Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

I’m not sure how to feel about this. On the surface, it almost seems like a good idea. I’d like to see more details, before I pass judgement. I don’t agree with much this administration does, but I’m not going to knee jerk this one. It has the potential to mitigate some of the loss to the taxpayers on those properties. I’m not saying they shouldn’t still try to sell them off, but while the process of being sold is going on, rent em out. What I’m afraid of with this bunch is the access to these properties go to those who would basically destroy the value of them, and potentially ruin the value of the surrounding properties.


13 posted on 08/10/2011 11:31:14 AM PDT by Carolina_Thor (It's always better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carolina_Thor

For results of this decision, five years hence, see London news, today....................


19 posted on 08/10/2011 11:39:07 AM PDT by Red Badger ("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Carolina_Thor

Can’t believe you would say that, what do you think happens to landlords when their rents are depressed due to oversupply in the Rental markets?

They go into foreclosure too. Then the government will have to bail them out too.


22 posted on 08/10/2011 11:42:04 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Carolina_Thor

What makes you think that they will pay their rent? And if they don’t who is going to pursue them? Certainly not the Democrat bureaucrats. They need the votes and this is the purpose of the insane plan. Fertilize the weeds and ignore the crop and then expect to make a harvest. This is the insane part.


26 posted on 08/10/2011 11:50:57 AM PDT by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Carolina_Thor

Your naivete is showing.

Bleeding heart liberals will see this as an opportunity to house the homeless, section 8, those who can least afford it...

Just a few months ago FReepers were kidding that this would happen....


81 posted on 08/11/2011 3:26:36 AM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Carolina_Thor

Oh and let’s not forget the rundown condition the previous owners left these homes in. That will require government funds to bring them up to code.

Oh and ....will that make for the absentee landlord? Or worse some more government workers managing the property with nearly impossible regulations for evictions?


82 posted on 08/11/2011 3:29:39 AM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Carolina_Thor
The problem is that once a bureaucracy is created to administer these rental properties, there will be no incentive to sell them, along with a huge number of newly created dependents who want the govt. to continue to be their landlord, at very attractive rents.

And the result?

A new group of people who will reliably vote Democrat, because it will be “evil Republicans” who will insist that Fannie and Freddie sell the properties. And a huge new socialized sector of the economy in what had once been a “free market.”

ACORN would be pleased.

87 posted on 08/11/2011 11:52:28 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson