Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Has Millions Of Reasons For Delaying Her Announcement
08/14/2011 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 08/14/2011 12:00:53 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-235 next last
To: Brices Crossroads
When she is nominated, I pray to God that she doesn't make the Reagan mistake of choosing the runner up as a running mate. I can just see Romney or Perry as VP and then after eight wonderful years of booming economy and rebuilding American prestige we get another George Bush in the form of Mitt Romney or Rick Perry. Either of them would get four years and then lose to the next Bill Clinton. Bush I was the establishment candidate, and would have easily beaten Carter, just as Romney or Perry will be able to beat Obama. Reagan was stronger and closer to the hearts of real people, like Palin is.

Do we really feel so insecure that we will settle for a Compromise Candidate? Romney and Perry are both made for the media candidates, good-looking white guys who can be turned into the next stupid conservative. That is what we get when we root for the guy with the best chance of winning. If we let the media and the pundits choose our candidate, we will get another Bush, plain and simple. I want to see Obama beaten, but to be stuck with another George Bush I, with results similar to Read My Lips and then getting our troops into Somalia on the way out the door, NO THANK YOU!

41 posted on 08/14/2011 12:40:40 PM PDT by webheart (Just saying.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Yep, no big donors and not enough small donors.

Halloween sounds about right.


42 posted on 08/14/2011 12:42:04 PM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay
‘First Dude’ wants nothing to do with living in DC.

"First Dude" is 100% behind Sarah running. With the Palins, it isn't about anything other than duty to country.

43 posted on 08/14/2011 12:42:47 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Your photo reminds me of that picture of a snarling John McCain I see posted here now and then.

44 posted on 08/14/2011 12:43:19 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sarah fan UK

“BC - Maybe Mitt will chip in some cash to keep her viable eh?”

Has he got that much? Seriously, as Bachmann begins to fade, how can Mitt be sure the money will be spent on the campaign and not something else?


45 posted on 08/14/2011 12:44:42 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
Everyone's a soothsayer.

.


46 posted on 08/14/2011 12:45:18 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Question - if you had made up your mind to run for President a month or more ago, but for strategic reasons can’t/won’t announce your candidacy until September, what would you say to the public in the meantime?


47 posted on 08/14/2011 12:45:53 PM PDT by Jess79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

As always, well done.


48 posted on 08/14/2011 12:46:10 PM PDT by Gator113 (Palin 2012, period.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
Thanks for doing this, BC, and you're dead-on. Money is going to be the key for Palin, especially in light of the very different primary scenario this year vs. 1980 and other years.

The RNC rigged the system this year to create far more primaries where delegates are doled out proportionately. This GREATLY favors the well-financed Establishment campaigns and guarantees a much longer process. It's no accident they did this.

It's gonna be up to us 'hobbits' who support Palin to bear the brunt of the financing. I think she'll set records for small donations but will it be enough? That's been my concern for quite a while.

As you pointed out, Reagan had similar concerns. Several years back, Chris Matthews discussed the similarities between Fred Thompson's late entry and Reagan's. Here's a 2 min. video of this discussion which includes Reagan's own comments on the issue. He was concerned about his own personal financial situation at the time and I'm sure that's a factor for Gov. Palin as well:

Ronald Reagan June 21, 1979 (2 min. video)

Palin is following the Reagan model. With virtually 100% name ID, she doesn't need to slog around months in advance trying to build up recognition. She'll use her name ID, manipulate the media to keep her name out front, and her committed volunteer base to shorten the campaign and conserve resources for when it counts.

49 posted on 08/14/2011 12:46:10 PM PDT by Al B. ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Hadn’t thought of that, but you nailed it!


50 posted on 08/14/2011 12:47:00 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Tickets to vote in the Straw Poll were $30, not #35... and Sarah Palin visited the State Fair Friday - that’s Des Moines, not Ames. To my knowledge, she’s not been to Ames ever. Certainly not this week. Check your facts.


51 posted on 08/14/2011 12:48:57 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Hope & Change - I'm out of hope, and change is all I have left every week | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
I am tired of the tease. This is not what I expect from someone who bills herself as a different kind of politician.

It's not a tease. If reporters would quit asking the question, she wouldn't even bring up the subject. Palin will announce at a time of her choosing, not some impatient reporter.

Imagine you dating a girl/guy and relatives repeatedly ask you when are you going to get married? Now, you and your date have discussed it and have set a date but you really don't want it known at that time. Should you have to tell your relatives anyway just because they demand to know?

52 posted on 08/14/2011 12:50:31 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

“I am tired of the tease. This is not what I expect from someone who bills herself as a different kind of politician.”

I understand how you feel. But the decision is not absolutely final until she says it is publicly. And there are good reasons to delay, as I point out. It is not a tease.

Reagan waited a long time in 1978-9, saying the same thing as Sarah. He had a chief of staff, as she does. His surrogates were laying the groundwork, as hers are. His delay was not a tease either. He knew he would be outspent by the same Establishment that hated him and now hates Palin. To take on the Establishment and beat them, you cannot fight them on terms they dictate. That is just a fact.

I want to win. I know you do too. To win, you have to be willing to wait and strike at the best time. (Think of Lee at Gettysburg. He was in a hurry for his battle of decision and he forced it and wound up losing the war.)


53 posted on 08/14/2011 12:52:34 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
Sarah Palin has a date with destiny, your jealousy of her to the contrary notwithstanding.

She is already somebody BIG and SPECIAL in the eyes of a huge number of Americans.

No other Republican is even in the same league with her stunning popularity and charisma.

She is a stadium-filling phenomenon.

That is why she is so hated and feared by the left.

She is going to pull off the greatest underdog victory by a woman since Elizabeth I defied overwhelming odds to preside over the defeat of King Phillip II's Spanish Armada, in 1588.

It was said of Elizabeth I she had abiding faith in her people and they, in turn, completely believed in her.

I was born far too late to witness that victory but am grateful to be alive to watch the historic great fortune about to shine on another rare woman of world history who will triumphantly lead her people out of darkness, with love and grace.

54 posted on 08/14/2011 12:53:33 PM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority (Where is the middle ground on insolvency of the United States government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Sarah doesn’t have to *go at* bachmann, rollins is killing her. The underhanded rumor and inuendo backstabbing campaign that is being conducted by bachmann against Palin will only hurt her, and it shows that she has no loyalty or core principles to stand on.
If Sarah Palin had not endorsed her in her last election, campaigned for her, brought in donations and donated to her from her own PAC. bachmann would have lost that race.
THen SHE decides she is THE TEA Party leader. I didn’t vote for her to be my leader. Did you?
Anyone who thinks that rollins first leap in public as bachmann’s campaign manager against Palin was a fluke not completely condoned by bachmann, think agsin.
Here is something to ponder. bachmann says that she and Palin are good friends. Well, if that is so, why did she not bother to even say hello to her in Iowa? I mean, friends can compete. I have. Some days you get the bear, other days, the bear gets you. That doesn’t make my competitor any less my friend. MB could have actually helped herself politically by welcoming her *friend* to Iowa to the fair. That’s what I would have done.
I mean, picture it. A smiling, friendly Michelle Bachmann and a smiling Palin at the same place LOOKING like friends. Who do you think that would have helped more?
Instead, she showed up thirty minutes late clearly perturbed, spoke for three minutes, and ran away. Titanium spine and all.
rollins has her backtracking on her own previous statements and talking in soundbites. It is becoming so repetitive you could recite it yourself.
It will get old. Fast.


55 posted on 08/14/2011 12:54:35 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Mama always told me if you cain't say something nice/use duct tape. Ever try to ducttape a keyboard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I pray you are correct!

There Is Only One!


56 posted on 08/14/2011 12:54:42 PM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
"I like her a lot but..."

You could have stopped right there. Anything you could possibly write after that:

1). We've already heard... and discounted... between one-thousand and ten-thousand times.

2). Will not be taken seriously, as that lead-in automatically and indelibly defines you.

3). It doesn't matter if you really mean what you say next, it makes the 87% of FReepers who support Palin not want to waste their time reading it.

There is a miniscule and insignificant percentage who will eagerly read on, hoping for some new nugget, some fresh ammo to use when tilting at their imagined Palin windmill, but even they will be disappointed, because every negative thing that could be said about Sarah, as well as every negative thing that could never be said of her, have already been said a gajillion times over the past third of a decade.

I really wanted to read what you had to say, but...

;^\

57 posted on 08/14/2011 12:57:51 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Large coffee, light with one sugar... hold the pickle, darlin'...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Full disclosure, Al. You jogged my memory on a lot of this the other day, as you frequently do, so you deserve a huge hat tip.

How do you find these Reagan clips? Unbelievable. Your scholarship on all things Reagan amazes me.


58 posted on 08/14/2011 12:58:39 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Don’t forget the TransTexas Corridor.


59 posted on 08/14/2011 1:00:49 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal (Palin Power 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
"Sarah is first a business woman."

Blind and deaf much?

Palin is, first, a Christian, then a Mom, then a Patriot. "Business woman" is so far down her list that it doesn't bear mentioning in a discussion about what defines or motivates her. You're either blind, deceitful, or stupid. Possibly all of the above.

Nice.

;^\

60 posted on 08/14/2011 1:03:32 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Large coffee, light with one sugar... hold the pickle, darlin'...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson