Skip to comments.
Rail Runner: Go big or go lean? (NM-Richardson's Railroad, bleeding rivers of red-ink)
KRQE News 13 Albuquerque ^
| August 16, 2011
| Dean Staley
Posted on 08/17/2011 7:42:08 AM PDT by CedarDave
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: CedarDave
When I was in ABQ back in June, we looked into riding the train. I was shocked at how inexpensive the tickets are. It’s no wonder the thing is losing money so quickly (it would lose money no matter what - that’s what passenger rail does).
The tram ride to the top of the mountains was hideously expensive by comparison.
To: Iron Munro
Get Obama and the democrats to pass an ObamaRide law requiring every citizen to purchase an annual train pass from the nearest commuter railroad. New Mexico has already done that. $60M deficit for 2M people means that the "average" New Mexican purchases a $30 train pass every year -- and then needs to pay to actually get on the train.
22
posted on
08/17/2011 8:50:50 AM PDT
by
AZLiberty
(No tag today.)
To: CedarDave
Maybe you put slot machines on some of the trains, Im not sure, said Abraham, who is also mayor of Los Ranchos de Albuquerque.For hack politicians, there's nothing that a little casino gambling can't fix.
23
posted on
08/17/2011 8:52:49 AM PDT
by
BfloGuy
(Workers and consumers are, of course, identical.)
To: Red Badger
Badge,
If they’re gonna have slots, they might as well have alcohol and pole dancers!
To: Iron Munro
Solution: Every government employee must ride the train from ABQ to SF every day (including weekends) at $100 per round trip. No exceptions AND 80 percent of their salaries will be taxed at 100 percent to cover operating costs. I know . . . what if you're a gubmint employee in Rattlesnake, NM, population 2 (not including snakes)? I guess you'll have to commute to ABQ or SF (whichever is closer) and you cannot use a state vehicle.
OR, you could shutdown this stupidity and sell the thing. Is Amtrak interested? How about Indian or Chinese National Railways? What's the scrap price for a railroad? Oh, yeah, since there's no railroad we don't need state union employees either. Fire them all.
25
posted on
08/17/2011 9:07:27 AM PDT
by
MasterGunner01
(To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
To: Let's Roll
At first it was at least competitive timewise with commuting by car, but then every little pueblo (Indian reservation) demanded a stop on its land so family didnt have to use private vehicles to get grandma to the doctor in SF or ABQ once a month, so now its mostly tourists.
Whoa... just over one and a half hours for 60 miles - and they call this high speed rail?
http://www.nmrailrunner.com/PDF/weekday-2011-v1.pdf
26
posted on
08/17/2011 9:11:23 AM PDT
by
az_gila
To: CedarDave
We do not have the population density to support this train. Had the $$ been used to expand the lanes between ABQ and Santa Fe they would have been spent more wisely. Richardson’s legacy is not only that of complete and utter corruption, but a train that will eventually (hopefully sooner rather than later) be shut down, sold and just be a sad memory.
There remains the issue of many people in ABQ working in Santa Fe and the long commute, but some new thinking about buses or vans would be far less expensive and would have a closer relationship to cost/benefit for the users.
27
posted on
08/17/2011 9:12:10 AM PDT
by
JudyM
(JudyM)
To: MasterGunner01
Solution: Every government employee must ride the train from ABQ to SF every day (including weekends) at $100 per round trip. No exceptions AND 80 percent of their salaries will be taxed at 100 percent to cover operating costs. I know . . . what if you're a gubmint employee in Rattlesnake, NM, population 2 (not including snakes)? I guess you'll have to commute to ABQ or SF (whichever is closer) and you cannot use a state vehicle.There was Republican-sponsored legislation introduced a couple of years ago to do just that! Of course in a Rat controlled legislature with a Rat administration, it went nowhere and would have been vetoed by Richardson if it had.
28
posted on
08/17/2011 10:25:28 AM PDT
by
CedarDave
(Use the FR sidebar to track favorite keyword threads.)
To: CedarDave
Rail Runner: Go big or go lean? How about just: GO
AWAY
To: the_devils_advocate_666
Wisconsin did and turned down $850 million for its proposed boondoggle.
30
posted on
08/17/2011 10:44:51 AM PDT
by
UB355
(Slower traffic keep right)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Every HS Rail project in this country has turned into a huge boondoggle. Yet, they keep on promoting them like they are some kind of miracle of technology that will solve every problem, from jobs to transportation costs. If they were financially sound and of profitable outlook, the rail industry would be building them overnight as fast as they could. The government is full of idiots and near-do-wells that think they know better than the people who actually build things and make a profit.....................
31
posted on
08/17/2011 11:03:13 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
To: CedarDave
There are so many watermelons in New Mexico...couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch.
To: CedarDave
Sounds like it’s time to revive the bill.
33
posted on
08/17/2011 2:09:38 PM PDT
by
MasterGunner01
(To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson