Posted on 07/27/2011 6:54:41 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
Chris Tatum smokes on the front porch of his Wheatley Courts apartment. Tatum said he tries to avoid smoking inside the apartment, around his stepchildren. Under the prohibition, he wouldnt even be allowed to smoke there. Photo: Bob Owen/rowen@express-news.net / rowen@express-news.net
What can possibly go wrong?
First they came for the druggies, and you cheered because, well, they’re *druggies* and don’t need no steenkin’ rights anyway....
Then they came for the smokers, and you cheered, because smoking is just icky....
Then they came for the fatties, and you cheered, because who really wants to look at all those fat people??
You’re next - cheer about that....
I don't care if this is public housing. It's still their castle! (paid for by us) What a bunch of BS!
Tobacco yes, but they won’t stop the crack smoking in the buildings.
He who pays the piper calls the tune.
Just clarifying...
LOL! A LARGE majority! of the 200 people who responded! 162 people out of a survey sent to 6,209 households.
As a smoker I oppose any smoking bans, but, this is NOT their own home. It is PUBLIC housing, government owned. You want to do what you want in YOUR house, get off the government tit and buy your own house.
/rant off
First they came for the druggies, and you cheered because, well, it was a druggie that stuck a gun in my face and stole my wallet.
“Then they came for the smokers, and you cheered, because smoking killed both of my grandparents.
“Then they came for the fatties, and you cheered, because who really wants to look at all those fat people??”
Please. No one is coming for the fatties. They’re hard to kidnap.
I don’t care if this is public housing. It’s still their castle! (paid for by us) What a bunch of BS!
________________________________________
Don’t contradict yourself. If you and I pay for their “castle”, then you don’t think we have a say in what goes on there?
Oh yes, let's see some inspector telling the local MS 13 gang bangers to stop smoking. Exchanging gun smoke for tobacco smoke if they are lucky. A machete might also be used.
Gangbangers and illegals won’t be affected by this at all.
Dependency is slavery.
He who pays the piper calls the tune.
I’m all for it, the reason being private property rights. The housing authority owns it, they can do as they wish.
I’m all for making the dependent life “not so comfortable”,
so that, perhaps, these folks would look for a better way to live.
I lived for a while in an apartment above a man who it turns out was going through a divorce. He would sit for hours right under my bedroom chain smoking. I couldn't even go into that room. My entire apartment smelled like an ashtray and I had to seal the bedroom off with tape.
You will probably suggest that I should have opened the windows. Right. Chimney effect. Worse.
It's still their castle!
If they want a castle let them go out and get a job and pay for it. I don't want to pay for their castle.
If they’re on public assistance, they don’t need to be spending taxpayer money on smokes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.