Posted on 08/30/2011 3:42:19 PM PDT by smoothsailing
by Ben Smith & Maggie Haberman
August 30, 2011
In his two weeks as a presidential candidate, Rick Perry has done something that neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney could do: wake up the left.
Perry panic has spread from the conference rooms of Washington, D.C., to the coffee shops of Brooklyn, with the realization that the conservative Texan could conceivably become the 45th president of the United States, a wave of alarm centering around Perry’s drawling, small-town affect and stands on core cultural issues such as women’s rights, gun control, the death penalty and the separation of church and state.
The epidemic of lefty angst isn’t just a matter of specific Perry policies though; it goes to the heart of the liberal worldview. His smashing debut on the presidential stage suggests that the victory of an urban liberal Democrat, Barack Obama, wasn’t a step toward a more progressive nation, but just a leftward swing of an increasingly wild pendulum, now poised to rocket to the right.
“His entry in the race is a signal and a wake-up call,” the Rev. Al Sharpton told POLITICO.
Perry, Sharpton said, “is looking to go to the O.K. Corral and start shooting…. Rather than the left get caught sleeping, we better load up, because he is bringing it.”
For Democrats, the pre-Perry GOP primary process was hardly for the faint of heart, as the other candidates have jockeyed to show who dislikes Obama the most. But even as the primary is fought on conservative turf, liberal leaders say they and their constituents see Perry as far worse than your average, hated Republican, and indeed as bad – if not worse – than his hated predecessor in Austin, George W. Bush. And progressives who might have had a hard time getting worked up about Mitt Romney find themselves struggling for superlatives with which to express their fear of a President Perry.
“His work as governor is unparalleled in its frontal assault on women,” said Siobhan Bennett, the president of the Women’s Campaign Forum, citing statistics on women living in poverty and without health care in Texas, and Perry’s active opposition to abortion. “He has gone farther out on a limb legislatively in his capacity as governor and has been expressly anti-woman in the legislation he has done.”
“He is beyond what we expect from conservative Republicans on the gun issue,” said Dennis Henigan, the acting president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, who cited Perry’s support for gun rights on college campuses and said it was a sharp contrast with Romney’s “moderate” record. Perry’s rise, he said, had already become “a strong mobilizing force” for gun control activists, whose agenda has been largely ignored by the Obama administration.
“People are perceiving a very real threat that he could be the Republican nominee,” said Henigan, calling the prospect “quite frightening.”
Barry Lynn, whose Americans United for the Separation of Church and State is on the front lines of keeping religion out of public life, also labeled Perry an extreme figure.
“He doesn’t just go to religious right gatherings – he creates religious right gatherings and that’s a big difference,” he said, citing The Response, an 30,000-person event Perry led in Houston in early August.
Lynn said last week’s polls showing Perry in the lead among Republicans had startled his group’s supporters.
“Any time there’s a very viable candidate who has taken on the mantle of a crusader for Christ and ignorer of the Constitution, that makes very many people who care about the real Constitution very nervous,” he said.
Backers of another longstanding liberal cause, campaign finance reform, see a similar threat from Perry, given his career tapping the bottomless Texas wells of oil money and his current status as beneficiary of not one but several new Super PACs.
“It looks like Rick Perry’s campaign and its supporters are taking secret corporate spending to a new level,” said New York City Public Advocate Bill DeBlasio, who has campaigned against corporate involvement in politics. “His actions personify the corporate sponsored campaigns that many of us feared Citizens United would create.”
The death penalty, another longstanding liberal target, has figured prominently in Perry’s career: He has presided over more executions than any other governor, commuting just one sentence in his three terms years and vetoing a bill that would have banned the execution of the mentally handicapped, something the Supreme Court later outlawed.
Richard Dieter, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said Perry’s conduct of the death penalty was in fact “typical” for a conservative Southern governor, and that the high numbers largely reflected the size of his state and the length of his tenure; the rate of executions has actually declined since the Bush years.
But for death penalty foes, a symbol of Perry’s shortcomings on the issue is his rebuff in 2004 of the Innocence Project’s petitions on behalf of Cameron Todd Willingham, a man convicted of murdering his family on the basis of scientific evidence arson experts described as unreliable. In 2009, Perry abruptly replaced officials who were investigating the case.
“That’s a worrisome series of events about what people are most concerned about when they think about the death penalty – and that is innocence,” said Dieter.
Perry is certainly to Romney’s right on many of these policy issues. Romney, for instance, pushed legislation in Massachusetts that would have reinstated a death penalty only in very limited, carefully vetted circumstances. But Perry isn’t necessarily far outside the Republican mainstream in, for instance, his implacable opposition to taxes and abortion, or his support for religion in public life. His stated support for states rights might, in theory, make him less likely to intervene on social issues than some of his GOP rivals.
But Perry’s combination of policy, Southern style and an easy, unstudied adherence to contemporary religious and political conservative doctrine has put him beyond the reach even of some Democrats who sometimes cross the aisle. Former New York Mayor Ed Koch, who endorsed George W. Bush in 2004 and has criticized Obama’s foreign policy, cited Perry’s recent stated skepticism about the theory of evolution.
“I can’t support anyone who doesn’t believe in evolution – that to me is too much,” said Koch.
And while conservatives enjoy Perry’s ability to enrage their liberal foes, some Democratic strategists have also welcomed his emergence.
“Whether he’s the nominee or not, he absolutely helps fire up our base,” said Jennifer Palmieri, the vice president for communications at the liberal Center for American Progress. “To the degree to which progressives are disaffected and unenthusiastic – this is their ‘holy sh**’ moment.”
Clinton strategist James Carville, however, said Perry remains his second choice.
“Actually we’d all prefer Michele Bachmann,” he said.
Emily Schultheis contributed.
© 2011 POLITICO LLC
On the other hand, I am no more thrilled with any of the other announced candidates for the Republican presidential nomination. I will probably end up voting for whichever one I think has the best chance of beating Obama and will actively campaign for whoever gets the nomination.
We desperately need another Reagan and I just don't see anyone in the race who comes close.
>> The dwindling Ron Paul contingent is running on fumes.
What’s new? The Ron Paul contingent here has ALWAYS run on fumes. And if they have their way, those fumes will be legalized! :-)
Oh I know let him be appointed to either USAG or Homeland Security Secretary when a Republican is elected to the WH.
Basically, not much to understand. He’s not a Conservative. His disciples here so desperately want some good-looking “Conservative Messiah” to take out Zero, that they’re willing to overlook his record and fool themselves into believing he’s everything THEY want him to be. Where have we seen that before ? He’s an opportunist. If Gore had been elected President back when he supported him, he would’ve gotten a plum job in his administration. Ditto for Rudy. As I point out to the Perrybots, if Rick had been a FReeper in 2007/08, he’d have been ZOT’ted (banned) from this website for not being a Conservative (for supporting Rudy). It drives them nuts. We can do better than him, and we must, if we’re to get a Conservative agenda passed in DC.
You are and have been aworthless shill, probably paid, for a long time. You are the meaningless one and most people already know it or will realize it shortly. When should we expect the all caps posts to begin? I see them coming soon, as you lose your arguments again and continue to scream RINO at everyone.
sorry to hear all that.
Your projections betray you.
Oh really sir? Show me where he has been an abomination to being a conservative.
YOU are looking for purity and perfection. You are obtuse.
The announcement from Gov. Palin should be forthcoming and then we’ll have the candidate to rally around.
>> An actual Conservative
So who do you like? And no, I’m not tryng to start a fight. Just curious.
>> You are and have been aworthless shill, probably paid, for a long time
Not fair. And not true either.
He just happens to disagree with you (and prolly with me too). But the things you accuse him of are simply false.
Yup, really. And I laugh derisively everytime I hear the “purity/perfection” card trotted out. That’s the equivalent of the race card to RINOs.
Nobody is conservative enough for you. You don’t mind losing the senate seat in California to dems, you would not have minded Alexi winning in Illinois, seems to me you like democrats better than republicans.
Name the candidates you like, please tell us. You are paid by someone, why not just tell us.
As I’ve stated frequently, my endorsement goes to Gov. Palin. She’s had my endorsement since 2008.
Typo. I was thinking about the 2008 primary (I try to block out most of what has happened since then). I meant to say that I would have actively campaigned for him if he had run against Hillary. I would still campaign for him if he would run against Chuckie.
I don't particularly care about Hillary's successor, Gillibrand, though I would probably send Rudy a campaign contribution if he would run against her.
>> The announcement from Gov. Palin should be forthcoming
Never mind my #71; I see now.
If I may respectfully ask: what if she does NOT run? Surely a man of your integrity and common sense will admit that’s a possibility.
THEN who do you like?
Oh that’s nothing. It’s usually ‘you’re a liberal DU troll or Paulbot’ line.
Really? I doubt that.
>> It’s usually ‘you’re a liberal DU troll or Paulbot’ line.
And sometimes they are! ;-)
But not in fieldmarshaldj’s case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.