Posted on 08/08/2011 6:44:54 PM PDT by Hawk720
Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has welcomed her second grandchild, Radar Online reported Monday.
Palin's son, Track, and his new wife Britta (nee Hanson) became parents over the weekend to a baby girl, name Kyla Grace.
Track, 22, married his 21-year-old high-school sweetheart in May in a small ceremony in Hatcher Pass, Alaska.
(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxny.com ...
What crap.
I know, huh?! I mean, those people have sex!!!! How barbaric. LMAO!
;^\
I can only assume that you believe the opposite. Can you elaborate?
did you have sex before marriage since you seems to think newzjunky remark was so appropriate... I’m really tired of the ‘bash the Palin Family’ wake up America..we have serious problems in this Nation..
Intelligent discussion will be all but impossible in 10-15 years, tops.
It is common courtesy in the forum to ping someone when you are mentioning them ... even when you are calling them names. I’m sure it was an unintentional slight.
That should tell you something about how you appear to others.
Hahaha - I started to comment on the same thing!
We've come a long way from this thread, back in 2004:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1088088/posts
As I said in an earlier post: The war is over. We lost.
Imagine all the loving arms in that family, embracing baby Kyla, nurturing her with muchas smooches. We should all be so lucky. What a wonderful clan.
My first child came after 11 years of marriage, via adoption, that sure put the family gossips to sleep...my second came by birth after 14 years of marriage!!!! and our 50th anniversary was in June...such boring conservative Republicans this family is... I look forward to this new Palin addition running all over the White House lawns playing and having fun...may there be many more...
Track is an adult.....what is Sarah and Todd supposed to due, put a chastity belt on him???
Sexual desire is on the greatest human weaknesses and most succumb to it prior to marriage. I’m not justifying it, just saying it’s a tough thing to fight off. Christ even said any who looks upon a woman with lust has committed adultry with her in his heart. Pretty tough standards.
We are weak and sinners by nature. That’s why God gave us Jesus Christ, so he can absolve us of our sins if we accept his as our Savior.
I’m sure Track is a fine young man. He’s been with this girl since high school and he did the right thing and married her. He’s far more a man than Levi Johnston.
Did you trash Reagan?
I believe Patti Davis was born in October 1952. Reagan had married in March of '52.
Who in their right mind gives a flying fig what liberals think.
Unbelievable.
I was 12 when Reagan was elected.
And I haven’t trashed any presidential candidates child. She’s not a candidate!
Yikes!
Very reasonable posts, and I don’t know why you got flamed. Maybe the stress of the next election is already affecting people.
Not me. I’m a conservative, but going after kids of pols is just not something I’m into. Besides, family values are aspirational, something we always try for, even if we don’t always succeed. Sexual purity is difficult. Even Jesus said you can’t claim purity if you have so much as a lustful thought. I’m betting every poster critiquing the younger Palins in this thread is a flat out hypocrite when measured against that standard. The reason we hold up the flag of family values is not to claim perfection, but to encourage good living. That Jesus sets the standard so high should encourage us to be gentle with those who falter, because God looks at the heart, and probably doesn’t see much of a difference between us.
Do you consider Hindu or Buddhist marriages valid before God?
If so, are there any religions you don't consider valid before God?
Are there any Christian sects you don't consider valid before God?
If you reply "no" to any of these questions, then should people belonging to those religions or sects you have negatively judged ever have sex, since they will never be "truly" married before God - even though they may have consecrated their lives and relationships to God in their own ways, and be surrounded by millions of other who have believed the same way for hundreds or thousands of years?
Or doesn't it matter whether the damned heathens rut, since they're all going to hell anyway?
I was 12 when Reagan was elected. And I haven’t trashed any presidential candidates child. She’s not a candidate! Yikes!
Sheesh!
You attempt to avoid my point by using technicalities that don't make a dimes worth of difference.
So what that you were 12 years old when Reagan was elected and so what that Palin is a potential candidate and not a definite candidate at this point in time.
The point remains.
Do you trash Reagan now that you are a "growup" because of when Patti Davis' was born?
Listen, dingelheimer, I didn’t say or infer anything from a religious perspective. I belong to no organized religion, and I’m not a Christian. I simply pointed out that sex before marriage is not a good idea. You know perfectly well what social pathologies it produces, as does everyone else here who is willing to surrender his philsophies and values to providing a pass for the Palins.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.