To: Clairity
I would consider it lucky not to live till 100.
6 posted on
08/05/2011 7:21:33 PM PDT by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: CaptainK
It all depends on the quality of life — some people are still active in the 90-100 age range.
7 posted on
08/05/2011 7:24:18 PM PDT by
Clairity
("The United States needs to be not so much loved as it needs to be respected." -- VP Dick Cheney)
To: CaptainK
99 would satisfy me if I had all of my mental acuity and was fully ambulatory.
21 posted on
08/05/2011 8:08:31 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: CaptainK; Graybeard58
Wifey and I (both age 64,and happily suckling on SSA) wake up most mornings thanking the Lord that we aren't 40 - or even 20 - years younger.
There's a rather grim future for our former USA.....glad we won't see all of the downfall; just enough, apparently, to keep us in totally pissed-off mode.
29 posted on
08/05/2011 8:27:58 PM PDT by
ErnBatavia
(It's not the Obama Administration....it's the "Obama Regime".)
To: CaptainK
Exactly. Unless I have a boatload of money to take care of myself financially and I can get around and take care of myself, I don’t want to live that long.
30 posted on
08/05/2011 8:30:22 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
To: CaptainK
I am with you on that...I never understood the idea of living to be 100 as a worthy cause. Scripture says man’s life span is 3 score and 10. After that if they live longer its because they are strong and those years are filled with sorrow/
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson