Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAHA (San Antonio Housing Authority) to ban smoking in public housing
San Antonio Express News ^ | 07/27/2011 | Karisa King

Posted on 07/27/2011 6:54:41 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
Chris Tatum smokes on the front porch of his Wheatley Courts apartment. Tatum said he tries to avoid smoking inside the apartment, around his stepchildren. Under the prohibition, he wouldn’t even be allowed to smoke there. Photo: Bob Owen/rowen@express-news.net / rowen@express-news.net

Chris Tatum smokes on the front porch of his Wheatley Courts apartment. Tatum said he tries to avoid smoking inside the apartment, around his stepchildren. Under the prohibition, he wouldn’t even be allowed to smoke there. Photo: Bob Owen/rowen@express-news.net / rowen@express-news.net



Norma Garcia, who lives in the Wheatley Courts, smokes in front of her apartment. Photo: Bob Owen/rowen@express-news.net / rowen@express-news.net

Norma Garcia, who lives in the Wheatley Courts, smokes in front of her apartment. Photo: Bob Owen/rowen@express-news.net / rowen@express-news.net


Norma Garcia, who lives in the Wheatley Courts, smokes in front of her apartment. Photo: Bob Owen/rowen@express-news.net / rowen@express-news.net

Norma Garcia, who lives in the Wheatley Courts, smokes in front of her apartment. Photo: Bob Owen/rowen@express-news.net / rowen@express-news.net



1 posted on 07/27/2011 6:54:46 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

What can possibly go wrong?


2 posted on 07/27/2011 6:56:02 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

3 posted on 07/27/2011 6:57:43 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (The views and opinions expressed in this post are true and correct. Deal with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

First they came for the druggies, and you cheered because, well, they’re *druggies* and don’t need no steenkin’ rights anyway....

Then they came for the smokers, and you cheered, because smoking is just icky....

Then they came for the fatties, and you cheered, because who really wants to look at all those fat people??

You’re next - cheer about that....


4 posted on 07/27/2011 7:00:05 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
So, you can't smoke in the apartment and, as I understand it, not outside your apartment. You MUST go to a designated smoking area!

I don't care if this is public housing. It's still their castle! (paid for by us) What a bunch of BS!

5 posted on 07/27/2011 7:00:05 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Tobacco yes, but they won’t stop the crack smoking in the buildings.


6 posted on 07/27/2011 7:01:00 AM PDT by Mrs.Z
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

He who pays the piper calls the tune.


7 posted on 07/27/2011 7:02:42 AM PDT by Grunthor (Faster than the speed of smell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Z
Tobacco (legal) yes, but they won’t stop the crack (illegal) smoking in the buildings.

Just clarifying...

8 posted on 07/27/2011 7:03:03 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
A survey sent to all 6,029 households in January shows that a large majority of tenants support the no-smoking policy. Of the 200 residents who responded, 81 percent said they liked the idea, while 17 percent opposed it, and 2 percent said they had no opinion.

LOL! A LARGE majority! of the 200 people who responded! 162 people out of a survey sent to 6,209 households.

9 posted on 07/27/2011 7:04:21 AM PDT by TaxPayer2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
....public housing residents in San Antonio soon will add one more: their own homes

As a smoker I oppose any smoking bans, but, this is NOT their own home. It is PUBLIC housing, government owned. You want to do what you want in YOUR house, get off the government tit and buy your own house.

/rant off

10 posted on 07/27/2011 7:06:22 AM PDT by Envisioning ( Call me a racist................, one more time......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

First they came for the druggies, and you cheered because, well, it was a druggie that stuck a gun in my face and stole my wallet.

“Then they came for the smokers, and you cheered, because smoking killed both of my grandparents.

“Then they came for the fatties, and you cheered, because who really wants to look at all those fat people??”

Please. No one is coming for the fatties. They’re hard to kidnap.


11 posted on 07/27/2011 7:06:28 AM PDT by Grunthor (Faster than the speed of smell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

I don’t care if this is public housing. It’s still their castle! (paid for by us) What a bunch of BS!

________________________________________

Don’t contradict yourself. If you and I pay for their “castle”, then you don’t think we have a say in what goes on there?


12 posted on 07/27/2011 7:06:30 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (The views and opinions expressed in this post are true and correct. Deal with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
"What can possibly go wrong"

Oh yes, let's see some inspector telling the local MS 13 gang bangers to stop smoking. Exchanging gun smoke for tobacco smoke if they are lucky. A machete might also be used.

13 posted on 07/27/2011 7:06:44 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Gangbangers and illegals won’t be affected by this at all.


14 posted on 07/27/2011 7:07:11 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Dependency is slavery.


15 posted on 07/27/2011 7:08:13 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

He who pays the piper calls the tune.


16 posted on 07/27/2011 7:08:19 AM PDT by Grunthor (Faster than the speed of smell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

I’m all for it, the reason being private property rights. The housing authority owns it, they can do as they wish.


17 posted on 07/27/2011 7:09:04 AM PDT by kickonly88 (I love fossil fuel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I’m all for making the dependent life “not so comfortable”,
so that, perhaps, these folks would look for a better way to live.


18 posted on 07/27/2011 7:10:09 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
If you've ever lived in an apartment above a smoker you might feel differently about smoke in a multi-unit building.

I lived for a while in an apartment above a man who it turns out was going through a divorce. He would sit for hours right under my bedroom chain smoking. I couldn't even go into that room. My entire apartment smelled like an ashtray and I had to seal the bedroom off with tape.

You will probably suggest that I should have opened the windows. Right. Chimney effect. Worse.

It's still their castle!

If they want a castle let them go out and get a job and pay for it. I don't want to pay for their castle.

19 posted on 07/27/2011 7:11:21 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

If they’re on public assistance, they don’t need to be spending taxpayer money on smokes.


20 posted on 07/27/2011 7:11:47 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson