Posted on 08/13/2011 1:26:27 PM PDT by JimWayne
After yesterday's spurt in talk radio about Ron Paul, I've been thinking about his positions. I oppose Ron Paul on Foreign Policy (especially his position ignoring the threat of Islam taking over our policy), but have to seriously wonder about supporting some of the other candidates who have not faced opposition.
Ron Paul gets a lot of flak, but why do the others get away with cheating us for doing far worse than what Ron Paul promises to do to Israel? Many candidates like Rick Santorum, George Allen and Joe Barton have hijacked the label of conservative, but are less conservative than even Ron Paul. They support raising debt to infinite levels, deficit funding, support for Islamic regimes like Pakistan, nationalized healthcare (they did not oppose Romneycare), have wishy-washy positions on abortion, and say one thing during the elections while ganging up with the liberals right after the elections.
The second thought in my mind is about Israel. Why are we so obsessed about Israel when the Jewish people seem to vote for the RATs? I think Islam is more dangerous and if we pull the aid from both Palestine and Israel, Israel will win, but this is a situation I don't really feel strongly about. There are much bigger problems at home and my wealth is depleting not merely due to Obama and other Dims, but the RINOs and neocons who have ganged up with the liberals over the years.
These RINOs do not support us but expect our support unconditionally. They even opposed the TEA Party candidates but suddenly claim that they themselves are part of the TEA Party.
So my question to you is why should we give a free pass to the RINOs? Shouldn't we hold them to the same standards we hold Ron Paul to? I can already hear that Ron Paul is a kook, but that is not the question. The question is whether others like Santorum and George Allen aren't worse than being a kook and why should we support them? The other question is why Israel is so important that my savings should be used for them. Shouldn't they take care of themselves?
Jim Wayne, you are the one supporting global warming by posting your idiotic vanity supporting Ron Paul, then claiming that you don't support Ron Paul. My first post was in response to your vanity comment that you oppose U.S. aid to Israel, a classic Ron Paul anti-Semitic position. You've tried to throw all sorts of false accusations my way because I pointed out what you obviously are. You just posted your vanity to stir things up. Ho-hum.
Believe me, you prove yourself to be illogical when you repeatedly insist that whenever A questions group B's behavior, it automatically proves beyond all reasonable doubt that A is an accomplice of C because C opposes issue D supported by group B. You probably have a degree that does not require logic (say, political science or Gender Studies). You are too stupid to understand the lack of logic in the above conclusion.
Anyway, the topic is that Rick Santorum is a proven supporter of Global Warming and homosexuality and anyone who supports him is also a supporter of homosexuality and Global Warming.
Now I see why you were foaming at the mouth and made accusations against me for using Ron Paul as some sort of a negative benchmark and trashing RINOs as being below this negative benchmark.
Do you remember this post you made?
And this?
Go away, little girl. You’re just a run-of-the-mill stalker, besides being a nutcase of course.
Go away from FR, you Romney supporting liberal. I hope you know that conservatives on FR oppose Mitt Romney and his baby-killing policies. You are a blot on America for supporting baby-killer Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.