Posted on 08/03/2011 6:40:33 PM PDT by Kaslin
Libertarians don’t win elections. I realize that Ron Paul has tried to hide his libertarian proclivities on things like open borders for the past few years but he doesn’t fool most of us.
If Paul were to run as an independent, it would only because he wants Obama to win. He is way too smart to think a third party candidate has a shot at the job.
Or, the Republican front runner could promise Ron Paul a job that would allow him to make congressional democrat’s lives a nightmare.
This possibility has occurred to me several times in the last few weeks. I really hope nobody (libertarians, Tea Party or anybody else) tries to run as third party and split the vote. That will guarantee that Obama will get back in.
Ron Paul and the libertarians are a threat, but I think that Obama’s advisers are going to try to focus on the dissatisfaction of the Tea Partiers and peel them off. Judging by some of the rhetoric here in the last couple of weeks, that would be very easy to do.
I am voting for the best pro-freedom, pro-Constitution candidate in 2012.
Whether that candidate is a Republican or not matters not one whit to me.
I would make him treasurer.
Or, the Republican front runner could promise Ron Paul a job that would allow him to make congressional democrat’s lives a nightmare.
**************************
I like the way you think.
Bad idea - Ron Paul might steal more votes from Obama than he would from any potential republican president. I’m not saying that to bash Paul in any way, but Obama has abandoned the anti-war crowd and that’s where Paul got a lot of his support last time around. Also, the libertarian idea that the government is too big AND should stay out of peoples lives has some potential cross-over appeal for social liberals, since most politicians only support one or the other. He could really clean up among moderates and independents, which Obama can’t afford.
Don’t tell a soul, but I thought yesterday, or the day before, that things are so collapsed already that no matter who is elected we can not recover, and that thought led to Ron Paul! But for the death of us all facing a third party, God only knows how many might give the election to Obama by way of a third party.
If Paul ran as a third party he would also pull some of the anti-war crowd away from Obama. Obama has failed them miserably.
I wish the GOP had the guts to nominate Ron Paul.
I’m not worried about Ron Paul running as a third party candidate in 2012. He didn’t in 2008 when the candidate was McCain.
The guy I worry about is Donald Trump. He’s the Perot factor in that race. And Trump’s ego may cause him to do it.
The Libertarian Party heads (the business apparatus behind the party) won’t have him back after what happened in 88. He would have to run on the Constitution Party or other ticket if he goes third party.
“I think that Obama’s advisers are going to try to focus on the dissatisfaction of the Tea Partiers and peel them off. Judging by some of the rhetoric here in the last couple of weeks, that would be very easy to do.”
Discouraging the opposition is a time tested method of securing electoral victory. That said, Obama is doing his part to discourage his own party as well, so it may balance out in the end. I believe (and hope) most Tea Party members will not give up, especially after the progress that’s been made. It will always be an uphill battle, but a worthy one.
Set him up in Treasury with the mission of disemboweling BATF
I would make him Budget Director. Far more powerful that Sec'y of the Treasury.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.