Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry calls Social Security 'monstrous lie'
Houston Chronicle ^ | August 28, 2011 | PEGGY FIKAC, AUSTIN BUREAU

Posted on 08/28/2011 3:46:33 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

OTTUMWA, Iowa - Riding high in the polls, Gov. Rick Perry rode into Iowa on Saturday with tough talk on President Obama, the economy and foreign policy and a declaration that Social Security is not only a Ponzi scheme but a "monstrous lie" for younger people.

"If you're for the status quo in America, I'm not your guy," Perry told an overflow crowd eager to see the presidential candidate at The Vine Coffeehouse, where people repeatedly sang God Bless America - once to try to encourage Perry to come in from shaking hands with people outside.

Asked by a woman in the crowd about Social Security being viewed as an entitlement program, Perry reiterated the suggestion in his anti-Washington book, Fed Up!, that the program amounts to a Ponzi scheme.

"It is a Ponzi scheme for these young people. The idea that they're working and paying into Social Security today, that the current program is going to be there for them, is a lie," Perry said. "It is a monstrous lie on this generation, and we can't do that to them."

Later, in Des Moines, when a reporter asked about the suggestion that his campaign was backing off some positions in the staunch states-rights book, Perry said, "I haven't backed off anything in my book. So read the book again and get it right."

National conversation

He told the Ottumwa crowd that for people who are drawing Social Security or near eligibility "like me," he wasn't proposing a change in the program. But he said there should be a national conversation about potential changes for others, including raising the age of eligibility and establishing a threshold based on a person's means.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: economy; perry; perry2012; retirement; rickperry; screwedthepooch; shothimselfinthefoot; socialsecurity; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-163 next last
To: RFEngineer

No, we can’t agree that there’s a lie in there somewhere. Social security is a ponzi scheme that should be dismantled, but it would be monstrous to simply kick the elderly and retirees to the curb by refusing to pay them anything at all any more.

The only “lie” here is from those who think that it’s just as simple as repealing the social security taxes, shutting down the SSA, and putting a stop-order on any outstanding benefit checks.

Just because social security is a ponzi scheme that should not have been set up in the first place is no excuse to impoverish people who made their retirement plans on the reasonable expectation that they would get social security when they retired.

Dumping elderly retirees into the street to satisfy some “foolish consistency” of a coterie of so-called conservatives is the real monstrosity here.


81 posted on 08/28/2011 7:24:05 AM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Will88

“Yes, it is the point. A point you failed to make in your #54”

Now now....the response in #54 was specific to the statement that “social security is solvent for years”

and this IS a thread on social security.


82 posted on 08/28/2011 7:25:20 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Perhaps if we called Social Security “THE FIRST NATIONAL SAVINGS BANK AND TRUST” it could get a trillion dollar bailout from the Fed. and Congress.


83 posted on 08/28/2011 7:29:13 AM PDT by KDD (When the government boot is on your neck, it matters not whether it is the right boot or the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

“Just because social security is a ponzi scheme that should not have been set up in the first place is no excuse to impoverish people who made their retirement plans on the reasonable expectation that they would get social security when they retired.”

My judgmental friend, it is the nature of EVERY “Ponzi Scheme” to end abruptly.

The end of every Ponzi is inherently unfair to everyone who hasn’t gotten their money out.

What is cruel is to not deal with the reality that Social Security IS a ponzi scheme and will end abruptly one day.

Perry’s proposal is to give the impression that younger folks won’t have to pay, and that older folks won’t have any risk of ever not receiving a check. That is a baldfaced political lie of the type every politician tells, whether democrat or republican.


84 posted on 08/28/2011 7:29:40 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: KDD

“Perhaps if we called Social Security “THE FIRST NATIONAL SAVINGS BANK AND TRUST” it could get a trillion dollar bailout from the Fed. and Congress.”

While you are obviously kidding, your proposal has all the sound financial elements of just about any government program.


85 posted on 08/28/2011 7:32:12 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

“A little less personality cult”? That is a laugh. You’ve not been quite so sanguine about personality cults when it comes to the Palin cult that flourishes around here.

More to the point, if you think that there is some sort of a “lie” - your word - in the view that social security is a ponzi scheme that should no longer be foisted on the young but yet that current retirees should continue to get their full benefits, and you think that younger generations should no longer be subjected to the social security taxes, then you are necessarily wedded to only one view: social security benefits to current retirees should be cut off immediately.

Why? Because so long as you take the position - as you do - that social security should no longer be imposed on current workers, then benefits have to be cut to current retirees because any other means of funding those benefits - either out of general revenues (i.e., income taxes) or out of additional federal debt - will necessarily impose the costs of those benefits on current workers, either through immediate increases in income taxes, or through increases in income taxes later on when that additional debt has to be paid.

You cannot have it both ways. You cannot have your cake and eat it, too. And a foolish consistency is still a hobgoblin of little minds, whether they be left-wing or right-wing.


86 posted on 08/28/2011 7:32:42 AM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: DB; Cincinatus' Wife

I fully expect social security to be means tested, and for me to lose my SS benefits that I paid for (supposedly) for 40 years.

And the good news is that doing that WILL show what it has always been - a welfare program for old people.

I dislike Perry on a number of issues, and will never trust him, but I will probably vote for him. I’m not as confident as many conservatives that this election will be a cakewalk. I expect it to be a hard fought battle, with the media lying every step of the way. It will be fought with all the intensity and dishonesty of the union fight in Wisconsin, and Perry - who is well left of me - is about as far right as has a hope of winning. And while I trust Palin, she honestly lacks the executive experience needed to make things happen (as did Obama, and look what that has bought the left).


87 posted on 08/28/2011 7:40:54 AM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; RoosterRedux; jonrick46; deepbluesea; RockinRight; TexMom7; potlatch; ...
Perry Ping....

IF you'd rather NOT be pinged FReepmail me.

IF you'd like to be added FReepmail me. Thanks.

88 posted on 08/28/2011 7:42:20 AM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

“You’ve not been quite so sanguine about personality cults when it comes to the Palin cult that flourishes around here.”

LOL....Palin isn’t running, nor has she proposed anything on Social Security, but as a politician, I’m quite sure she’ll lie about social security just like Perry does!

“More to the point, if you think that there is some sort of a “lie” - your word - in the view that social security is a ponzi scheme that should no longer be foisted on the young but yet that current retirees should continue to get their full benefits, and you think that younger generations should no longer be subjected to the social security taxes....”

This is precisely the lie that Perry is telling, my friend.

” ...then you are necessarily wedded to only one view: social security benefits to current retirees should be cut off immediately.”

No, I am wedded to the view that as a ponzi scheme, Social Security WILL end abruptly, and that we should be preparing as families with older members, and as local communities to deal with this problem that is as sure to land at our feet as the end of the Perry-declared “Ponzi-Scheme”.

You must be wedded to the view that a Ponzi Scheme can go on forever, which is a decidedly incorrect view.

“You cannot have it both ways. You cannot have your cake and eat it, too. And a foolish consistency is still a hobgoblin of little minds, whether they be left-wing or right-wing.”

As I explained above, I do not have it both ways as you say.

However, if I agree with you completely, we’ll both be completely wrong - so allow me to be realistic about the demise of Social Security, and I’ll allow you to continue to believe that somehow this is a Ponzi Scheme unlike the rest.


89 posted on 08/28/2011 7:43:37 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” Ralph Waldo Emerson.

The resemblance is striking.


90 posted on 08/28/2011 7:46:29 AM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
I am 56 and I do not expect any SS or Medicare whatsoever.
It will not be there. The math is what it is and we are on our way to a Default, Economic Collapse of some kind, or Congress will wake up and be forced to cut spending 45%.
In any case those out there in Baby Boomer land can forget about those Entitlements. SS could possibly be saved but probably with lower payout.
Let us also get something straight you and everyone else did not pay in to get anything, you paid for the older generations, i.e. your parents and grandparents. There was never anything put back for you or me. Basically we took care of our families so to speak.
91 posted on 08/28/2011 7:48:19 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

You think the SS recepients in Floriduh don’t think SS is a lie? Everyone knows its a ponzi scheme, the trick is to get what you can back it before it goes bellyup.

Regarding the GenX’ers, most will still be hangin out at Mom’s any way.


92 posted on 08/28/2011 7:51:18 AM PDT by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
and this IS a thread on social security.

Now, now, isn't it really a thread about Perry's statement that SS is a "monstrous lie", which certainly opens the discussion to the possibility that both Perry and the posters here are putting far too much emphasis on the future problems of SS and far too little on the future problems of other government programs, several of which are even bigger demands on US finances than SS.

People who think SS is our biggest future financial problem are seriously mistaken, but SS about all some are able to focus on.

93 posted on 08/28/2011 7:52:16 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

“The resemblance is striking.”

I note you do not deal with your own foolish consistency, but you can quote Ralph Waldo Emerson, so somehow feel that you’ve made some sort of point.

So be it.


94 posted on 08/28/2011 7:52:29 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
Did you really say “reform” in conjunction with a reference to a government spending program? See now that’s funny.

I would call "reform" what would be required to wean people off the teat.

I don't think it would be right to take it away from people who paid into it all their working lives. I can think that way because...

I'm just thankful I never paid into it and never got a check.

95 posted on 08/28/2011 7:57:32 AM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Will88

“People who think SS is our biggest future financial problem are seriously mistaken, but SS about all some are able to focus on.”

As you’ll note, I do not suffer from this problem. I repeatedly point out, as you will no doubt be happy to find, that SS comes out of the same pot of federal spending as everything else.


96 posted on 08/28/2011 7:58:18 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Which foolish consistency is that? Please demonstrate the inconsistency between the view that social security is a ponzi scheme that should be wound down but not so abruptly that it leaves 80 year old widows in the gutter?


97 posted on 08/28/2011 7:59:14 AM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
I am still angry that they refused to look at Bush’s proposal - back when I was 48.

Me, too and I never conributed to SS.

Congress wants their hands on that money IMO.

98 posted on 08/28/2011 8:02:02 AM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

“I don’t think it would be right to take it away from people who paid into it all their working lives.”

But the problem is that Perry declared it (truthfully) a “monstrous lie” and a “Ponzi Scheme” - so therefore if you believe Perry, and I do believe him, then you believe that Social Security, as a ponzi, will end abruptly.

Therefore what do we do to insulate people from this eventuality? I think we all know that another federal government program is not the answer......


99 posted on 08/28/2011 8:03:01 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Why is it, that instead of discussing the topic, you must say it’s not enough and so it is a worthless topic?

If you don’t want to talk about it, find another thread where the topic has something complete and robust enough for you to exercise your genius.


100 posted on 08/28/2011 8:03:11 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson