Believe it or not, I saw one of those things at sea, we were returning from Subic in 63 or 64, We must have been near Catalina, Can't remember for sure, but I remember thinking those people are insane.
Posted on 08/08/2011 8:39:30 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
Jacqueline Kennedy-Onassis believed Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was behind the assassination of her husband, according to tapes recorded by the former first lady just months after President John F. Kennedy's death, the Daily Mail reports.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
A woman marked by her one talent which was to latch on to rich men.
Great photo. The Kennedys are scum but JFK obviously is showing some common sense and restraint in the photo.
I always thought it was LBJ. He was the greediest man alive. He got insanely richer off of the Vietnam War. Johnson Fence Company, Brown & Root and all the defense contractors in TX. He got a piece of anything that moved in TX. He was a shareholder in loads of TX companies.
He left office the 2nd wealthiest President. Geo Washington was a billionaire (inflation adjusted) because of his land holdings.
Nixon left office broke. He never made a dime of LBJ/JFK’s Vietnam War.
The same thing is going on today. Muslim in office - 6 meaningless wars with no goal, end game or anything. Just kids dying due to leaked intel by islamic moles in the US govt. War is just a business now.
No it is not. Use your brain and follow the money. Who benefited? Who got insanely richer of Vietnam? Who cooked up The Gulf of Tonkin? Who’s fence company had a contract for every fence at a US base in SE Asia during Vietnam? Who was a major sharholder in Brown & Root?
It was LBJ. No conspiracy theory just who benefitted the most and got insanely richer off the war.
Good analysis, but you left out ol’ J. Edgar Hoover’s part.
Most of the cops in Dallas knew the word on the street was that Kennedy was going to get killed.
Hardly. He had means, motive and opportunity.
Any explanation that excludes him adds several layers of complexity to the conspiracy theory - which is desirable from the perspective of the conspiracy theorist, not the logician.
It was also LBJ that convinced Kennedy not to use the bullet proof bubble on the convertable that day
I never equated JFK with LBJ's level of corruption and dishonesty. Kennedy was morally bankrupt and in way over his head for the job. That is also what the Commies thought when they tried to pull the Cuba Missal installations. LBJ was actively involved in every aspect his getting ahead and staying there. I generally don't subscribe to conspiracies, but I give Jackie O a pass for genuinely believing LBJ was involved in this. It seems probable knowing the type of human debris LBJ was.
Believe it or not, I saw one of those things at sea, we were returning from Subic in 63 or 64, We must have been near Catalina, Can't remember for sure, but I remember thinking those people are insane.
I’m not sure that it’s all that difficult to understand. From a very basic position, it’s just another sin and fallen degenerate mankind is born in sin....therefore no surprise that unregenerate people do what comes naturally to them in that state, they sin. There is one basic aspect to affairs though that rarely gets talked about.... while affairs sometimes happen when there is an ongoing sexual relationship between the husband and the wife, I would bet that it much more frequently occurs when that relationship has come unraveled. Always being available sexually to your spouse is a commandment from God.... and if one doesn’t carry out that duty, they are disobeying God’s commandments. Since there is no weight given in scripture (that I’m aware of) concerning the gravity of a sin, this means that the one who has withheld sex from his/her spouse is as guilty of sin as the one who had the affair. You asked “who can explain why men have affairs” but you could just as easily have asked “how can any person withhold a sexual response to their husband or wife”?
Logically in order for Oswald to be the shooter he needed to be able to make the shots. That is not a reasonable proposition.
Explain your logic.
Don’t forget Pacific Architects & Engineers reputedly owned by Lady Bird...
You are correct: NEWwoman's story is simply not believable.
The inauguration of LBJ was photographed, but not filmed. It was sound recorded as well.
At the time it occurred, all the TV networks were breaking the official news that President Kennedy had succumbed to his injuries.
Far from being broadcast live, it was only made known after the fact and there is no footage.
There were only ten men present at the inauguration besides LBJ.
Other than having been physically present, there is no way to tell what look was in LBJ's eyes, since he is blinking in the only extant photograph of the swearing-in and his eyes are not visible.
Military records indicate that Oswald was not a talented marksman, in fact he did quite poorly using a far superior rifle (m1 garand) to that of the carcano he is purported to have used during the assassination.
You might also recall that a lone teenager with no source of income stalked George Wallace until an opportunity to shoot him arose. George announced his run for President in Texas.
According to his Marine Corps records he was twice rated as a sharpshooter.
If it is unreasonable that a Marine Corps-trained sharpshooter, on a clear and sunny day, got off two out of three good (from his perspective) shots - well then, nothing is reasonable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.