Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner Press Conference any moment now
http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/cvplive/cvpstream1 ^ | cnn

Posted on 07/28/2011 10:55:28 AM PDT by RummyChick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 next last
To: chris37

Yep! Got Duke Nukem Forever last week so I will continue to kill martians in Las Vegas. Probably accomplish much more than our representatives.


121 posted on 07/28/2011 12:58:21 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Owen
What emerges from the Senate will be much closer to Boehner than what Reid’s plan currently is.

My I wish I could foretell the future like you can.

122 posted on 07/28/2011 1:09:29 PM PDT by McGruff (I'm with the Tea Party, not the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: vg0va3

WHOOT!

Long time battlefield vet here...since BF 1942 :DD


123 posted on 07/28/2011 1:20:28 PM PDT by chris37 (representative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
Yes. JYO.

And IMO, wrong.

Not the place for this discussion, but the things you listed reflect different opinions and not a lack of concern for the country he loves.

It's important to make that distinction, even when discussing politics among fellow conservatives. Political views shouldn't trump actual character assessment. Ever.

124 posted on 07/28/2011 1:24:00 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
The Republicans, again, have been briar patched. All the Dems want is to be able to spend more money without restraint. Boehner is handing that to them.
125 posted on 07/28/2011 1:24:59 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
"I wonder how tea partiers would feel about this for starters.... Repeal the 1943 Current Payment Tax Act..."

Heck yeah. A large part of our problem is that people don't know what they're paying in taxes. In fact, come April 15, you'll hear all sorts of folks saying "I'm not paying anything this year, in fact I'm getting something back!" Idiots all.

Withholding was a huge enabler for the socialist machine.
126 posted on 07/28/2011 2:01:50 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: casinva

Whatever happens on the bill is less important than who wins the spin. Neither side has the power to pass what they want.


127 posted on 07/28/2011 2:03:57 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kcvl; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Lady Jag; PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP; FARS; justiceseeker93; ...

128 posted on 07/28/2011 2:13:36 PM PDT by potlatch (They that sow the wind shall reap the whirlwind......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: casinva

I don’t understand how it remains Boehner’s bill after Reid has marked it up. Certainly if it went back to the house with tax increases it could no longer be called Boehner’s bill.


129 posted on 07/28/2011 2:16:01 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: altura

I am going to ask you a question. This is not a sarcastic question. It is made to make you think.

Let’s say Boehner’s bill cuts 50 Billion in 2012.It is actually lower than that but lets just use 50 billion as a figure.

Let’s say Boehner’s bill let’s Obama raise the debt ceiling 1 TRILLION dollars right now.

Is that enough of a spending cut for you???????????????????

Yes or no.

Because, those men you say you respect cannot force any future Congress to make those cuts.
It is against the law.

And if they haven’t made those cuts now..what makes you think they will in the future???

Listen to this rap song.

Remy: Raise The Debt Ceiling Rap
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoS52fVtVQM

Do you really really think THIS congress will do the right thing in the future if they wouldn’t do it now?


130 posted on 07/28/2011 2:26:09 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

LOL! Did you notice the day after Obama said “Eat your peas.” Google helped him out by making their Google image all out of peas in pods.


131 posted on 07/28/2011 2:39:32 PM PDT by Spunky (“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

If I understand it all (and please someone feel free to correct me if needed), I believe the Senate could edit the Boehner bill, heck even gut it almost completely with just something small still intact, and so long as it got voted in, they could then send it back with it still being considered the Boehner bill since that was the foundation of which they had to work with. Reid would say he’s “incorporating” some changes into it. It would have Boehner’s name on it.

Now while that bill might not represent Boehner’s bill at all, and I believe the House has the right to reject it, he’s still rejecting something with his name attached to it, and the Dems will have a public relations hey day with that. “Well,” I can hear them saying, “The Republicans can’t even accept their own leader’s bill now!”

Kind of like a buyer who puts an offer on paper to buy a house. The seller gets the offer in writing then changes the price, adds additional downpayment amount, deletes any concessions like a carpeting allowance, and scratches off the part asking for some closing cost assistance, and then hands it back. While the offer is not the same, the paper it was written on is.


132 posted on 07/28/2011 2:40:23 PM PDT by casinva (We are being held hostage by Democrat US Senators who block votes just like the ones in Wisconsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

great point. It is pure smoke and mirrors.


133 posted on 07/28/2011 2:40:44 PM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
EVOLUTION OF FEDERAL INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING: THE MACHINERY OF INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE

A national effort needs to start to starve the beast.

134 posted on 07/28/2011 2:43:17 PM PDT by mewzilla (Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And I'll throw this in for anyone who missed it...

Baseline Budgeting Makes Real Cuts Impossible in Washington

135 posted on 07/28/2011 2:45:19 PM PDT by mewzilla (Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Yeah, I did! They put up some cute images, except for omitting important patriotic ones sometimes.


136 posted on 07/28/2011 2:49:15 PM PDT by potlatch (They that sow the wind shall reap the whirlwind......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: casinva
"Kind of like a buyer who puts an offer on paper to buy a house. The seller gets the offer in writing then changes the price, adds additional downpayment amount, deletes any concessions like a carpeting allowance, and scratches off the part asking for some closing cost assistance, and then hands it back. While the offer is not the same, the paper it was written on is."

I don't know if that could ever be done, but I do know not to ever accept an offer and then back out. Because if you do the Realtor that brought the buyer still gets his commission. I know of a person who did that and the seller even went to court thinking he had the right to back out and he lost and the Realtor got a whopping $40,000 commission anyway.

137 posted on 07/28/2011 2:54:38 PM PDT by Spunky (“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: casinva

Yes they would certainly attempt to tar Boehner with refusing to support “his own” bill, but that would be so transparently disingenuous that I don’t think that even the most dense mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging non-voter would fall for it.


138 posted on 07/28/2011 2:55:46 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne
Whatever happens on the bill is less important than who wins the spin. Neither side has the power to pass what they want.

If the GOP doesn't pass something in the House, it will be a lot easier for Obama to blame the pending higher interest rates on them.

Yes, I know that the real problem is spending, but it appears politically impossible to do much about that while the Dems have the senate and presidency.

139 posted on 07/28/2011 2:59:46 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Budget sins can be fixed. Amnesty is irreversible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Hey, the most dense mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging non-voters believed in “Hope and Change” too though. LOL


140 posted on 07/28/2011 3:00:33 PM PDT by casinva (We are being held hostage by Democrat US Senators who block votes just like the ones in Wisconsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson