“...Didn’t Great Britain disarm their police force?...”
No, Great Britain’s POLICE FORCE disarmed their own Citiz..err, SUBJECTS.
And this is what happens.
Ya gets what ya settles for. And they’re getting what they settled for right now.
Hey Brits:
This is your reward for letting your government disarm you. All you “law-abiding” British SUBJECTS are now at the mercy of the thugs. Your property smashed and stolen, your lives and your families, well, you can’t even protect them anymore.
But don’t worry. Your “government” will protect you....maybe...as long as the thugs aren’t of the protected professional victim class.
Bet it sucks to be a Brit right about now.
Bright, shining crystal-clear example of why we should NEVER submit to being disarmed. By any means necessary, resist it.
First point, British police haven’t been disarmed - they were never armed in the first place and constantly vote against being armed.
Second point, the British populace were never particularly armed in the first place, especially not in the cities. Historically speaking the only people who have guns in this country for the last 200 years have been farmers
Third point, only certain weapons have been banned. Handguns were banned in 1997 and only 100,000 were destroyed. That means that either a lot of people didn’t hand in their guns, or that only a tiny percentage of handguns were owned in the first place.
Fourth point, shotguns are still legal and i’ve got one.
Fifth point, stop talking nonsense about something you know little about.
British people havent been ‘subjects’ for many years now.
And no it dosent suck, because 99.99% of the UK isnt alight or under attack. Britain will survive this, its survived much worse.