Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Earned These Entitlements
Redding Record Searchlight ^ | August 29, 2011 | John Cleckner

Posted on 08/29/2011 7:22:55 AM PDT by Poundstone

I earned these 'entitlements'

I believe that most citizens do not understand what a federal entitlement program is. There are earned entitlements versus a special government entitlement that is given to an individual who needs assistance that is mandated by law.

What is a government entitlement? Note below that some are free and some are not! Why the government is lumping these programs together is beyond me: Only Congress would think this was a proper thing to do. How can a program like military retirement be linked with food stamps? The programs I am associated with should never be diminished by the federal government because they are either paid for by me and my wife or I have earned them. Most citizens believe all the federal entitlements are giveaway social programs and that is not true.

(Excerpt) Read more at redding.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benefits; federal; government; pension
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-279 next last
To: icanhasbailout
>>Let me know when you get to the "acceptance" stage of grief.<<

Tell ya what slick. Look up the system in Galveston county Texas and then come back and ask when I will get to the grief stage. It was evidently long before you were born that some of us realized what this government is.

FWIW I’ve been retired now for some time and am living rather comfortably. I travel in a 40’ coach and have zero debt. Next time you are tempted to over generalize think of the phrase that starts with “better to keep silent”.

181 posted on 08/29/2011 10:56:32 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

If you were prepared for it then you should know better than to call SS anything but welfare.


182 posted on 08/29/2011 10:58:31 AM PDT by icanhasbailout (Draft Napolitano 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

bookmark


183 posted on 08/29/2011 10:59:42 AM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

Sorry, no. I don’t really care whether somebody has “paid in” or not. Entire generations of people have now “paid in” without paying the least bit of attention to what was being done with the money, or trying to stop it. So screw ‘em. The SS system could have been fixed, maybe, a number of years ago. We’re well past that time.


184 posted on 08/29/2011 11:02:47 AM PDT by Sloth (If a tax break counts as "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should be a "deposit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bookmark.

This will be a 500 plus thread.


185 posted on 08/29/2011 11:07:51 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

For later...


186 posted on 08/29/2011 11:11:21 AM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
A contract is not a suicide pact.

Contracts are voided all the time, for all sorts of reasons. Heck, in one of my old jobs Coke and Pepsico were famous to ignoring any contract that went against their own interest at any time.

There is no money. None. The promises made were lies then, and lies now.

Do we work to change that or just collapse the system?

187 posted on 08/29/2011 11:13:46 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
In reality, life spans will decrease and retirement age will increase.

I cringe to say that, but it is the truth. You can't just stop working for thirty years and expect that someone else take care of you.

My grandfather died at 83, my father will probably not make that, and I will be lucky to make it as long as either of them. There is no money, and I will expect my kids, or grand kids, to pay for me. It is my job to save for them.

We got turned around as a society somewhere.

188 posted on 08/29/2011 11:20:51 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Crazy ole coot

“Just a little more on military retirement:
1) Move where and when you are told.”

All of your points were good, however I’d like to add to this one. This results in not being able to purchase a home and build that equity, although recently this isn’t very detrimental! ;-)


189 posted on 08/29/2011 11:22:35 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout
Yeah, I figured you’d come up with something like that. Do you also think contracts when broken are no big deal? If you don’t think much beyond what’s for supper you don’t understand that those who never paid into the system, those who have lived off the largesse of others for generations, and those who scam the system with fake or contrived disabilities with complicity of a socialistic government are why the system failed. If the SS system had been run as an "insurance" as it was originally called it would be in fine shape just as the system in Galveston county is.

It’s not the baby boomer generation that ruined the system. That generation by and large consisted of hard workers who paid into the system for a lifetime and didn’t use the system until retirement. It was and is the generations since who have learned to scam the system.

190 posted on 08/29/2011 11:25:57 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

What you and others are demanding is that we,and our kids, pay up to three times more than you put in.

Simply put, demographics are going to crush SS. When the Boomers start retiring, there will not be enough people working to pay the taxes to keep them all on the level of benefits promised. They didn’t have enough kids, and are living much longer.

But I will compromise. I will pay for you, and will expect not to receive one red cent from SS. But it ends with my generation. Tax everyone over 35 (I will 36 soon), but leave my kids out of it.

All my life I had to shoulder the burden for those who could or would not. That is my lot in life. But I will not stand by and let others saddle the next generation with crushing debt because they were lied to. It has to stop.


191 posted on 08/29/2011 11:28:27 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone; Syncro; Kaslin; Kartographer; Cincinatus' Wife; hocndoc; NationalSpotlight; ...

“- - - lets refocus this discussion into solutions - - - - “

The solution was given to us by none other than the protegee of FDR, yep, the father of THE GREAT SOCIETY, LBJ himself !

LBJ told all of his cabinet members to put on his desk their plan to cut 15 % off their department’s expenditures. Somewhere in “Freedom of Information World” is LBJ’s Master cutting plan. ( Are you listening Freeper sleuths? )
Even though LBJ never used the plan to give us “Guns and Butter” as he put it, LBJ did “did turn down the lights in the White House.”

Wow! What symbolism! The Liberal Intelligentsia Elite ( L.I.E. ) Media were so pleased that the financial crisis of the day was over that Federal spending has never looked back on those dark days, so long ago.

My point is that the US Federal Government will never agree to where or how much to cut spending.

Hence, use LBJ’s Master Plan and cut every part of the Federal Government equally.

My humble, but always correct plan:
1. Cut baseline salaries for all Federal employees, contractors, advisors, and other’s others 5 % per year, starting on the third anniversary of the US Congress permanent cancellation of the US Budget. ( October 1, 2011 ).
2. Cut the baseline salary of all members of Congress 10 % per year retroactive to September 15, 2008, and continuing until the National Debt is paid in full. ( I know, but make it the end of the Month if you like).
3. Privatize all “Entitlement” Programs that will not be solvent by the time the current National Debt Ceiling is reached. ( Don’t use the Can’t Be Obama projections).
4. Have each elected Federal politician sign “THE MAGNA DEBTA” which states that the United States of America is NOT to big to fail.
5. Freeze all “Entitlement” plan enrollments, so the burden purchased by private companies will be minimized during the “entitlement” privatization bidding process.
6. Rigorously enforce the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law against all US Federal Trust Funds.
7. Pay off the Total USA National Debt.


192 posted on 08/29/2011 11:35:30 AM PDT by Graewoulf ( obamatrauma"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Good post.


193 posted on 08/29/2011 11:37:17 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

We really have gotten turned around. We have gone from parents and grandparents helping their kids start off in life with a down payment on a house or money for furniture to the point where the grandparents and parents take 7% to 10% of their kids’ and grandkids’ checks every week to support themselves.

And, in part, it is an unintended consequence of the destruction of the extended family. Families used to live together and all chip in for expenses. A son lived with his parents until he got married. He didn’t sit on his ass without a job like some of today’s kids do. He worked and paid some of the expenses while still being able to save for a down payment on a house when he got married. And then when the parents got old, they moved in with the kids.

At some point in the 60s that changed to the point where neither parents nor kids want to live together. And the result is that the parents need Social Security to live a decent life. The brutal truth is that America can’t afford it anymore. We are not the wealthy nation we were. We squandered the wealth over about 40 to 50 years. Parents and kids are going to have to live together again because we, as a society, can’t afford to subsidize them living separately. It won’t impact today’s seniors. There is still enough borrowing power to let them live as they are. But within the next 20 or 30 years, its going to be blindingly obvious that we are broke and the credit card has been maxed out.


194 posted on 08/29/2011 11:37:40 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
Social Security is not a contract. It is nothing more than a tax, the Supreme Court ruled on this many many years ago.

Flemming v. Nestor 1960. Look it up. Here's the cache from the SS gov website itself (interestingly the page appears to have been erased recently!)

Mind you this is 51 years that this has been the case, so there's no excuse for any person not to be aware of the terms under which Social Security is collected (by force) and distributed (at the sole discretion of the government).

This whole time too, the Boomer generation knew it was unusually large and had every reason to know that attempting to retire and collect SS payments en masse would crash the system. For 51 years they voted and voted and voted and time and time again they declined to change the system. When the time came to step up to the plate, they made Social Security the "third rail of American politics" (I heard that phrase so often I get nausea even quoting it.) They have ZERO reason to complain at the mathematically inevitable consequences of their own actions.

I guess personal responsibility joins property rights in the garbage bin of principles discarded when there's real money on the line.

195 posted on 08/29/2011 11:38:29 AM PDT by icanhasbailout (Draft Napolitano 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: CSM

You are correct. I was just making a list off the top of my head. Didn’t take too much thinking either.

Thank you!


196 posted on 08/29/2011 11:38:33 AM PDT by Crazy ole coot (Freedom is NOT free. Thank our military for your freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
You paid in a lot of money in tax and there is no asset there to pay you back

Oh yes there is.

Ya find it ironic the corrupt bloated government continues to subsidies millions of illegal aliens on the backs of the tax payers, but tells the tax payers their too broke to pay Americans for what they seized from their pay checks over the course of their work histories.

If the corrupt government is broke, how are they possibly able to support half of Mexico in the U.S.?

Are they using the income from Americans to pay for millions of illegal aliens? Yes they are.

Americans are not only being gang raped by this government, but their being robbed while getting raped.

There is a solution to this.

197 posted on 08/29/2011 11:39:38 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
Parents and kids are going to have to live together again because we, as a society, can’t afford to subsidize them living separately.

I already told my kids they better study hard, so that they can afford a nice, big house, because we're moving in.

198 posted on 08/29/2011 11:40:23 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

And there is nothing wrong with it!! I told my mother she can come live with us. I have two extra rooms at this point. My friend turned her large basement into a “mother in law suite” that is really nice. It has a separate entrance so its not like the parents and kids are in each others’ hair. Its a great solution, especially if you have kids who need to be watched or taken places. As long as there is some ability to each have your own space. I hear seniors who say they won’t move in with their kids because they don’t want to be a “burden” and I just shake my head.


199 posted on 08/29/2011 11:43:47 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout

You were educated in the public school system weren’t you.


200 posted on 08/29/2011 11:44:59 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson