Many different journalists investigated Bush, not just liberals. Byron York -- a conservative -- did a complete work up on Bush's TANG record. It wasn't all lies. Facts were involved, and they could be checked. Records existed, and they could be verified. We simply do not have this information on 0bama.
Go out and read a book -- just one, any one will do, even if all it has is pictures to color in. Them come back and post something either 1) true or 2) logical. [I'm charitable; it doesn't even have to be both.] Until you do, please, stop posting; I'm asking you to do this for the sake of your own credibility. If you aren't simply playing a role, you make the entire universe a little stupider every time you post something.
And what did all that investigating of Bush result in? Oh yeah, he won re-election anyway. And that’s my point. We obsessed on Clinton’s past, he got re-elected; they obsessed on Bush’s past, he got re-elected. So you want to make it three in a row.
Obama’s past does not matter. It’s 30 freaking years ago, it has no meaning, the American people don’t give a rip. You resorting to insults just proved me right, if the facts were on your side you wouldn’t need ad hominems, so I’m gonna keep posting and you go ahead and keep being wrong. and remember every insult you throw just proves you’re wrong, and you know it.