field?
Well I know I have no questions! Great tag line! lol
It appears you are exactly spot on.
*snicker* :)
Agreed.
You really ought to come out of your shell and say what you really think. Go ahead, give it a try sometime! :-)
Glad you got yourself convinced.
Perhaps you are correct in saying that Perry gets a feel for what the people want then stands for that.
I can handle that since I don’t vote for leaders but people to represent me in the government, to do what I want done, not to do what he pleases regardless of what I and others like me want.
So...a pro-life, pro gun, pro business veteran who wants a strong national defense and has successful executive experience in one of the world’s largest economies doesn’t interest you?
Oh well.
Good question, and good list. Most likely, the answer boils down to, he’s not _____________, where one can put the name of some other favored candidate, or possible candidate.
Palin. If she’s unavailable, let’s draft Gov. Paul LePage of Maine. No more wishy-washy phonies whose rhetoric never quite matches their record. We need leaders, not politicians. Too many folks around here would’ve settled for George H.W. Bush in 1980 over Reagan (or John Anderson, for that matter) to take on Carter. We can’t afford to elect someone who isn’t going to aggressively support a Conservative agenda. We’ve reached the tipping point in this country that it has become a matter of life or death. Another decade of Communist Democrat or Establishment RINO Presidents and Congresses, and we will finally crumble under the weight of spending and the obscene immorality of the unconstitutional size and scope of our government.
I’ll try. :-P
Another childlike response from you. It is to be expect everyone. Slanderous? On a message board? You really are a clown. Name who you supported in the Illinois senate election. go ahead, everyone would like to hear. If after the primary you didn’t think Kirk, with all his flaws, was better than having Alexi who would vote 100% with obami, then you are nuts.
And there's your problem. Our failure to vote for leaders is why we're in the situation we're in today. Me ? I'm fed up with voting for another damn politician.
IF you investigate and research Rick Perry's background, even while he was a democrat, you will find he was the odd man out because he was so conservative.
Also, did you know that Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater republican?
PEOPLE EVOLVE AND CHANGE. Rick Perry evolved for the better.
Do some research ok?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.