Skip to comments.
Federal pay and benefits spared -- for now
GovernmentExecutive.com ^
| July 26, 2011
| Kellie Lunney
Posted on 07/26/2011 4:26:42 PM PDT by mdittmar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: La Enchiladita
Exactly, They will spend and spend until forced to stop.
21
posted on
07/26/2011 5:32:31 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: La Enchiladita
There are never any cuts, just reductions in proposed increases.
Cuts would mean a percentage LESS tomorrow than what was spent today.
22
posted on
07/26/2011 5:36:46 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: edge10
personal is the BIGGEST monkey in the room and they ignore it?....
23
posted on
07/26/2011 5:56:14 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: mdittmar
The federal workforce needs to be slashed.
24
posted on
07/26/2011 5:58:45 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Jim from C-Town
25
posted on
07/26/2011 6:03:25 PM PDT
by
La Enchiladita
(I said it, I meant it and I represent it.)
To: EGPWS
26
posted on
07/26/2011 6:03:36 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: Jim from C-Town
I want a strong military but we need to discourage lifers and keep a steady drum beat of younger people in....that way, the pension and medical benefits won’t be so tremendous, as they are now...
27
posted on
07/26/2011 6:06:00 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: mdittmar
Step 1: 10% cut, including pension, or you may feel free to quit.
Step 2: The taxpayers default on government employees, and your get NOTHING.
28
posted on
07/26/2011 6:23:45 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
To: napscoordinator
It is always Seniors, Vets, and Federal Workers who are targeted. Can you imagine a Senior Citizen who retired from the military and federal government. That poor guy will be screwed three times for giving of himself his entire life. Pitiful.
Sucking at three tits makes one an easy target.
29
posted on
07/26/2011 6:24:46 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
To: Jim from C-Town
You could fire ALL the federal employees and the absence of their former salaries in the national tally would not make a mark ~ they round off things before they get to such a small number.
30
posted on
07/26/2011 7:28:04 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Beelzebubba
Yeah, and it keeps you good and healthy and gives you a steady hand on the firing line.
Do you imagine actions don't have consequences?
31
posted on
07/26/2011 7:29:59 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Say it with me — ENTITLEMENTS.
32
posted on
07/26/2011 7:35:01 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(If we're "teabaggers" then they're "d-baggers.")
To: mdittmar
Want to save billions and juice the economy? Nuke the EPA, EEOC, OSHA, Dept. Education. Fire every last parasite. Numerous other Federal agencies can be slashed to skeleton crews or fire all personnel
33
posted on
07/26/2011 7:35:27 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(NZT -- works better if you're already smart)
To: Jim from C-Town
Do you include the military as federal workers?
34
posted on
07/26/2011 7:38:12 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
To: mdittmar
To: dennisw
While reduction in force ultimately needs to happen, I fail to see how you can “juice” the economy by increasing the number of people without disposable income.
36
posted on
07/26/2011 7:40:21 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(If we're "teabaggers" then they're "d-baggers.")
To: dennisw
Did you realize that the annual grants made by Department of Education are equal to about 1/3 of the total annual payroll for all the federal employees of all kinds including the military and the postal service.
That's just the annual grants from ONE DEPARTMENT.
Interior has some problems along that line, but the Grand Daddy of them all is USDA ~
Just cut out grants and you have more savings than you could ever dream off, and that wouldn't touch any entitlements!
37
posted on
07/26/2011 7:41:33 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: RockinRight
BTW, "entitlements" are things people thought they were paying for or are paying for now. Social Security, Medicare, retirement ~
In fact, if it weren't for Social Security collections the federal government would have gone flat a$$ broke busted on it's back BANKRUPT 30 years ago.
38
posted on
07/26/2011 7:44:44 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: mdittmar
So only our defense gets cut? No words...
39
posted on
07/26/2011 7:47:25 PM PDT
by
Magnum44
(Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior firepower is the cure)
To: Beelzebubba
My federal retirement "contributions" gave you people an interest free loan for many, many years.
If you want to cut me off just give me my money back PLUS interest ~
Bunch of freeloaders ~ this country would have been on the sidewalk several months back but Geithner TOOK all the federal employee deposits he could to shore up continued government spending.
40
posted on
07/26/2011 7:47:49 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson