Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MinuteGal

“He flatly stated that these helicopters were “sitting ducks”, they were used to haul freight and such during Nam....and they would NEVER be sent on a combat mission except in emergency.”

He’s very, very WRONG.

MH-47G
MH-47G Chinook, during the aircraft’s rollout ceremony 6 May 2007 at Boeing

The MH-47G Special Operations Aviation (SOA) version is currently being delivered to the US Army. It is similar to the MH-47E, but features a more sophisticated avionics including a digital Common Avionics Architecture System (CAAS). The CAAS is common glass cockpit used by different helicopters such as MH-60K/Ls, CH-53E/Ks, and ARH-70As.[59] The MH-47G will also incorporate all of the new sections of the CH-47F.[60]

Based on operational experience in Afghanistan, the CH-47 was found to be an effective substitute for the UH-60 Black Hawk as an assault helicopter. With its larger payload, range, and higher operating speed, one Chinook can replace up to five UH-60s in this role as an air assault transport.[61]

The new modernization program will improve MH-47D and MH-47E Special Operations Chinooks to the MH-47G design specs. A total of 25 MH-47E and 11 MH-47D aircraft were upgraded by the end of 2003. In 2002 the army announced plans to expand the Special Operations Aviation Regiment. The expansion would add 12 additional MH-47G helicopters.[62] On February 10, 2011, Leaders and employees from the H-47 program gathered for a ceremony at Boeing’s helicopter facility in Ridley Township, PA., to commemorate the delivery of the final MH-47G Chinook to U.S. Army Special Operations Command.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CH-47_Chinook


294 posted on 08/06/2011 12:37:48 PM PDT by ScreamingFist (Quiet the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: ScreamingFist
He’s very, very WRONG.

Actually, he isn't. His description of the A-model Chinook in Vietnam is pretty accurate.

The problem is that the Chinook that's in-service now isn't the same Chinook that was in service 40 years ago. Today's Chinook is a classic case of an old battleax where the handle's been replaced four times and the head/blade six times. Although it looks pretty similar, it's NOT the same aircraft in terms of capabilities.
301 posted on 08/06/2011 12:43:39 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

To: ScreamingFist; tanknetter
"He's very, very WRONG!"

Sorry, I'll stick with what the Nam veteran helicopter pilot stated. He was there in the thick of combat and should know what he's talking about.

Remember, it was 4 decades ago....and I'm sure the helicopters of that era were not the same as those utilized today.

Leni

305 posted on 08/06/2011 12:52:16 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Too Bad Those of Us who Work for a Living Have to Support Those who Vote for a Living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson